The meaning of welcome. Positive migration discourse

封面

如何引用文章

详细

Human e/migration across the Mediterranean increased significantly in the first part of the 21st century. At the mercy of people smugglers, migrants who succeed in crossing the seas face uncertain futures in Europe. Such immigration is at the heart of political debate in Europe, where right-wing populist parties have made significant gains because of their opposition to it. These parties tend to view human migration as a negative phenomenon, using familiar and by now even clichéd cultural and socio-political arguments against it. This study explores some of these discursive tropes. Rather than following studies that use a critical discourse paradigm, the paper’s main aim is to identify positive discourse and practice that might represent models for future behaviour in this context. It focuses on a discussion on recent migration involving Italy and, by applying tools of pragmatic analysis, united to knowledge of the socio-political background, traces some underlying trends in migrant reception. The data analysed were gathered by interviewing an Italian mayor who has attracted hostility from right-wing media for his novel approach to migrants, whose needs are met by finding them a place in the local social context. Findings suggest that, in certain circumstances, the migratory phenomenon may benefit not just the subjects involved but also the places concerned. The study thus foregrounds the degree to which welcoming the cultural other counters social discourses that currently appear triumphant in mainstream media and electoral processes.

作者简介

Douglas Ponton

University of Catania

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: dmponton@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9968-1162

Associate Professor of English Language and Translation at the Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Catania. His research interests include political discourse analysis, ecolinguistics, sociolinguistics, applied linguistics, pragmatics and critical discourse studies. He has held teaching and research positions at the universities of Catania, Messina and Pisa. His most recent research projects concern the Montalbano effect on tourism in Sicily, ecological questions in Sicily, and Sicilian dialect theatre. He is linguistic consultant for Vernon Press and is peer reviewer for numerous international journals.

Catania, Italy

参考

  1. Alaazi, Dominic A., Alphonse Ndem Ahola, Philomina Okeke-Ihejirika, Sophie Yohani, Helen Vallianatos & Bukola Salami. 2021. ‘Immigrants and the Western Media: A critical discourse analysis of newspaper framings of African immigrant parenting in Canada’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47 (19). 4478-4496. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1798746
  2. Angel-Ajani, Asale. 2000. ‘Italy’s Racial Cauldron: Immigration, criminalization and the cultural politics of race’. Cultural Dynamics 12 (3). 331-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 092137400001200304
  3. Bach, Kent. 2005. Context ex Machina. In Zoltan Gendler Szabo (ed), Semantics vs. pragmatics, 15-45. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  4. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Micha? Krzy?anowski, Tony McEnery & Ruth Wodak. 2008. ‘A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK Press’. Discourse & Society 19 (3). 273-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962
  5. Bello, Valeria. 2022. ‘The Role of Non-State Actors’ cognitions in the spiralling of the securitisation of migration: Prejudice, narratives and Italian CAS reception centres’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (6). 1462-1478. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851472
  6. Benton-Cohen, Katherine. 2018. Inventing the Immigration Problem: The Dillingham Commission and Its Legacy. Harvard University Press.
  7. Berg, Bruce L. 2007. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. London: Pearson.
  8. Blommaert, Jan & Jef Verschueren. 2022. ‘The Role of language in European nationalist ideologies’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA). 355-375. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.3.13blo
  9. Bobba, Giuliano & Duncan McDonnell. 2016. ‘Different types of Right-Wing populist discourse in government and opposition: The case of Italy’. South European Society and Politics 21 (3). 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1211239
  10. Cap, Piotr. 2017. The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Chouliaraki, Lilie & Pierluigi Musarò. 2017. ‘The mediatized border: Technologies and affects of migrant reception in the Greek and Italian borders’. Feminist Media Studies 17 (4). 535-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1326550
  12. Damelang, Andreas & Anette Haas. 2012. ‘The Benefits of migration: Cultural diversity and labour market success’. European Societies 14 (3). 362-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2012.676758
  13. van Dijk, Teun A. 2005. ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 349-371.
  14. Dines, Nick, Nicola Montagna & Vincenzo Ruggiero. 2015. ‘Thinking Lampedusa: Border construction, the spectacle of bare life and the productivity of migrants’. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (3). 430-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2014.936892
  15. Dörnyei, Zoltán. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantative, Qualitative and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Felice, Emanuele. 2018. ‘The socio-institutional divide: Explaining Italy’s long-term regional differences’. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 49 (1). 43-70. https://doi.org/10.1162/jinh_a_01231
  17. Fernandes, Jesus Maria, Alessia Rochira & Terri Mannarini. 2022. ‘Opposition to immigration: How people who identify with far?right discourses legitimize the social exclusion of immigrants’. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology casp.2634. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2634
  18. Fullin, Giovanna. 2016. ‘Labour market outcomes of immigrants in a South European Country: Do race and religion matter?’ Work, Employment and Society 30 (3). 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015575867
  19. Goodman, Simon & Steve Kirkwood. 2019. ‘Political and media discourses about integrating refugees in the UK’. European Journal of Social Psychology 49 (7). 1456-1470. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2595
  20. Goździak, Elzbieta M., Izabella Main & Brigitte Suter (eds.). 2020. Europe and the Refugee Response: A Crisis of Values? London; New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  21. Harring, Niklas, Sverker Jagers & Simon Matti. 2017. ‘Public support for pro-environmental policy measures: Examining the impact of personal values and ideology’. Sustainability 9 (5). 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050679
  22. Kaufmann, Eric. 2014. ‘“It’s the demography, stupid”: Ethnic change and opposition to immigration’. The Political Quarterly 85 (3). 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12090
  23. Kecskes, Istvan. 2016. ‘A dialogic approach to pragmatics’. Russian Journal of Linguistics 20 (4). 26-42. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2016-20-4-26-42
  24. Kerr, Sari Pekkala & William Kerr. 2011. Economic Impacts of Immigration: A Survey. w16736. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/ 10.3386/w16736
  25. Leontovich, Olga. 2015. Positive communication: Theoretical perspective. Russian Journal of Linguistics 1. 164-177.
  26. Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Lucano, Domenico & Marco Rizzo. 2020. Il Fuorilegge: La Lunga Battaglia Di Un Uomo Solo. Prima edizione in ‘ Serie Bianca.’ Milano: Giangiacomo Feltrinelli editore.
  28. Martin, J. R. 1999. ‘Grace: The logogenesis of freedom’. Discourse Studies 1 (1). 29-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001003
  29. Martin, J. R. & David Rose. 2003. Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the Clause. London; New York: Continuum.
  30. Massetti, Emanuele. 2015. ‘Mainstream parties and the politics of immigration in Italy: A structural advantage for the Right or a Missed Opportunity for the Left?’ Acta Politica 50 (4).486-505. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.29
  31. Mintchev, Nikolay. 2021. ‘The cultural politics of racism in the Brexit conjuncture’. International Journal of Cultural Studies 24 (1). 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920935135
  32. Oktar, Lütfiye. 2001. ‘The ideological organization of representational processes in the presentation of Us and Them’. Discourse & Society 12 (3). 313-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003003
  33. O’Regan, Veronica & Elaine Riordan. 2018. ‘Comparing the representation of refugees, asylum seekers and migrants in the Irish and UK press: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis’. Journal of Language and Politics 17 (6).744-768. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17043.ore
  34. Panebianco, Stefania. 2022. ‘The EU and migration in the Mediterranean: EU borders’ control by proxy’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (6). 1398-1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851468
  35. Peplow, Simon. 2019. ‘“In 1997 nobody had heard of windrush”: The rise of the “Windrush Narrative” in British newspapers’. Immigrants & Minorities 37 (3). 211-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619288.2020.1781624
  36. Ponton, Douglas Mark & Peter Mantello. 2018. Reaching breaking point: Right-wing migration rhetoric in mainstream media. In Mario Mignone (ed.), The challenges of migration in North America and Europe: Comparing policies and models of reception, 65-90. Stony Brook: Forum Italicum Publishing.
  37. Ragone, Marianna & Gennaro Avallone. 2022. ‘Migrant street vendors in Italy: A history of irregularized labour and people’. Revista Calitatea Vie?ii 33 (2). https://doi.org/10.46841/RCV.2022.02.05
  38. Ranci, Pippo. 2020. ‘Migrants to repopulate depopulated villages - Riace in Calabria, Italy and its mayor Mimmo Lucano’. Standing up for a Sustainable World. Edward Elgar Publishing. 309-313.
  39. Rinaldis, Antonio. 2016. Riace, Il Paese Dell’accoglienza: Un Modello Alternativo Di Integrazione. Reggio Emilia: Imprimatur.
  40. Sasso, Chiara. 2012. Riace, Terra di Accoglienza. Torino: Gruppo Abele.
  41. Schostak, John F. 2006. Interviewing and Representation in Qualitative Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  42. Scognamiglio, Annalisa. 2018. ‘When the mafia comes to town’. European Journal of Political Economy 55.573-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.05.005
  43. Sidnell, Jack & Tanya Stivers (eds.). 2013. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, a John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication.
  44. Sniderman, Paul M. (ed.). 2002. The Outsider: Prejudice and Politics in Italy. 2nd printing, and 1st paperback printing. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  45. Sohoni, Deenesh & Tracy W. P. Sohoni. 2014. ‘Perceptions of immigrant criminality: Crime and social boundaries’. The Sociological Quarterly 55 (1). 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/tsq.12039
  46. Stibbe, Arran. 2017. ‘Positive discourse analysis: Re-thinking human ecological relationships’. In Alwin Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 165-78. London: Routledge.
  47. Van Dijk, Teun, A. 2015. Ideology. In Mazzoleni Gianpietro (ed), The international encyclopedia of political communication. First Edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  48. Van Hooren, Franca 2010. When families need immigrants: The exceptional position of migrant domestic workers and care assistants in Italian immigration. Policy Bulletin of Italian Politics 2 (2). 21-38.
  49. Verschueren, Jef. 2012. Ideology in Language Use: Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  50. Vollmer, Bastian & Serhat Karakayali. 2018. ‘The volatility of the discourse on refugees in Germany’. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 16 (1-2). 118-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2017.1288284
  51. Widdowson, Henry G. 1995. ‘Discourse analysis: A critical view’. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 4 (3). 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709500400301
  52. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2015. ‘Outline of Relevance Theory’. HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business 3 (5). 35. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v3i5.21436
  53. Winter, Eugene O. 1977. ‘A clause-relational approach to English texts: A study of some predictive lexical items in written discourse’. Instructional Science 6 (1). 1-92.
  54. Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 6 Bonhill Street, London EC2A 4PU: SAGE Publications, Ltd.

版权所有 © Ponton D., 2023

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##