Politeness markers in emails of non-native English speaking university students

封面

如何引用文章

详细

The use of computer-mediated communication including emails has become pervasive in academic contexts as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. What seems to be significant but simply overlooked by students is meeting politeness netiquettes while sending emails. To this end, the current study investigated the extent to which non-native English speaking university students adjust the level of politeness in their response emails written in English to that of the emails received from an American professor. To collect data, four versions of an academic email message with different levels of politeness were prepared in advance. The emails either included or excluded verbal and structural politeness markers and asked for the participants’ demographic information and their reason for participation in the study. Then, 73 university students enrolled in a general English course were selected and divided randomly into four groups each of which received one version of the email message from the professor. The results of the data analysis on the participants’ response emails, based on accommodation theory (Giles 1973) as a theoretical framework, revealed that they did not accommodate either verbal or structural politeness cues in emails. Besides, the participants’ knowledge of the politeness etiquettes in the academic email genre seemed inadequate. Finally, the article provides some pedagogical implications for course designers, materials developers, and instructors to devise some plans to raise students’ awareness of email politeness etiquettes and for students to be aware of the significance of meeting politeness principles in their academic emails.

作者简介

Minoo Alemi

Islamic Azad University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: minooalemi2000@yahoo.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9703-831X

Associate Professor of Applied Linguistics at Islamic Azad University, West Tehran Branch, and a research associate at Sharif University of Technology (SUT), Tehran, Iran. She is associate editor of Applied Pragmatics Journal (John Benjamin). She has published papers in journals such as the Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, Language and Intercultural Communication, International Journal of Science and Engineering Ethics, among others. She is also the co-editor of Pragmatics Pedagogy in English as an International Language (Routledge, 2020).

Tehran, Iran

Zahra Maleknia

Islamic Azad University

Email: z619_maleknia@yahoo.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-5439-616X

Ph.D. in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL). She is a university instructor at Islamic Azad University, West Branch, Tehran, Iran. Her areas of interest focus on teacher identity, teacher professional development, critical pedagogy, English as an international language (EIL), and computer-mediated communication.

Tehran, Iran

参考

  1. Alemi, Minoo, Niayesh Pazoki Moakhar & Atefe Rezanejad. 2021. A cross-cultural study of condolence strategies in a computer-mediated social network. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (2). 417-442. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-2-417-442
  2. Almoaily, Mohammad. 2018. Greetings as a politeness strategy in EFL distance learning students' official emails. Linguistics and Literature Studies 6 (6). 259-266. https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2018.060601
  3. Biesenbach-Lucas, Sigrun. 2007. Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning & Technology 11 (2). 59-81.
  4. Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18 (2). 159-212. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0047404500013464
  5. Brown, Penelope & Steven Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Bunz, Ulla & Scott Campbell. 2004. Politeness accommodation in electronic mail. Communication Research Reports 21 (1). 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 08824090409359963
  7. Campillo, Patricia Salazar. 2018. Student-initiated email communication: An analysis of openings and closings by Spanish EFL learners. Sintagma 30 (2). 81-93. https://doi.org/10.21001
  8. Codina-Espurz, Victòria. 2021. The influence of social distance and power in email politeness in an academic context. Estudios Interlingüísticos 9 (1). 44-59.
  9. DiBartolomeo, Mgan. 2021. Pragmalinguistic variation in L2 Spanish e-mail requests: Learner strategies and instructor perceptions. In J. César Félix-Brasdefer & Rachel Shively (eds.), New directions in second language Pragmatics, 208-235. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
  10. Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2016. Variation in evaluations of the (im)politeness of emails from L2 learners and perceptions of the personality of their senders. Journal of Pragmatics 106 (1). 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.001
  11. Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria. 2018. “Mr Paul, please inform me accordingly”: Address forms, directness and degree. Pragmatics 28 (4). 489-515. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17025.eco
  12. Giles, Howard. 1973. Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15 (2). 87-105.
  13. Giles, Howard, Nikolas Coupland & Justine Coupland. 1991. Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Howard Giles, Justine Coupland & Nikolas Coupland (eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics, 1-69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Giles, Howard, Anthony Mulac, James J. Bradac & Patricia Johnson.1987. Speech accommodation theory: The first decade and beyond. In Margaret L. McLaughlin (ed.), Communication yearbook, 13-48. London: Sage.
  15. Giles, Howard & Philip M. Smith. 1979. Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence. In Howard Giles & Robert St. Clair (eds.), Language and social psychology, 45-65. Oxford: Blackwell.
  16. Níkleva, Dimitrinka. 2017. Markers of politeness and impoliteness in student-teacher interaction in the discourse genre of emails. Revista Signos Estudios de Linguistica 51 (97). 214-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S071809342018000200214
  17. Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
  18. Graham, Sage & Claire Hardaker. 2017. (Im)politeness in digital communication. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh & Daniel Z. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness, 785-814. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. Hashemian, Mahmood & Mayam Farhang-Ju. 2019. Applied linguistics faculty members’ perceptions of (im)politeness and (in)appropriateness of L2 learners’ e-mail requests. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS) 38 (1). 119-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2019.34578.2729
  20. Knonuk, Sümeyye. 2021. E-mail literacy in higher education academic settings. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies (IJELS) 9 (3). 29-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/ aiac.ijels.v.9n.3p.29
  21. Morand, David A. & Rosalie J. Ocker. 2003, January 6-9. Politeness theory and computer-mediated communication: A sociolinguistic approach to analyzing relational messages [Paper presentation]. 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA.
  22. Oandasan, Richard L. 2021. A pragmatic investigation of linguistic politeness and power relations in request emails. Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS) 9 (1). 21-45.
  23. Pham, Thi Minh & Aiden Ye. 2020. Politeness of Vietnamese students in writing request email in English: A course-based and socio-pragmatic study. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies 2 (2). 109-128. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v2i2.202
  24. Pratama, Hendi. 2019. Linguistic Politeness in Online Communication. Indonesia: LPPM Universitas Negeri Semarang.
  25. R. Eslami, Zohreh & Wei-Hong Ko. 2015. Facework in non-face-threatening emails by native and non-native English speakers. Russian Journal of Linguistics 1 (4). 111-226.
  26. Savić, Milica. 2019. Relational practices in Norwegian students’ e-mail requests in English: A focus on openings and closings. Journal of Intercultural Communication 49 (1). 1-29.
  27. Scotton, C Myers. 1980. Explaining linguistic choices as identity negotiations. In Howard Giles, William Peter Robinson & Philip M. Smith (eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives, 359-366. Oxford: Pergamon.
  28. Sykes, Julie M. 2021. Researching digital discourse in second language pragmatics. In J. César Félix-Brasdefer & Rachel Shively (eds.), New directions in second language pragmatics, 197-207. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

版权所有 © Alemi M., Maleknia Z., 2023

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##