The image of Russia through animal metaphors: A diachronic case study of American media discourse

封面

如何引用文章

详细

The image of a country has a critical impact on the degree of its political, economic and cultural influence in the world. This indicates a need to understand various perceptions of a country that exist among other nations and mechanisms of their formation and change in an ever-shifting world. This qualitative case study seeks to examine the changing nature of wild animal metaphors employed to model the image of Russia in American media discourse in the XIX-XXI centuries. The study is limited by two source domains, namely, the beast and the bear. They were analyzed within particular contexts: American English, culture and media discourse. The research data were drawn from dictionaries and corpora. The dictionaries included etymological and explanatory entries, as well as those covering idioms, symbols, and metaphors. The corpora research data were collected from the Corpus of Contemporary American English and Chronicling America, a collection of historic digitalized texts. A total of 218 metaphors were selected from 4929 texts. The metaphors were studied through lexicographic, conceptual metaphor, culture-specific, corpus, discourse, and diachronic methods. The findings of this study suggest that the two metaphors “Russia is a beast” and “Russia is a bear” are frequently used in realizing the strategy of ‘othering’ in XXI century American media discourse. Still, their meanings allowed for variation and modification in the periods of the two countries’ amity and cooperation. In the XIX century and in the years of US-Soviet alliance in WWII the metaphors could evoke positive images of Russia, thus, realizing the strategy of ‘bridging’ or ‘belonging’. The contribution of this study has been to confirm that, whatever metaphorical projections exist in language and culture, historical factors determine choices in any sample of discourse. This could be important for understanding the mechanisms involved in modeling the image of modern Russia in foreign media discourses.

作者简介

Olga Solopova

South Ural State University (national research university)

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: o-solopova@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4170-7267

Dr Habil. in Philology, Professor at the Department of Linguistics and Translation of the Institute of Linguistics and International Communications, South Ural State University (national research university). Her research interests include metaphor studies, discourse analysis, diachronic linguistics, and linguistic political prognostics.

76, Lenina Av., Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia

Don Nilsen

Arizona State University

Email: don.nilsen@asu.edu
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-4620-8181

Assistant Dean of Arizona State University’s (ASU) Emeritus College’s Division of the Humanities, a co-founder of the International Society for Humor Studies (ISHS), a co-winner of the Lifetime Achievement Award by the Association of Applied and Therapeutic Humor Association (AATH). Since his retirement from ASU’s English Department in 2011, he has taught courses for the Arizona State University Honors College, Osher, New Adventures, New Frontiers, Sagewood, Stonegate, Sun City, Friendship Village, and the Arizona Humanities Council. His research interests include humor studies, metaphor studies, cultural linguistics, and comparative research.

Unit C-163, Friendship Village, 2625 East Southern Avenue Tempe, AZ 85282-7664

Alleen Nilsen

Arizona State University

Email: don.nilsen@asu.edu
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-4404-7084

Arizona State University’s (ASU) Assistant Vice President for Personnel, a co-founder of the International Society for Humor Studies (ISHS), a co-winner of the Lifetime Achievement Award by the Association of Applied and Therapeutic Humor Association (AATH). Since her retirement from ASU’s English Department in 2011, she has taught courses for the ASU Honors College, Osher, New Adventures, New Frontiers, Sagewood, Stonegate, Sun City, Friendship Village, and the Arizona Humanities Council. Her research interests include humor studies, metaphor studies, cultural linguistics, and comparative research.

Unit C-163, Friendship Village, 2625 East Southern Avenue Tempe, AZ 85282-7664

参考

  1. Allan, Kathryn. 2008. Metaphor and Metonymy: A Diachronic Approach. Oxford, Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674311000189
  2. Anderson, Wendy. 2017. Metaphor and diachronic variation. In Elena Semino & Zsófia Demjén (eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language, 233-246. Series: Routledge handbooks in linguistics. Routledge.
  3. Arendt, Florian, Franziska Marquart & Jörg Matthes. 2015. Effects of right-wing populist political advertising on implicit and explicit stereotypes. Journal of Media Psychology 27 (4). 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000139
  4. Benczes, Réka & Bence Ságvári. 2018. Life is a battlefield: Conceptualizations of life among Hungarian adults. Society and Economy 40 (4). 571-586. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2018.40.4.6
  5. Bisschops, Ralph A. 2019. Pursuing a diachronic approach to metaphor: Metaphorical precedents and emblems. In Antonio Barcelona-Sànchez (ed.), Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association (AELCO): 11th International Conference of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association (AELCO), 17th-19th October 2018, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, 1-3.
  6. Borelli, Eleonora & Cristina Cacciari. The comprehension of metaphorical descriptions conveying gender stereotypes. An exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology 10. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02615
  7. Cánovas, Cristóbal P. 2015. Cognitive patterns in Greek poetic metaphors of emotion: A diachronic approach. In Javier E. Díaz-Vera (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language, 295-318. Berlin, Munich, Boston, Walter de Gruyter Publ. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335453
  8. Carver, Terrell. 2008. Real construction through metaphorical language: How animals and machines (amongst other metaphors) maketh (hu)man (what ‘he’ is). In Carver Terrel & Jernej Pikalo (eds.), Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the World, 151-164. London: Routledge.
  9. Chudinov, Anatoly, Edward Budaev & Olga Solopova. 2020. Political Metaphor Studies: Discursive Turn. Мoscow: Flinta.
  10. Chudinov, Anatoly, Edward Budaev & Olga Solopova. 2023. 政治隐喻学 认知-话语研究. Peking: Peking University Press.
  11. Cuddy, Amy J. C., Susan T. Fiske, Virginia S. Y. Kwan & Peter Glick. 2009. Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology 48. 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608x314935
  12. DeMello, Margo. 2021. Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies. Columbia University Press.
  13. Díaz-Vera, Javier E. 2015. Figuration and language history: Universality and variation. In Javier E. Díaz-Vera (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language, 3-13. Berlin, Munich, Boston, Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335453
  14. Dobrosklonskaya, Tatiana G. 2021. Markers of emotionality in Russian news coverage of the 75-th anniversary of WWII Victory. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 705-722. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-705-722
  15. Dolea, Alina, Diana Ingenhoff & Anabella Beju. 2021. Country images and identities in times of populism: Swiss media discourses on the “Stop Mass Immigration” initiative. International Communication Gazette 83 (4). 301-325.
  16. Dovidio, John F., Miles Hewstone, Peter Glick & Victoria M. Esses. 2010. Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview. In John F. Dovidio, Miles Hewstone, Peter Glick & Victoria M. Esses (eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination, 3-29. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919.n1
  17. Ervas, Francesca. 2017. Another metaphor is possible. Challenging social stereotypes in figurative language comprehension. Reti, Saperi, Linguaggi, Italian Journal of Cognitive Sciences 1. 79-96. https://doi.org/10.12832/87357
  18. Goatly, Andrew. 2007. Washing the Brain - Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  19. Geeraerts, Dirk. 2015. Four guidelines for diachronic metaphor research. In Javier E. Díaz-Vera (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language, 15-28. Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335453.15
  20. Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. 2017. Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107762350
  21. Giffard, Antony C. & Nancy K. Rivenburgh. 2000. News agencies, national images,and global media events. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77 (1). 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700102
  22. Halm, Friedrich. 1997. Der Sohn der Wildnis. In Henry Garland & Mary Garland (eds.), The Oxford companion to German literature (3 ed.). Oxford University Press.
  23. Izdebska, Daria. 2016. Metaphors of weapons and armour through time. In Wendy Anderson, Ellen Bramwell & Carole Hough (eds.), Mapping English metaphor through time, 221-242. Oxford University Press.
  24. Jenes, Barbara. 2005. Possibilities of shaping country image. Marketing és Menedzsment 2. 18-29.
  25. Kalinin, Oleg I. & Alexander V. Ignatenko. 2022. Comparative analysis of the use of metaphors in Russian, English and Chinese media texts of informational and influencing nature. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics 13 (4). 1062-1082. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-4-1062-1082
  26. Kopylova, Tatiana & Liliya Kilina. 2020. The media image of the country in political discourse: Speech methods of creation. Mundo Eslavo 19. 77-88.
  27. Kozlova, Lyubov A. 2020. Metaphor as the refection of culture determined cognition. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (4). 899-925. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-4-899-925
  28. Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408
  29. Kövecses, Zoltán. 2009. Metaphor and Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594647_2
  30. Kövecses, Zoltán. 2021. Metaphoric conceptual pathways. Cognitive Semantics 7 (1). 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-07010003
  31. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1982. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  32. Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
  33. Littlemore, Jeannette. 2019. Metaphors in the Mind: Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Lung, Ioana. 2018. Jungle politics: Animal metaphors in international relations. European View 17 (2). 235-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685818809330
  35. Maass, Anna, Caterina Suitner & Luciano Arcuri. 2014. The role of metaphors in intergroup relations. In Mark J. Landau, Michael D. Robinson & Brian P. Meier (eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life, 153-177. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14278-008
  36. Musolff, Andreas. 2021. Hyperbole and emotionalisation - escalation of pragmatic effects of metaphor and proverb in the Brexit debate. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 628-644. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-628-644
  37. Ozyumenko, Vladimir. 2017. Media discourse in an atmosphere of information warfare: From manipulation to aggression. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (1). 203-220. https://doi.org/10.22363/231291822017211203220
  38. Ozyumenko, Vladimir I. & Tatiana V. Larina. 2021. Threat and fear: Pragmatic purposes of emotionalisation in media discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 746-766. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-746-766
  39. Ozick, Cynthia. 2021. Metaphor and Memory. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
  40. Ponton, Douglas Mark. 2020. Understanding Political Persuasion: Linguistic and Rhetorical Analysis. Vernon Press.
  41. Smith, Michael K., Howard W. Pollio & Marian K. Pitts. 1981. Metaphor as intellectual history: Conceptual categories underlying figurative usage in American English from 1675 to 1975. Linguistics 19. 911-935.
  42. Solopova, Olga A. 2019. Retrospective analysis of British political discourse about the future of the USSR. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki 4. 124-134. https://doi/org/10.20916/1812-3228-2019-4-124-134
  43. Solopova, Olga & Anatoly Chudinov. 2018. Diachronic analysis of political metaphors in the British corpus: From Victory bells to Russia’s V-Day. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (2). 313-337. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-2-313-337
  44. Solopova, Olga & Anatoly Chudinov. 2019. Prognostic potential of political metaphors. [Special Issue]. Fachsprache. Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication. 48-64. https://doi.org/10.24989/fs.v41iSpecial%20Is.1765
  45. Solopova, Olga A. & Svetlana L. Kushneruk. 2021. War yesterday and today: The image of Russia in British media discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 723-745. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-723-745
  46. Solopova, Olga A. & Maria S. Saltykova. 2019. Constructing the ideal future in foreign military media discourses of the World War II period. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (3). 762-783. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-762-783
  47. Steel, Karl. 2020. Beasts, animals, and animal metaphor, in Shakespeare and his fellow dramatists. In Holly Dugan & Karen Raber (eds.), Routledge handbook of Shakespeare and animals, 61-73. Routledge.
  48. Sun, Yuhua, Oleg I. Kalinin & Alexander V. Ignatenko. 2021. The use of metaphor power indices for the analysis of speech impact in the political public speeches. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (1). 250-277. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-250-277
  49. Talebinejad, Reza M. & Vahid H. Dastjerdi. 2005. A cross-cultural study of animal metaphors: When owls are not wise! Metaphor and Symbol 20. 133-150.
  50. Tang, Na 2023. The image of Russia in the Russian-Ukrainian war from the perspective of American media: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis. Open Access Library Journal 10 (2).
  51. Tran, Ba Tien. 2022. Universality vs. cultural specificity of anger metaphors and metonymies in English and Vietnamese idioms. Russian Journal of Linguistics 26 (1). 74-94. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-24951
  52. Trim, Richard. 2007. Metaphor Networks: The Comparative Evolution of Figurative Language. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  53. Trim, Richard. 2011. Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  54. Trim, Richard. 2015. The interface between synchronic and diachronic conceptual metaphor: The role of embodiment, culture and semantic field. In Javier E. Díaz-Vera (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures: Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language, 95-122. Berlin, Munich, Boston, Walter de Gruyter Publ. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335453
  55. Wood, Steve. 2022. Political imagery and the Russia-Germany-America triangle. [Special Issue on Nation-Building in the Post-Soviet States]. Nationalities Papers 51 (1). 136-156. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.41
  56. Zappettini, Franco, Douglas M. Ponton & Tatiana V. Larina. 2021. Emotionalisation of contemporary media discourse: A research agenda. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 586-610. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-586-610
  57. Zeng, Winnie H., Christian Burgers & Kathleen Ahrens. 2021. Framing metaphor use over time: ‘Free economy’ metaphors in Hong Kong political discourse (1997-2017). Lingua 252. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102955
  58. Ammer, Christine. 2013. The American Heritage Dictionary of Idioms. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
  59. CA - Chronicling America: The National Endowment for the Humanities and the Library of Congress. https://www.chroniclingamerica.loc.gov (accessed: 25 May 2023).
  60. COCA - Corpus of Contemporary American English. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/ (accessed 13 May 2023).
  61. Dictionary of Symbolism - Dictionary of Symbolism: Cultural Icons and the Meanings behind Them. 1994. Biedermann, Hans (ed.). New York: Meridan.
  62. Metaphors Dictionary. 2001. Sommer Elyse & Dorrie Weiss (eds.). Detroit: Visible Ink Press.
  63. Metaphors in English - MacMillan Dictionary. https://www.macmillandictionary.com/learn/metaphor/ (accessed 23 April 2023).
  64. New Oxford American Dictionary (3 ed.). 2010. Stevenson Angus & Christine A. Lindberg (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  65. Online Etymology Dictionary. https://www.etymonline.com (accessed 25 May 2023).
  66. Online Symbolism Dictionary - University of Michigan. http://websites.umich.edu/~umfandsf/symbolismproject/symbolism.html (accessed 27 May 2023).
  67. Palmatier, Robert A. 1995. Speaking of Animals: A Dictionary of Animal Metaphors. Greenwood Publishing Group.
  68. Pasanek, Brad. 2015. Metaphors of Mind: An Eighteenth-Century Dictionary. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  69. Spears, Richard A. 1988. NTC’s Thematic Dictionary of American Idioms. NTC/Contemporary Publishing Company.
  70. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (5 ed.). 2018. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.

版权所有 © Solopova O., Nilsen D., Nilsen A., 2023

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##