Language, culture and ideology in discursive practices

封面

如何引用文章

详细

Discursive practices are looked upon as the core notion of discourse theory and the main instrument linguists can operate with studying language in connection with society and a human being. In this introductory article we will look into how language, culture and ideology are intertwined in diverse discursive practices and how these practices are shaped by people representing various cultures, ideologies and social entities. As part of linguistic discourse theory, we will briefly outline the major objectives and tenets of discourse theory or discourse analysis and track down the reasons why discourse theory turned into a dominant linguistic paradigm in the new millennium. Besides, some light will be thrown on the advancements and debatable questions arising within discourse theory as reflected in its methodology. Then we will give a brief synopsis of each individual paper and highlight theoretical and methodological contributions and innovations proposed by our authors. The results of the discussion as well as a brief outlook on future research will be summed up at the end of the introductory article.

作者简介

Magdaléna Bilá

University of Prešov

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: magdalena.bila@unipo.sk

Dr. of Philology, Full Professor at the Institute of British and American Studies, Faculty of Arts

Prešov, Slovakia

Svetlana Ivanova

Pushkin Leningrad State University

Email: svet_victoria@mail.ru

Dr. of Philology, Full Professor, Head of English Philology Department

Saint Petersburg, Russia

参考

  1. Alba-Juez, Laura & Tatiana V. Larina. 2018. Language and emotion: Discourse-pragmatic perspectives. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (1). 9-37.
  2. Alexander, Richard & Arran Stibbe. 2014. From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language Sciences 41. 104-110.
  3. Beard, Adrian. 2000. The Language of Politics. NY: Routledge.
  4. Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: a text-driven approach. Text and Talk 26 (6). 635-660.
  5. Bell, Allan & Peter Garett. 1998. Approaches of media discourse. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  6. Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Bacchi, Carol & Jennifer Bonham. 2014. Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications. Foucault Studies 17. 173-192.
  8. Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  9. Bousfield, Derek & Miriam A. Locher (eds.). 2008. Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Inter-play with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  10. Cap, Piotr & Urszula Okulska. 2013. Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice. John Benjamins Publishing.
  11. Chernyavskaya, Valeria E. 2017. Metodologitscheskie vosmoznosti diskursivnogo analiza v korpusnoi lingvistike [Towards methodological application of discourse analysis in corpus-driven linguistics]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology 50. 135-148. doi: 10.17223/19986645/50/9.
  12. Chernyavskaya, Valeria E. 2018. Diskursivnyy analiz i korpusnyye metody: neobkhodimoye dokazatel'noye zveno? Ob"yasnitel'nyye vozmozhnosti kachestvennogo i kolichestvennogo podkhodov [Discourse analysis and corpus approaches: a missing evidence-based link? Towards qualitative and quantitative approaches]. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki 2. 31-37. doi: 10.20916/1812-3228-2018-2-31-37
  13. Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. NY: Routledge. Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press. Christie, Frances. 2002. Classroom Discourse Analysis. A Functional Perspective. London, New York: Continuum
  14. Cook, Guy. 1992. The Discourse of Advertising. London and New York: Routledge.
  15. Corbett, James. 2009. Genre and Genre Analysis. In Jacob L. Mey (eds.), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. 2nd edn. Oxford: Elsevir Ltd.
  16. Crystal, David. 2010. Internet Linguistics. London, New York: Routledge.
  17. Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2017. Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. London: Palgrave.
  19. Dementyev, Vadim. 2016. Speech genres and discourse: Genres study in discourse analysis paradigm. Russian Journal of Linguistics 20 (4). 103-121.
  20. Dobrosklonskaya, Tatiana G. 2014. Massmedijnyj diskurs kak ob"ekt nauchnogo opisaniya [Mass media discourse as an object of scientific description]. Nauchnye vedomosti. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki 13 (184). 22. 181-187.
  21. Dolník, Ján. 2015. Človek - jazyk - kultúra. Kaligram.
  22. Dubrovskaya, Tatiana. 2017. Metapragmatics of Аdministering Justice in Russian and English Judicial Discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (1). 73-90.
  23. Dubrovskaya, Tatiana & Evgeniy Kozhemyakin. 2016. Media construction of Russia’s international relations: specifics of representations. Critical Discourse Studies 14 (1). 90-107. doi: 10.1080/17405904.2016.1196228.
  24. Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome. Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
  25. Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press. Fairclough, Norman. 2001. The dialectics of discourse. Textus 2 (14). 231-242.
  26. Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
  27. Fairclough, Norman. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. 2nd edn. Harlow: Longman.
  28. Fairclough, Norman. 2014. Language and Power. 3rd edn. Routledge.
  29. Fernández-Amaya, Lucía. 2019. Disagreement and (im)politeness in a Spanish family members’ WhatsApp group. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (4). 1065-1087. doi: 10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-4-1065-1087.
  30. Foucault, Michel. 1981. The Order of Discourse. In Robert Young (eds.), Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader, 51-78. Boston, London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  31. Foucault, Michel. 1994. The Order of Things. An Archeology of the Human Sciences: A translation of Les Mots et les choses. New York: Vintage Books, a Division of Random House Inc.
  32. Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News. London & New York: Routledge.
  33. Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina & Gloria Álvarez-Benito. 2016. A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse: The Andalusian Parliament. John Benjamins.
  34. Fullagar, Simone. 2002. Governing the healthy body: Discourses of leisure and lifestyle within Australian health policy. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine 6 (1). 69-84
  35. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010. A genre approach to the study of im-politeness. International Review of Pragmatics 2. 46-94
  36. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar & Maria Sifianou. 2019. Im/politeness and discursive pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 145. 91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.015
  37. Gee, James Paul. 2007. Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York and London: Routledge
  38. Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka. 2014. Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages, and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  39. Good, Byron J. & Mary-Jo Del Vecchio Good. 1981. The Semantics of Medical Discourse. In Everett Mendelsohn & Yehuda Elkana (eds.), Sciences and Cultures. Sociology of the Sciences a Yearbook. 5. Springer, Dordrecht
  40. Goodrich, Peter. 1987. Legal Discourse. London: Macmillan Press
  41. Gorter, Durk. 2006. Introduction: The Study of the Linguistic Landscape as a New Approach to Multilingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism 3 (1). 1-6
  42. Gotti, Maurizio & Christopher Williams. 2003. Legal Discourse across Languages and Cultures. Peter Lang
  43. Hagege, Claude. 1985. L'Homme de paroles. Paris: Fayard. Harris, Zellig. S. 1952. Discourse Analysis. Language 28. 1-30
  44. He, Agnes Weiyun. 2003. Discourse Analysis. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (eds.), The Handbook of Linguistics. Blackwell Publishing
  45. Hyland, Ken. 2009. Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. Continuum
  46. Issers, Oxana S. 2011. Diskursivnaya praktika kak nablyudayemaya real’nost’ [Discursive practice as an observable reality]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta 4. 227-232
  47. Ivanova, Svetlana V. 2017. Commencement Speech as a Hybrid Polydiscursive Practice. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (1). 141-160
  48. Ivanova, Svetlana V. 2019. Stylistics and rhetoric of lifestyle discourse. Professional Discourse & Communication 1 (2). 8-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2019-1-2-8-21
  49. Jaworski, Adam & Crispin Thurlow. 2010. Tourism Discourse. Language and Global Mobility. Palgrave Macmillan UK
  50. Johnstone, Barbara. 2018. Discourse Analysis. 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
  51. Jørgensen, Marianne & Louise Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications, Ltd
  52. Kalyango Jr., Yusuf & Monika Kopytowska (eds.). 2014. Why discourse matters: Negotiating identity in the mediatized world. Peter Lang: New York
  53. Karasik, Vladimir. 2002. Yazykovoj krug: lichnost', koncepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse]. Volgograd: Peremena
  54. Kibrik, Andrei. A. 2009. Modus, zanr i parametry klassifikacii diskursov [Modus, genre and other parameters of discourse classification]. Voprosy Yazykoznanyja 2. 3-21. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://iling-ran.ru/kibrik/Discourse_classification@VJa_2009.pdf (Accessed 01 March 2019)
  55. Koshkarova, Natalya N. 2019. Linguistic, Pragmatic, and Stylistic Peculiarities of 2018 FIFA World Cup Representation in British Media-Discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (3). 802-819. doi: 10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-802-819
  56. Langlotz, Andreas & Miriam A. Locher. 2017. (Im)politeness and emotion. In Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, 287-322. London: Palgrave
  57. Larina, Tatiana V., Vladimir I. Ozyumenko & Svetlana Kurteš. 2017. I-identity vs we-identity in language and discourse: Anglo-Slavonic perspectives. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13 (1). 195-215
  58. Larina, Tatiana, Vladimir Ozyumenko & Douglas Mark Ponton. 2019. Persuasion strategies in media discourse about Russia: linguistic ambiguity and uncertainty. Lodz papers in Pragmatics 15 (1) 3-22. DOI: https://doi .org/10.1515/lpp-2019-0002
  59. Larina, Tatiana & Douglas M. Ponton (forthcoming). Tact or frankness: Intercultural pragmatics in the blind peer review genre. Intercultural Pragmatics
  60. Leontovich, Olga A. 2019. New forms of urban discourse as a reflection of social change. Communication Studies (Russia) 6 (3). 645-654. doi: 10.25513/2413-6182.2019
  61. Locher, Miriam A. 2017. Reflective Writing in Medical Practice: A Linguistic Perspective. Bristol: MultilingualMatters
  62. Locher, Miriam A. & Tatiana V. Larina. 2019. Introduction to politeness and impoliteness research in global contexts. Russian Journal of Linguistics 23 (4). 873-903. doi: 10.22363/2312-91822019-23-4-873-903
  63. Macdonald, Myra. 2003. Exploring Media Discourse (Understanding Media Series). London: Arnold.
  64. Mackenzie, J. Lachlan & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.). 2019. Emotion in Discourse. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 302. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  65. Matheson, Donald. 2005. Media Discourses: Analysing Media Texts. Open University Press. Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  66. Molodychenko, Evgeni. 2016. Cennosti i ocenka v diskurse konsyumerizma: lingvopragmaticheskij i kriticheskij analiz [Values and evaluation in discourse of consumerism: a pragmalinguistic analysis]. Filologiya. 122-130. doi: 10.17238/issn2227-6564. 2016.3.122.
  67. Molodychenko, Evgeni. 2020. Metasemiotic projects and lifestyle media: Formulating commodities as resources for identity enactment. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (1). 117-136. doi: 10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-1-117-136
  68. Montgomery, Martin. 2007. Discourse of Broadcast News: A Linguistic Approach. Routledge
  69. Naydenova, Natalia S. 2018. Modern linguistics through post-secular perspective. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (4). 988-1000. doi: 10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-4 988-1000
  70. Nefedov, Sergei T. & Valeria E. Сhernyavskaya. 2020. Context in linguistics: pragmatic and discourse analytical dimension. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology 63. 83-97. doi: 10.17223/19986645/63/5
  71. Nunan David. 1993. Introducing Discourse Analysis. London: Penguin English
  72. Olyanich, Andrey V. 2003. Gastronomicheskiy diskurs v sisteme massovoy kommunikatsii: semantiko-semioticheskiye kharakteristiki [Gastronomic discourse in the system of mass communication: semantic-semiotic specifications]. Massovaya kul'tura na rubezhe XX-XXI vekov: chelovek i ego diskurs, 167-201. Moscow
  73. Ozyumenko, Vladimir. 2017. Media discourse in an atmosphere of information warfare: From manipulation to aggression. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21(1). 203-220.
  74. Ponton, Douglas. 2016. Movement and meaning: Towards an integrated approach to political discourse analysis. Russian Journal of Linguistics 20 (4). 122 -139.
  75. Ponton, Douglas & Tatiana V. Larina. 2016. Discourse analysis in the 21st century: Theory and practice (I). Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (1). 7-25.
  76. Ponton, Douglas & Tatiana V. Larina. 2017. Discourse analysis in the 21st century: Theory and practice (II). Russian Journal of Linguistics 20 (4). 7-21.
  77. Talbot, Mary. 2007. Media Discourse: Representation and Interaction. Edinburgh University Press
  78. van Dijk, Teun A. (eds.). 1985. Discourse and Communication. New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication. Series: Research in Text Theory 10. De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852141
  79. van Dijk, Teun A. 1988. News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  80. van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, Routledge, 11 (2). 115-140.
  81. van Dijk, Teun A. 2009. Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge University Press.
  82. van Dijk, Teun A. (eds.). 2011. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary introduction. SAGE
  83. Resta, Simonetta. 1998. Words and social change. The impact of power and ideology on the language of Economics and Law, Asp 19-22. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/asp/2760. (Accessed 14 March 2020). DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.2760
  84. Saville-Troike, Muriel. 1994. Communicative Competence. In Ronald E. Asher (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 2. 538. Oxford, New York, Seoul, Tokyo: Pergamon Press
  85. Schiffrin, Deborah. 1995. Approaches to Discourse. Blackwell
  86. Shahovsky, Victor I. 2015. Golos emotsiy v yazykovom kruge homo sentiens [Voice of emotion in the linguistic circle of homo sentiens]. 3rd edn. Moscow: Knizhnyj dom «LIBROKOM» Publ
  87. Shakhovsky, Victor I. 2018. The Cognitive Matrix of Emotional-Communicative Personality. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (1). 54-79. doi: 10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-54-79
  88. Sheigal, Elena. 2004. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Political discourse semiotics]. Moscow: Gnozis
  89. Sériot, Patrick. 1999. Kak chitayut teksty vo Francii [How they read texts in France].
  90. Kvadratura smysla. Frantsuskaya škola analiza diskursa, 12-53. M.: Progress.
  91. Sériot, Patrick. 2012. Structure and the Whole. East, West and Non-Darwinian Biology in the Origins of Structural Linguistics / Translated from French by Amy Jacobs-Colas. Mouton De Gruyter.
  92. Skålén, Per, Martin Fougère & Markus Fellesson. 2008. Marketing Discourse: A Critical Perspective. London & New York: Routledge.
  93. Solopova, Olga & Anatoly Chudinov. 2018. Diachronic Analysis of Political Metaphors in the British Corpus: from Victory Bells to Russia’s V-Day. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22 (2). 313-337. doi: 10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-2-313-337
  94. Titscher, Stefan, Michael Meyer, Ruth Wodak & Eva Vetter. 2000. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis: In Search of Meaning. 1st edn. SAGE Publications Ltd
  95. Unger, Johann W. 2016. The interdiciplinarity of critical discourse studies research. Palgrave communications.
  96. Watts, Richard. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge. Cambridge University press.
  97. Williams, Glyn. 1999. French Discourse Analysis. The method of post-structuralism. London and New York: Routledge.
  98. Yule, George. 1999. The Study of Language. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
  99. Бобырева Е.В. Религиозный дискурс: ценности, жанры, стратегии: (на материале православного вероучения). Волгоград: Перемена, 2007
  100. Дементьев В.В. Жанры речи и дискурс: место жанроведческих исследований в парадигме дискурс-анализа // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2016. Т. 20. № 4. С. 103-121
  101. Добросклонская Т.Г. Массмедийный дискурс как объект научного описания // Научные ведомости. Серия Гуманитарные науки. 2014. № 13 (184). Вып. 22. С. 181-187
  102. Дубровская Т.В. Метапрагматика осуществления правосудия в дискурсе российских и английских судей // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2017. Т. 21. № 1. С. 73-90.
  103. Иванова С.В. Актовая речь как гибридная полидискурсивная практика // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2017. Т. 21. № 1. С. 141-160.
  104. Иванова С.В. Стилистика и риторика лайфстайл-дискурса // Дискурс профессиональной коммуникации. 2019. № 1 (2). С. 8-21.
  105. Иссерс О.С. Дискурсивная практика как наблюдаемая реальность // Вестник Омского университета. 2011. № 4. С. 227-232.
  106. Карасик В.И. Языковой круг: личность, концепты, дискурс. Волгоград, 2002.
  107. Кибрик А.А. Модус, жанр и другие параметры классификации дискурсов. Вопросы языкознания. 2009. № 2. С. 3-21. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://iling-ran.ru/kibrik/ Discourse_classification@VJa_2009.pdf (дата обращения: 01.03.2020)
  108. Кошкарова Н.Н. Лингвопрагматические и жанрово-стилистические особенности репрезентации чемпионата мира по футболу 2018 г. в британском медиадискурсе // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2019. Т. 23. № 3. С. 802-819. doi: 10.22363/2312 9182-2019-23-3-802-819
  109. Леонтович О.А. Новые формы урбанистического дискурса и их социальные истоки // Коммуникативные исследования. 2019. Т. 6. № 3. С. 645-654. doi: 10.25513/2413 6182.2019.6(3).645-654
  110. Молодыченко Е.Н. Ценности и оценка в дискурсе консюмеризма: лингво-прагматический и критический анализ // Филология. 2016. С. 122-130. doi: 10.17238/issn22276564.2016.3.122
  111. Молодыченко Е.Н. Метасемиотические проекты и лайфстайл-медиа: дискурсивные механизмы превращения предметов потребления в ресурсы выражения идентичности // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2020. Т. 24. № 1. С. 117-136. doi: 10.22363/26870088-2020-24-1-117-136
  112. Найденова Н.С. Современная лингвистика в постсекулярной перспективе // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2018. Т. 22. № 4. С. 988-1000. doi: 10.22363/2312-9182-2018 22-4-988-1000
  113. Нефедов С.Т., Чернявская В.Е. Контекст в лингвистическом анализе: прагматическая и дискурсивно-аналитическая перспектива // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2020. № 63. 83-97. doi: 10.17223/19986645/63/5
  114. Олянич А.В. Гастрономический дискурс в системе массовой коммуникации: семантикосемиотические характеристики // Московская культура на рубеже XX-XXI веков: человек и его дискурс. М.: Институт языкознания РАН, 2003. С.167-201
  115. Озюменко В.И. Медийный дискурс в ситуации информационной войны: от манипуляции - к агрессии // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2017. Т. 21. № 1. С. 203-220
  116. Серио П. Как читают тексты во Франции // Квадратура смысла: Французская школа анализа дискурса. М.: Прогресс, 1999. С.12-53
  117. Солопова О.А., Чудинов А.П. Диахронический анализ метафор в британском корпусе текстов: колокола победы и Russia’s V-Day // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2018. Т. 22. № 2. С. 313-337
  118. Чернявская В.Е. Методологические возможности дискурсивного анализа в корпусной лингвистике // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Филология. 2017. 50. 135-148. doi: 10.17223/19986645/50/9
  119. Чернявская В.Е. Дискурсивный анализ и корпусные методы: необходимое доказательное звено? Объяснительные возможности качественного и количественного подходов // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. 2018. № 2. С. 31-37. doi: 10.20916/1812-32282018-2-31-37
  120. Шаховский В.И. Голос эмоций в языковом круге homo sentiens. Изд. 3-е, стер. М.: Книжный дом «ЛИБРОКОМ», 2015
  121. Шаховский В.И. Когнитивная матрица эмоционально-коммуникативной личности // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2018. Т. 22. № 1. С. 54-79. doi: 10.22363/2312-9182 2018-22-1-54-79
  122. Шейгал Е.И. Семиотика политического дискурса. М.: Гнозис, 2004

版权所有 © Bilá M., Ivanova S., 2020

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##