Threat and fear: Pragmatic purposes of emotionalisation in media discourse

封面

如何引用文章

详细

The impact of mass media on individuals and society is to a great extent based on emotions. We concentrate on fear as it is one of the basic emotions triggered by risk and threat, which is claimed to play a key role in the twenty-first century consciousness (Furedi 20018). The study focuses on the emotionalisation of fear in contemporary media discourse about Russia, more specifically, on constructions of ‘Russian threat’ and ‘fear of Russia’ in Anglo-American media texts to highlight pragmatic effects and to speculate on possible purposes of such discourses. The study aims to explore the functioning of the lexemes threat and fear , in textual contexts with the focus on their pragma-discursive characteristics. It identifies the mechanisms as well as linguistic tools involved in media strategies of scare-mongering. The dataset was derived from quality British and American newspapers in the period 2018-2020, and was analysed drawing on an interdisciplinary approach combining critical discourse analysis, pragmatics, medialinguistics, psycholinguistics and the theory of proximisation. The paper argues that appealing to emotions as well as constructing emotions is aimed at enhancing the persuasive function of media and fulfilling their own agenda. The persistent use of the words ‘threat’ and ‘fear’ in relation to Russia as well as the obsessive discussion of this topic in media aim to shape a certain negative public opinion of Russia among readerships. The findings show that to achieve this goal different strategies and linguistic tools are used including: exaggeration, repetition, proximisation, interrogative headlines, presupposition, among others. The results go beyond linguistics, and may find implementation in political studies, since they provide researchers with tools for understanding contemporary social and political processes.

作者简介

Vladimir Ozyumenko

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ozyumenko-vi@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7587-3007

PhD, is Associate Professor at Law Institute, RUDN University. His research interests cover legal English, varieties of English, media discourse, critical discourse analysis, theory and practice of translation, intercultural communication. Contact information

6 Miklukho-Maklaya, Moscow, 117198, Russia

Tatiana Larina

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: larina-tv@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6167-455X

Doctor Habil., Full Professor at RUDN University. Her research interests embrace language, culture and communication; cross-cultural pragmatics, discourse analysis, communicative ethnostyles, and (im)politeness theory with the focus on English and Russian languages. She has authored and co-authored over 200 publications in Russian and English including monographs, course books, book chapters and articles in peer-reviewed journals.

6 Miklukho-Maklaya, Moscow, 117198, Russia

参考

  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2014. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. 2 ed-n. Routledge.
  2. Alba-Juez, Laura & Tatiana Larina. 2018. Language and emotion: Discourse-pragmatic perspectives. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (1). 9-37. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-9-37.
  3. Alba-Juez, Laura & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2019. Emotion, lies and bullshit in journalistic discourse: The case of fake news. Ibérica 38. 17-50.
  4. Alba-Juez, Laura & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2019. Emotion processes in discourse. In Mackenzie, J. Lachlan & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.). Emotion in Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 4-26.
  5. Altheide, David. 2002. Creating Fear: News and the Construction of a Crisis. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  6. Altheide, David L. 2006. Terrorism and the Politics of Fear. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press.
  7. Altheide, David & Sam Michalowski. 1999. Fear in the news: A discourse of control. The Sociological Quarterly 40 (3). 475-503.
  8. Bassols, Margarida, Anna Cros & Anna M. Torrent. 2013. Emotionalization in new television formats of science popularization. Pragmatics 23 (4). 605-632. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.4.02bas
  9. Baumeister, Roy, Vohs Kathleen, Nathan DeWall & Liqing Zhang. 2007. How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review 11 (2). 167-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301033
  10. Bell, Alan. 1996. The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.
  11. Bilá, Magdaléna & Svetlana V. Ivanova. 2020. Language, culture and ideology in discursive practices. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (2). 219-252. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-219-252
  12. Bryant, Jennings & Dolf Zillman (eds.). 2002. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  13. Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. John Benjamins.
  14. Cap, Piotr (ed.). 2017. The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/ 10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1
  15. Çınarlı, İnci & Sergül Nguyen. 2020. Mediating fear by breaking news: A case study of CNN Türk and NTV. In Nguyen D., Dekker I., Nguyen S. (eds.), Understanding Media and Society in the Age of Digitalisation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38577-4_7
  16. Delanty, Gerard. 2008. Fear of others: Social exclusion and the European crisis of solidarity. Social Policy and Administration 42(6). 676-690.
  17. Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2010. Emotions in Multiple Languages. Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2014. Culture and emotional language. In Sharifian, F. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. Routledge Handbooks in Linguistics, 357-370. Oxford: Routledge.
  19. Dillard, J. Price & Jason W. Anderson. 2004. The role of fear in persuasion. Psychology and Marketing 21 (11). 909-926.
  20. Dobrosklonskaya, Tatiana G. 2020. Medialingvistika: teoriya, metody, napravleniya [Medialinguistics: Theory, methods, directions]. Moscow: “KDU”, “Dobrosvet”. htpp://doi.org/10.31453/kdu.ru.91304.0107 (In Russ.)
  21. Dozier, Rush W. 1999. Fear itself: The origin and nature of the powerful emotion that shapes our lives and our world. Macmillan.
  22. Döveling, Katrin, Christian von Scheve & Elly A. Konijn (eds.). 2011. The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. London and New York: Routledge.
  23. Ewoldsen, David Roskos, Jessy H. Yu & Nancy Rhodes. 2004. Fear appeal messages effect accessibility of attitudes toward the threat and adaptive behaviors. Communication Monographs 71. 49-69.
  24. Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. Harlow: Longman.
  25. Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman.
  26. Fairclough, Norman. 2001. Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of CriticalDiscourse Analysis, 121-139. London: Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage
  27. Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News. London & New York: Routledge.
  28. Furedi, Frank. 2018. How Fear Works: Culture of Fear in the Twenty-First Century. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  29. Grupp, Stefanie. 2002. The political implications of a discourse of fear. MA Thesis. New York University.
  30. Isenberg, Nancy, David Silbersweig, Almut Engelien, Sylvia Emmerich, Kishor Malavade, Bradley Beattie, Andy C. Leon & Emily Stern. 1999. Linguistic threat activates the human amygdala. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States 96 (18). 10456-10459.
  31. Kara-Murza, Sergei G. 2015/2017. Manipulation of Consciousness. XXI Century. [Manipulyatsiya soznaniyem. Vek XXI]. Moscow: Algorithm. (In Rus.)
  32. Kopytowska, Monika. 2015a. Covering conflict: between universality and cultural specificity in news discourse genre and journalistic style. International Review of Pragmatics 7 (Special Issue on Communicative styles and genres: between universality and culture-specificity). 308-339
  33. Kopytowska, Monika. 2015b. Ideology of “here and now”. Mediating distance in television news. Critical Discourse Studies 12(3). 347-365
  34. Kopytowska, Monika & Paul Chilton. 2018. “Rivers of blood”: Migration, fear and threat construction. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14 (1). 133-161. Special issue on Narrating hostility, challenging hostile narratives. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2018-0007
  35. Larina, Tatiana, Vladimir Ozyumenko & Douglas M. Ponton. 2020. Persuasion strategies in media discourse about Russia: Linguistic ambiguity and uncertainty. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 15 (1). 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2019-0002
  36. Lerner, Julia & Michele Rivkin-Fish. 2021. On emotionalisation of public domains. Emotions and Society 3 (1). 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1332/263169021X16149420145743
  37. Lerner, Julia, Claudia Zbenovich & Tamar Kaneh-Shalit. 2021. Changing meanings of university teaching: The emotionalization of academic culture in Russia, Israel, and the USA. Emotions and Society. Special Issue Emotionalization of public domains. 3 (1). 73-93
  38. Mackenzie, J. Lachlan & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.). 2019. Emotion in Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
  39. Ozyumenko, Vladimir. 2017. Media discourse in an atmosphere of information warfare: From manipulation to aggression. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (1). 203-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-203-220. (In Russ.)
  40. Ozyumenko, Vladimir. 2019. Linguistic ambiguity in the media discourse as a strategy of formation of public opinion. Science Journal of VolSU. Linguistics. 3. 64-75. (In Russ.)
  41. Ozyumenko, Vladimir & Tatiana Larina. 2020. Discourse of threat as a strategy of emotional persuasion and manipulation. Proceedings of INTCESS 2020 - 7th International Conference on Education and Social Sciences 20-22 January, 2020 - DUBAI (UAE). 912-918
  42. Ozyumenko, Vladimir I. & Tatiana V. Larina. 2021. Pragmatic purposes of emotionalisation in media discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 25 (3). 746-766.
  43. Ponton, Douglas. 2016. Movement and meaning: Towards an integrated approach to political discourse analysis. Russian Journal of Linguistics 20 (4). 122-139.
  44. Ponton, Douglas & Tatiana Larina. 2016. Discourse analysis in the 21-th century: Theory and practice (I). Russian Journal of Linguistics. 20 (4). 7-25.
  45. Ponton, Douglas & Tatiana Larina. 2017. Discourse analysis in the 21-th century: Theory and practice (II). Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (1). 7-21.
  46. Richardson, John E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  47. Sedláková, Renáta & Monika Kopytowska. 2018. Different faces of the unknown: The media and the semiotics of fear. In Monika Kopytowska & Artur Gałkowski (eds.), Current Perspectives in Semiotics: Texts, Genres and Representations, 262-291. Frankfurt: Peter Lang
  48. Schwab, Frank. & Clemens. Schwender. 2011. The descent of emotions in media. Darwinian perspectives. In K. Döveling, Ch. von Sceve & E.A. Konijn (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media, 15-36. London and New York: Routledge
  49. Shakhovsky, Viktor I. I. 2008. Linguistic theory of emotions. Moscow: Gnozis Publ. (In Russ.)
  50. Sinelnikova, Lara N. 2020. The conceptual environment of the frontier discourse in humanities. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (2). 467-492. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24- 2-467-492 (In Russ.)
  51. Solopova, Olga A. & Maria S. Saltykova. 2019. Constructing the ideal future in foreign military media discourses of the World War II period. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (3). 762-783. doi: 10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-762-783
  52. Trajkova, Zorica. 2020. Media fraiming of the Macedonia name change issue: The use of fear-inducing language strategies. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 16 (2). 265-284
  53. Tunney, Carin, Esther Thorson & Weiyue Chen. 2021. Following and avoiding fear-inducing news topics: Fear intensity, perceived news topic importance, self-efficacy, and news overload. Journalism Studies 22 (5). 614-632
  54. van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society 17 (2). 359-383.
  55. van Dijk, Teun. 2009. Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  56. Weiss, Gilbert & Ruth Wodak (eds.). 2007. Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. London, Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  57. Wierzbicka, Anna 1999. Emotions Across Languages and Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  58. Wirth, Werner & Holger Schramm. 2005. Communication Research Trends. Centre for the Study of Communication and Culture 24 (3). 1-39.
  59. Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.
  60. Wodak, Ruth. 2021. The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. 2-nd. London: SAGE Publications.
  61. Zappettini, Franco. 2021.The tabloidization of the Brexit campaign: Power to the (British) people? Journal of Language and Politics 20 (2). 277-303.
  62. Trace, Michael. Never forget the Trump-Russia moral panic: By fearmongering far beyond the evidence, the media and politicians did a huge disservice to the public. https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-oped-never-forget-the-trump-russia-moral-panic-20190325-i3vgecetwvcqdmuzhuv5dyt22i-story.html NEW YORK DAILY NEWS | MAR 25, 2019 AT 4:05 PM
  63. APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/fear
  64. Oxford Reference. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095812704
  65. Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners. 2002. Macmillan Education

版权所有 © Ozyumenko V., Larina T., 2021

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##