Kinship terms variation among speakers of Bahmaie dialect in Khuzestan Province of Iran

封面

如何引用文章

详细

Language indicates the social and cultural identity of the nations, and literature is of great value in reflecting ideas, beliefs and visions in language. Considering the fact that the local dialects that lack written literature are more subject to convergence and death, extensive research is required for further documentation and investigating the factors leading to their infrequency of use. Bahmaie, a variant of Luri dialect spoken in the southwest of Iran, is an example in which the stylistic variation of kinship terms represents dialect endangerment and necessitates in-depth analysis of the factors affecting this variation. The present study aims at examining the variation of Bahmaie kinship terms and their Persian equivalents across different contexts, with respect to age, gender, educational level, and third person presence. To this aim, a 32item questionnaire was designed and distributed among 275 Bahmaie speakers divided into four age groups: 15-19, 20-29, 30-39, and 40 - above. The findings of the study indicated that the 15-19 age group speakers favored the Persian terms while those aged 40 - above were more likely to use Bahmaie terms. They also showed the impact of other contextual characteristics on variation of kinship terms (interlocutors’ status, gender, educational level, and third person presence). Results further demonstrated that Bahmaie speakers have a tendency towards being persified, and this trend is more pronounced among young speakers. This tendency is attributed to the dominance of Persian as the only high-status language, language contact, and migration causing a generation gap. The implication of the research is that documenting Bahmaie dialect, encouraging educated speakers to use it and fostering intra-cultural communication, are the strategies that can be helpful in keeping this dialect alive.

作者简介

Khalil Tazik

Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: khaliltazik@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0168-3400

Assistant Professor at Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. His main interests are discourse analysis, psycholinguistics and sociolinguistics.

Ahvaz, Iran

Mohammad Aliakbari

Ilam University

Email: m.aliakbari@ilam.ac.ir
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5974-9708

Professor of Applied Linguistics at the University of Ilam, Iran. His main interests are educational psychology and sociolinguistics.

Iran

参考

  1. Aliakbari, Mohammad & Khodakarami Hajar. 2013. Persian Kin Terms Prevalence in Fayli Kurdish Dialect in Relation to Gender, Age and the Level of Education. Ilam Culture 34. 67-86.
  2. Amini, Reza. 2020. Kinship terms and terms of address in Nænæji dialect. Language Related Research 11 (4). 639-667.
  3. Bisilki, Abraham Kwesi. 2017. Bisilki: A sociolinguistic analysis of Kinship terms in Likpakpaln (Konkomba). Ghana Journal of Linguistics 6 (3). 33-58.
  4. Bistoon, Abbasi, Amer Gheiyury & Kerstin Kazzazi. 2020. Semantics of Hawrami kinship terms. The International Journal of Humanities 20 (4). 1-21.
  5. Epps, Patience, Anthony Webster & Anthony Woodbury. 2017. A holistic humanities of speaking: Franz Boas and the continuing centrality of texts. International Journal of American Linguistics 83. 41-78.
  6. Epp, Patience, Danny Law & Na’ama Pat-El. 2022. Historical Linguistics and Endangered Languages: Exploring Diversity in Language Change. Routledge publication.
  7. Erfani, Parisa. 2013. Azeri morphosyntactic variation: The effect of Persian on NP structures, Texas Linguistics Forum 56, 12-22. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Symposium about Language and Society-Austin April 13-14.
  8. Feagin, Crawford. 2003. Entering the community: Fieldwork. In Jack. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 13-27. Blackwell Publishing.
  9. Gaby, Alice. 2017. Kinship semantics: Culture in the lexicon. In Farzad Sharifian (ed.), Advances in cultural linguistics. Cultural linguistics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4056-6_9
  10. Geng, Chunling. 2015. Comparison between Chinese address terms and English address Terms. Higher Education of Social Science 9. 1-4.
  11. Hasanvand Amozade, Abozar. 2014. Linguistic relativity in kinship terms of Laki dialect in Darrehshahr compared with standard Persian language. Ilam Culture 15 (44). 138-154.
  12. Holmes, Janet. 2013. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Routledge.
  13. Jamali Nesari, Shahram & Gowhari Habib. 2020. A survey analysis of the use of Kurdish kinship terms and Persian borrowed equivalents (based on data from Kalhori Kurdish). Language Research 11 (1). 49-72.
  14. Keshavarz Mohammad Hossein. 2001. The role of social context, intimacy, and distance in the choice of forms of address. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 148. 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2001.015
  15. Khalil, Amr A. & Tatiana Larina 2022. Terms of endearment in American English and Syrian Arabic family discourse. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics 13 (1). 27-44. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2022-13-1-27-44
  16. Khan, Geoffrey. 2022. Phonological enrichment in neo-Aramaic dialects through language contact. In Patience Epp, Danny Law & Na’ama Pat-El (eds.), Historical linguistics and endangered languages: Exploring diversity in language change, 41-56. Routledge publication.
  17. Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.
  18. Labov, William. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Vol. 3. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  19. Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Manjulakshi, L. 2004. Modes of address in Kannada: A sociolinguistic study of language use in Mysore District, available at http://www.langaugeinindia.com.
  21. Morozova, Maria S. 2019. Language contact in social context: Kinship terms and Kinship relations of the Mrkovići in Southern Montenegro. Journal of Language Contact 12 (2). 305-343. Available From: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01202003
  22. Obler, Loraine K. 1993. Neurolinguistic aspects of second language development and attrition. Progression and Regression in Language. 178-195.
  23. Parkin, Robert. 1989. Some comments on Brahui kinship terminology. Indo-Iranian Journal 23. 37-43.
  24. Parkin, Robert. 1998. Dravidian and Iroquois in South Asia, in Maurice Godelier et al. (eds.), In Transformations of kinship. Washington DC and London: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  25. Phillipson, Robert. 2013. Linguistic Imperialism Continued. Routledge.
  26. Rácz, Peter, Sam Passmore & Fonia M. Jordan. 2020. Social practice and shared history, not social scale, structure cross-cultural complexity in kinship systems. Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (2). 744-765. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12430
  27. Sagdieva, Ramilya, Damir Husnutdinov, Ramil Mirzagitov & Radik Galiullin. 2019. Kinship terms as proof of genetic relationship. Journal of Social Studies Education Research 10 (3). 103-117.
  28. Saeidfar, Ala & Tohidian Iman. 2012. Attrition of Isfahani dialect: Social class and age effects. Elixir Social Science 44. 7324-7327.
  29. Sankoff, David & Pierrette Thibault. 1981. Weak complementarity: Tense and aspect in Montreal French. Syntactic Change 25. 205-216.
  30. Suryanarayan, Neelakshi & Amr Khalil. 2021. Kinship terms as indicators of identity and social reality: A case study of Syrian Arabic and Hindi. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (1). 125-146. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-1-125-146
  31. Wardhaugh, Ronald. 2006. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (5th ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  32. Wierzbicka, Anna. 2016. Back to “Mother” and “Father”: Overcoming the Eurocentrism of kinship studies through eight lexical universals. Current Anthropology 57. 408-429. doi: 10.1086/687360
  33. Wierzbicka, Anna. 2017. The Meaning of Kinship Terms: A Developmental and Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford University Press.
  34. Wolfram, Walt. 2006. Variation and Language: Overview. In Keith Brown (ed.), Elsevier encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.), 333-341. Oxford: Elsevier.
  35. Yarmohammadi, Lotfollah. 1995. Deterioration of languages and dialects: Stating the problem and finding a solution. Letters of the Academy of Sciences, Volume II.

版权所有 © Tazik K., Aliakbari M., 2023

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##