Metaphors across languages, cultures and discourses: A research agenda

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

This special issue explores metaphor across languages, cultures, and discourses, bringing together papers that reflect the diversity and scope of this research area. The aim is to foster discussion and exchange ideas concerning the role of metaphor in conceptualization, persuasion, and the construction of meaning. In this introductory article, we focus on the two main themes: (1) the universality of metaphor versus cultural variations in its usage; (2) the communicative function of metaphor in discourse. Within these main themes, we discuss case studies that highlight specific domains, including universal and cross-cultural variation in metaphor usage, discursive and communicative aspects of metaphor, and multimodal metaphor. In this article, we provide a summary of the contributions of our authors that represent up-to-date research on issues involving metaphor from a wide scope of perspectives and manage to open up a methodological discussion within metaphor studies. Finally, we summarize the main results and suggest a brief avenue for further research.

作者简介

Aseel Zibin

University of Jordan

Email: a.zabin@ju.edu.jo
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2509-064X

holds PhD in Linguistics, she is Associate Professor of English Language and Linguistics at the Department of English Language and Literature at the University of Jordan. Her research focuses on cognitive linguistics, pragmatics, metaphor, and metonymy. She has published a wide variety of research papers in peer reviewed journals including Language and Cognition, Metaphor and the Social World, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Pragmatics and Society among others.

Amman, Jordan

Olga Solopova

South Ural State University (National Research University)

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: o-solopova@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4170-7267

Dr Habil. in Philology, Professor at the Department of Linguistics and Translation at the Institute of Linguistics and International Communications of South Ural State University (National Research University). Her research interests include metaphor studies, discourse analysis, and diachronic linguistics.

Chelyabinsk, Russia

参考

  1. Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed & Reem Alkhammash. 2022. To get or not to get vaccinated against COVID-19: Saudi women, vaccine hesitancy, and framing effects. Discourse & Communication 16 (1). 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211043724
  2. Alazazmeh, Hadeel M. & Aseel Zibin. 2022. The conceptualization of anger through metaphors, metonymies and metaphtonymies in Jordanian Arabic and English: A contrastive study. Cognitive Semantics 8 (3). 409-446. https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10037
  3. Allan, Kathryn. 2008. Metaphor and Metonymy: A Diachronic Approach. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674311000189
  4. Alnajjar, Ayah & Abdel Rahman M. Altakhaineh. 2023. A critical analysis of metaphors used in Arabic and English cosmetics advertisements. Kervan. International Journal of African and Asian Studies 27 (1). 171-199. https://doi.org/10.13135/1825-263X/7722
  5. Anderson, Wendy. 2017. Metaphor and diachronic variation. In Elena Semino & Zsófia Demjén (eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language, 233-246. Series: Routledge handbooks in linguistics. Routledge.
  6. Augé, Anaïs. 2021. Ideological and explanatory uses of the covid-19 as a war metaphor in science. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20 (2). 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00117.aug
  7. Anderson, Wendy. 2017. Metaphor and diachronic variation. In Elena Semino & Zsófia Demjén (eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language, 233-246. Series: Routledge handbooks in linguistics. Routledge.
  8. Bartsch, Renate. 2009. Generating polysemy: Metaphor and metonymy. In René Dirven & Ralf Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 49-74. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.1.49
  9. Benczes, Réka & Bence Ságvári. 2018. Life is a battlefield: Conceptualizations of life among Hungarian adults. Society and Economy 40 (4). 571-586. https://doi.org/10.1556/ 204.2018.40.4.6
  10. Bilá, Magdaléna & Svetlana V. Ivanova. 2020. Language, culture and ideology in discursive practices. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (2). 219-252. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-219-252
  11. Boutet, Dominique, Aliyah Morgenstern & Allan Cienki. 2016. Grammatical aspect and gesture in French: A kinesiological approach. Russian Journal of Linguistics 20 (3). 132-151.
  12. Budaev, Edward V. 2017. Metaphors of disease in the Russian press. XLingae 10 (2). 30-37. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2017.10.02.03
  13. Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2002. Second language figurative proficiency: A comparative study of Malay and English. Applied linguistics 23 (1). 104-133. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.104
  14. Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612
  15. Charteris-Black, Johnatan. 2011. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706
  16. Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2021. Metaphors of Coronavirus: Invisible Enemy or Zombie Apocalypse? Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/1 0.1007/978-3-030-85106-4
  17. Chudinov, Anatoly, Edward Budaev & Olga Solopova. 2020. Political Metaphor Studies: Discursive Turn. Мoscow: Flinta.
  18. Chudinov, Anatoly, Edward Budaev & Olga Solopova. 2023. 政治隐喻学 认知-话语研究. Peking: Peking University Press.
  19. Chudinov Anatoly P. & Elizaveta V. Shustrova. 2024. Modern metaphor research in Russia: Trends, schools and results. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28 (1). 190-209. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-35070
  20. Cienki, Alan & Cornelia Müller. 2008. Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 483-501. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.029
  21. Díaz-Vera, Javier E. & Rosario Caballero. 2013. Exploring the feeling-emotions continuum across cultures: Jealousy in English and Spanish. Intercultural Pragmatics 10 (2). 265-294. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0012
  22. Díaz-Vera, Javier E. 2015. Figuration and language history: Universality and variation. In Javier E. Díaz-Vera (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language, 3-13. Berlin, Munich, Boston, Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335453
  23. Díaz-Vera, Javier E. 2024. Old English emotion is temperature: Cultural influences on a universal experience. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28 (1). 33-54. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34603
  24. Dolić, Belkisa. 2021. Ogledi o Jeziku i Rodu. Diskursna, Pragmatička i Gramatička Analiza. Bihać: Pedagoški fakultet. https://doi.org/10.33669/KJ2021-32-04
  25. El Refaie, Elizabeth. 2001. Metaphors we discriminate by: Naturalized themes in Austrian newspaper articles about asylum seekers. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5 (3). 352-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00154
  26. Ervas, Francesca. 2017. Another metaphor is possible. Challenging social stereotypes in figurative language comprehension. Reti, Saperi, Linguaggi, Italian Journal of Cognitive Sciences 1. 79-96. https://doi.org/10.12832/87357
  27. Ervas, Francesca, Pietro Salis, Cristina Sechi & Rachele Fanari. 2022. Exploring metaphor’s communicative effects in reasoning on vaccination. Frontiers in Psychology 13 (1027733). 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1027733
  28. Farzad, Sharifian, René Dirven & Ning Yu (eds.). 2008. Culture, Body, and Language: Conceptualizations of Internal Body Organs across Cultures and Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  29. Fomin, Andrey & Elizaveta Mona. 2019. Conceptual metaphor as a means of terrorist suggestion (on the material of the Islamic state video messages). Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (3). 698-713. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-698-713
  30. Forceville, Charles J. & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi. 2009. Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366
  31. Flusberg, Stephen. J., Teenie Matlock & Paul H. Thibodeau. 2017. Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication 11 (6). 769-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111
  32. Geeraerts, Dirk. 2015. Four guidelines for diachronic metaphor research. In Javier E. Díaz-Vera (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language, 15-28. Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335453.15
  33. Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr., Paula L. C. Lima & Edson Francozo. 2004. Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics 36 (7). 1189-1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.009
  34. Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. 2006. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.
  35. Goatly, Andrew. 2017. Metaphor and Grammar in the Poetic Representation of Nature. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (1). 48-72. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-48-72
  36. Gornostaeva, Anna. 2018. Ironic Metaphors in Political Discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (1). 108-125. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-108-125
  37. Guan, Shaoyang & Yuhua Sun. 2023. Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in political cartoons as a means of country-image construction. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27 (2). 444-467. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-31664
  38. Kalinin, Oleg I. & Alexander V. Ignatenko. 2022. Comparative analysis of the use of metaphors in Russian, English and Chinese media texts of informational and influencing nature. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics 13 (4). 1062-1082. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-4-1062-1082
  39. Kalinin, Oleg I. & Alexander V. Ignatenko. 2024. Metaphor power in the context of the author’s opinion expression and perception. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28 (1). 166-189. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34791
  40. Kappelhoff, Hermann & Cornelia Müller. 2011. Embodied meaning construction: Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture, and feature film. Metaphor and the Social World 1 (2). 121-153. https://doi.org/10.1075/MSW.1.2.02KAP
  41. Khalifah, Lama & Aseel Zibin. 2022. Arabic-English metaphor translation from a cognitive linguistic perspective: Evidence from Naguib Mahfuz Midaq Alley and its translated version. Babel 68 (6). 860-889. https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00296.kha
  42. Kilyeni, Annamaria & Nadežda Silaški. 2014. Beauty and the beast from a cognitive linguistic perspective: Animal metaphors for women in Serbian and Romanian. Gender Studies 13 (1). 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1515/genst-2015-0012
  43. Kiose, Maria I. 2023. Mapping models in novel metaphors and their effect on gaze behavior and default interpretations in native and target languages. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27 (2). 297-315. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-30055
  44. Kondratjeva, Olga N. 2020. A typology of social network users in the metaphorical mirror of the Russian mass-media. Philological Class 25 (1). 62-72. https://doi.org/10.26170/ FK20-01-06
  45. Koptyaeva, Natalia N & Elizaveta V. Shistrova. 2021. Representation of Jeremy Corbyn in British political cartoons: Zoomorphic metaphor. Political Linguistics 89. 45-54. https://doi.org/10.26170/1999- 2629_2021_05_05
  46. Kövecses, Zoltan. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press.
  48. Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. USA: Oxford University Press.
  49. Kövecses, Zoltán. 2020. An extended view of conceptual metaphor theory. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18 (1). 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127
  50. Kövecses, Zoltán. 2014. Conceptualizing emotions. A revised cognitive linguistic perspective. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 50 (1). 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2014-0002
  51. Kövecses, Zoltán, Ambrus Laura, Hegedűs Dániel, Imai Ren & Anna Sobczak. 2019. The lexical vs. corpus-based method in the study of metaphors. In Marianna Bolognesi, Mario Brdar & Kristina Š Despot (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in the digital age: Theory and methods for building repositories of figurative language, 149-173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.8.07kov
  52. Kövecses, Zoltán. 2021. Standard and extended conceptual theory revisited: Some definitional and taxonomic issues. In Wen Xu & John R. Taylor (eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 191-204. New York: Routledge.
  53. Kövecses, Zoltán, Réka Benczes, Anna Rommel & Veronika Szelid. 2024. Universality versus variation in the conceptualization of anger: A question of methodology. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28 (1). 55-79. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34834
  54. Kozlova, Lyubov A. 2020. Metaphor as the refection of culture determined cognition. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (4). 899-925. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-4-899-925
  55. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  56. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
  57. Leontovich, Olga A. 2017. “A mirror in which everyone displays their image”: Identity construction in Discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (2). 247-259. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-2-247-259
  58. Leontovich, Olga A., Oleg I. Kalinin, & Alexander V. Ignatenko. 2023. Metaphor power and language typology: Analysis of correlation on the material of the United Nations Declarations. Training, Language and Culture 7 (2). 21-29. https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442X-2023-7-2-21-29
  59. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara. 2021. Comparing languages and cultures: Parametrization of analytic criteria. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (2). 343-368. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-2-343-368
  60. Littlemore, Jeannette. 2019. Metaphors in the Mind: Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  61. Martín de la Rosa, Victoria. 2023. Taking back control: The role of image schemas in the Brexit discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27 (2). 276-296. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-31509
  62. Montagut, Marta & Carlota M. Moragas-Fernández. 2020. The European refugee crisis discourse in the Spanish Press: Mapping humanization and dehumanization frames through metaphors. International Journal of Communication 14. 69-91.
  63. Moody, Stephanie & Zohreh R. Eslami. 2020. Political discourse, code-switching, and ideology. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (2). 325-343. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-325-343
  64. Mujagić, Mersina. 2022. The Migration as an Invasion and the Common European House metaphors in media discourse. ExELL 10 (1). 22-50. https://doi.org/10.2478/exell-2022-0009
  65. Mujagić, Mersina. 2024. Politics metaphor in British and Bosnian-Herzegovinian migration discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28 (1). 144-165. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34534
  66. Musolff, Andreas & Jörg Zinken. 2009. Metaphor and Discourse. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594647
  67. Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London/Oxford/New York/New Delhi/Sydney: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
  68. Musolff, Andreas. 2019. Creativity in Metaphor Interpretation. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (1). 23-39. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-1-23-39
  69. Musolff, Andreas. 2021. Hyperbole and emotionalisation - escalation of pragmatic effects of metaphor and proverb in the Brexit debate. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 628-644. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-628-644
  70. Nisbet, Matthew C. 2009. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 51 (2). 12-23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
  71. Ozyumenko, Vladimir I. & Tatiana V. Larina. 2021. Threat and fear: Pragmatic purposes of emotionalisation in media discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 746-766. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-746-766
  72. Pickering, Sharon. 2001. Common sense and original deviancy: News discourses and asylum seekers in Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies 14 (2). 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/14.2.169
  73. Ponton, Douglas Mark. 2020. Understanding Political Persuasion: Linguistic and Rhetorical Analysis. Vernon Press.
  74. Ponton, Douglas M. 2021. “Never in my life have I heard such a load of absolute nonsense. Wtf.” Political satire on the handling of the COVID-19 crisis. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 25 (3). 767-788. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-767-788
  75. Ponton, Douglas M. 2023. Narrower or broader ground? The role and function of metaphors in legal discourse. In John Douthwaite & Ulrike Tabbert (eds.), The Linguistics of Crime, 282-230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  76. Santa Ana, Otto. 2002. Brown Tide Rising. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  77. Schnell, Zsuzsanna & Francesca Ervas. 2022. Intercultural discussion of conceptual universals in discourse: Joint online methodology to bring about social change through novel conceptualizations of Covid-19. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9 (1). 215. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01230-4
  78. Semenova Elena M. & Maria L. Alekseyeva 2023. “Argumentative” resources of metaphorization (on the basis of modern American political media discourse). Political Linguistics 1. 69-76. https://doi.org/10.26170/1999-2629_2023_01_08
  79. Sharifian, Farzad. 2014. Advances in cultural linguistics. In Masataka Yamaguchi, Dennis Tay & Benjamin Blount (eds.), Approaches to language, culture, and cognition: The intersection of cognitive linguistics and linguistic anthropology, 99-123. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  80. Silaški, Nadežda & Tatjana Đurović. 2022. From an invisible enemy to a football match with the virus: Adjusting the Covid-19 pandemic metaphors to political agendas in Serbian public discourse. In Andreas Musolff, Ruth Breeze, Kayo Kondo & Sara Vilar-Lluch (eds.), Pandemic and crisis discourse: Communicating Covid-19 and public health strategy, 271-284. London/Oxford/New York/New Delhi/Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350232730.ch-015
  81. Silaški, Nadežda &Tatjana Đurović. 2024. The explanatory function of metaphor scenario in the Serbian pro-vaccine discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28 (1). 123-143. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34958
  82. Solopova, Olga A. & Anatoly P. Chudinov. 2018. Diachronic analysis of political metaphors in the British corpus: From Victory Bells to Russia’s V-Day. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (2). 313-337. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-2-313-337
  83. Solopova, Olga A. & Natalya N. Koshkarova. 2021. Religion as source domain of metaphors in World War II media discourse. Nauchnyi dialog 4. 148-167. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-4-148-167
  84. Solopova, Olga A. & Svetlana L. Kushneruk. 2021. War yesterday and today: The image of Russia in British media discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 723-745. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-723-745
  85. Solopova Olga A., Don Nilsen & Alleen Nilsen. 2023. The image of Russia through animal metaphors: A diachronic case study of American media discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27 (3). 521-542. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-35048
  86. Soriano, Cristina. 2003. Some anger metaphors in Spanish and English. A contrastive review. International Journal of English Studies 3 (2). 107-122.
  87. Sporova, Irina P. & Marina R. Zheltukhina 2022. Metaphor as a tool for terbal manipulation in the genre of political E-mailing. Political Linguistics 6. 110-119. https://doi.org/10.26170/1999-2629_ 2022_06_12
  88. Steen, Gerard J. 2017. Deliberate metaphor theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics 14 (1). 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0001
  89. Sun, Yuhua, Oleg I. Kalinin & Alexander V. Ignatenko. 2021. The use of metaphor power indices for the analysis of speech impact in political public speeches. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (1). 250-277. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-250-277
  90. Taylor, Charlotte. 2021. Metaphors of migration over time. Discourse & Society 32 (4). 463-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926521992156
  91. Thibodeau, Paul H. & Lera Boroditsky. 2013. Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE 8 (1). 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052961
  92. Tran, Ba Tien. 2022. Universality vs. cultural specificity of anger metaphors and metonymies in English and Vietnamese idioms. Russian Journal of Linguistics 26 (1). 74-94. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-24951
  93. Trim, Richard. 2011. Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  94. Trim, Richard. 2015. The interface between synchronic and diachronic conceptual metaphor: The role of embodiment, culture and semantic field. In Javier E. Díaz-Vera (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language, 95-122. Berlin, Munich, Boston, Walter de Gruyter Publ. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335453
  95. Trim, Richard. 2022. Mapping the Origins of Figurative Language in Comparative Literature. London: Routledge.
  96. Trim, Richard. 2024. French political symbolism and identity construction. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28 (1). 102-122. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34560
  97. van der Hel, Sandra, Lina Hellsten & Gerard Steen. 2018. Tipping points and climate change: Metaphor between science and the media. Environmental Communication 12 (5). 605-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1410198
  98. van Der Valk, Ineke. 2003. Right-wing parliamentary discourse on immigration in France. Discourse & Society 14 (3). 309-348. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030143004
  99. van Poppel, Lotte. 2020. The relevance of metaphor in argumentation. Uniting pragma-dialectics and deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics 170. 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.007
  100. van Poppel, Lotte. 2021. The study of metaphor in argumentation theory. Argumentation 35. 177-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09523-1
  101. Wagemans, Jean. 2016. Analysing metaphor in argumentative discourse. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 2. 79-94. https://doi.org/10.4396/406
  102. Yu, Ning. 2017. Life as opera: A cultural metaphor in Chinese. In Farzad Sharifian (ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics, 65-87. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4056-6_4
  103. Zappettini, Franco, Douglas M. Ponton & Tatiana V. Larina. 2021. Emotionalisation of contemporary media discourse: A research agenda. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 586-610. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-586-610
  104. Zeng, Winnie H., Christian Burgers & Kathleen Ahrens. 2021. Framing metaphor use over time: ‘Free economy’ metaphors in Hong Kong political discourse (1997-2017). Lingua 252. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102955
  105. Zibin, Aseel & Abdel Rahman M. Altakhaineh. 2023. A blending analysis of metaphors and metonymies used to depict the deal of the century by Jordanian cartoonists. Language and Cognition 15 (2). 377-404. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2023.1
  106. Zibin, Aseel. 2020. A corpus-based study of metaphors used to describe Syrian refugees in Jordanian politico-economic discourse: A critical metaphor analysis approach. Pragmatics and Society 11 (4). 640-663. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.17037.zib
  107. Zibin, Aseel. 2022. Monomodal and multimodal metaphors in editorial cartoons on the coronavirus by Jordanian cartoonists. Linguistics Vanguard 8 (1). 383-398. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0047
  108. Zibin, Aseel. 2022. The type and function of metaphors in Jordanian economic discourse: A critical metaphor analysis approach. Language Sciences 93. 101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANGSCI.2022.101488
  109. Zibin, Aseel, Lama Khalifah & Abdel R.M. Altakhaineh. 2024. The role of metaphor in creating polysemy complexes in Jordanian Arabic and American English. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28 (1). 80-101. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-34555
  110. Zykova, Irina V. 2023. Linguistic creativity and multimodal tropes in cinematic discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 27 (2). 334-362. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-33206

版权所有 © Zibin A., Solopova O., 2024

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##