Air temperature changes due to altitude above sea level in the Northern Ural Mountains

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The research is devoted to an urgent modern problem: the identification of temperature factors that limit the distribution and survival of plants in the mountainous conditions of the Northern Urals. The article’s aim is to determine the air temperature in four altitudinal zones of the southern part of the Northern Urals (Sverdlovsk region 59º30´N, 59º15´E) and to identify regression relationships of the obtained temperature data with control temperature data from the nearest meteorological station. Registration of air temperatures was carried out from May to September 2019 around the clock, every two hours in the mountain forest zone (at an altitude of 460 and 640 m above sea level) under the canopy of Siberian stone pine forests, in the zone of subalpine woodlands with elements of mountain forest tundra (820 m above sea level) and on a plateau in the mountain tundra zone (1030 m above sea level). It has been established that the change in air temperature at different altitude levels and at the nearest meteorological station (far from 60 km, at an altitude of 202 m above sea level) occurs relatively synchronously. Difference between average daily temperatures at altitudes of 460, 640, 820 and 1030 m above sea level and the control data of the meteorological station is 2.2, 3.0, 4.7 and 5.1ºC respectively. For all altitude levels, a reliable close straight-line relationship between average daily air temperatures and meteorological station data has been established. The altitudes of 460, 640, 820 and 1030 m above sea level correspond to the coefficients of determination ( R 2) equal to 0.96, 0.95, 0.92 and 0.88. The relationship of the minimum temperatures of the corresponding altitude levels with the control data is also quite high ( R 2 is not lower than 0.7). With the help of the identified relationships and the obtained regression equations, it is possible to retrospectively restore the dynamics of the thermal regime according to the meteorological station data for mountain habitats of different altitudes in the southern part of the Northern Urals over a long period. Including extreme critical temperatures, which act as factors limiting the resettlement and survival of plants and determine the ecosystem biodiversity.

Full Text

Introduction The importance of the biospheric role of mountain ecosystems is recognized by many researchers [1; 2]. Distinguished by significant biological diversity, they also perform water-regulating functions, on which half of the world’s population depends [3]. At the same time, mountain ecosystems are most sensitive to external influences, including climate change [1; 3-5]. Therefore, since the second half of the 20th century, due to progressive climate change, the problem of vegetation dynamics in extreme mountainous conditions has been one of the priority areas of modern environmental research [2; 6-8]. Numerous studies confirm that climate change can go beyond the adaptive capacity of natural vegetation [9-12] and there will be a threat of catastrophic changes in biodiversity, loss of stability of both local ecosystems and the biosphere as a whole [4; 10; 13; 14]. For the Urals, which performs the water-regulating functions of two large water basins (Volga-Kama and Ob), this problem is especially acute. Presumably due to climatic changes, in the last 30-50 years, intensive settlement and survival of forest-forming woody plants above the existing mountain treeline ecotone have been observed in the Northern Urals [15; 16]. To retrospect climate changes and their impact on the growth and development of woody plants under extreme conditions of the upper treeline ecotone, mainly dendrochronological analysis is used in combination with temperature data from regional meteorological stations [17-19]. Despite the fact that this analysis has proven itself well, it cannot be used to obtain complete information on the initial stage of the formation of dendrocenoses. Data of weather stations, sometimes located at a considerable distance, do not always make it possible to identify regional and landscape features of climatic conditions for mountain systems. Therefore, the necessary information for developing predictive models of ecosystem dynamics is sometimes not enough. Reliable long-term multi-altitude data on mountain climate, which allow checking regional climate models, exist only for very few areas, such as the European Alps [3; 20]. Therefore, the problem of identifying factors that limit the survival and distribution of plants and animals in mountainous conditions remains unresolved. The article’s aim is to establish regression relationships between the data of thermal data loggers installed in four altitudinal zones of the Northern Urals, including in the conditions of mountain tundra above the treeline ecotone, with the temperature data of the nearest weather station. In the future, the justification of the methodology reconstructed on the basis of these relationships for studying the dynamics of Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) and related species renewal above the existing upper treeline ecotone, in connection with the annual dynamics of air and the upper soil horizon temperature. Objects The studies were carried out for four years (2016-2019) from May to October in the southern part of the main watershed of the Northern Urals (Sverdlovsk region) at four altitudinal levels (Table 1) of Mount “Tri Bugra” (altitude 1060 m above sea level (a.s.l.) 59º30 ´N, 59º15´E): in the mountain-taiga zone under the canopy of Siberian stone pine forest at altitudes of 460 m a.s.l. (P1) and 640 m a.s.l. (P2); in the zone of subalpine woodlands with elements of mountain forest tundra at an altitude of 820 m a.s.l. (P3); on a plateau in the mountain tundra zone at an altitude of 1030 m a.s.l. (P4). The nearest control meteorological station is located at a distance of 60 km from the objects of study in Karpinsk town (59º46´N, 60º00´E at an altitude of 202 m a.s.l.). In the low-mountain zone in the grass-green-moss forest type, the forest stand is represented by Picea obovata Ledeb. 30%, Pinus sibirica 20%, Pinus sylvestris L. 20%, Abies sibirica Ledeb. 10%, Populus tremula L. 20%. In the mid-mountain zone, also in the grass-green-moss forest type, the forest stand is represented by Pinus sibirica 60%, Picea obovata 30%, Abies sibirica 10% and slightly Betula pendula Roth. Subalpine woodlands of grass-stony forest type are represented by Pinus sibirica 70%, Picea obovata 20%, Betula pendula 10%. In the zone of mountain stony shrub-moss-lichen tundra in the last 30-50 years, there has been an abundant renewal of Pinus sibirica [16]. The total number of its undergrowth not older than 55 years with an average height of 27 cm is 6.0 thousand ind./ha. The undergrowth of other woody forest-forming species is single. Table 1. Characteristics of research objects № Altitude, m above sea level (a.s.l.) Mountain zone Average forest stand parameters H, m D, cm S, m2 C, % P1 460 Low-mountain taiga 24 28 39.5 75 P2 640 Mid-mountain taiga 18 32 22.4 60 P3 820 Subalpine taiga 6.5 20 11 28 P4 1030 Mountain tundra - - - - Notes. H, m - average stand height, m; D, cm - average stem diameter at a height of 1.3 m, cm; S, m2 - basal area, m2; C, % - crown projective cower of the forest canopy, %. Methods Altitude above sea level (a.s.l.) was determined using a GPS navigator. Recording of air temperatures at a height of 2 m (with microclimatic sun protection) from the soil surface and soil at a depth of 5 cm was carried out by thermal data loggers installed at the corresponding altitude levels around the clock every two hours. Based on the obtained time series of temperature dynamics, the following indicators were calculated: average daily temperature; the number of days with an average daily temperature above 5 and 10ºC and below 0ºC; the sum of positive average daily temperatures; average temperature for the summer observation period (from May 21 to August 31); difference of average daily temperatures at altitude levels with the control data of the weather station. On the basis of regression analysis, a study was made of the relationship between air temperatures at high-altitude levels and weather stations. The article presents the results of research in 2019. Results Table 2 summarizes the results of observations from May 21 to August 31, 2019. As the location of measurements increases, there is a decrease in average daily air temperatures and, accordingly, an increase in the difference with the weather station data. Table 2. The main temperature parameters in the studied altitude zones for the period from May 21 to August 31 in 2019 Mountain zone Altitude, m above sea level M 202 P1 460 P2 640 P3 820 P4 1030 Nd with t° > 5°C 100 98 96 88 85 Nd with t° > 10°С 86 73 67 57 50 Nd with t° < 0°С - - - 3 3 ∑ (+t°С) 1479.1 1249.2 1170.6 1004.2 962.1 t°C average for the summer period 14.8 12.5 11.8 10.1 9.8 t°C min -2.0 -2.5 -3.0 -5.0 -6.0 t°C max +31.4 +25.5 +24.5 +23.5 +23.0 The difference between average daily temperatures in high-altitude zones (P) with weather station data (M) - 2.2±0.09 3.0±0.01 4.7±0.12 5.1±0.15 Notes. M - control date of the meteorological station; Nd - days number of the average daily temperature; t° - temperature, degrees C°; ∑ (+t°С) - the sum of the positive average daily temperature. Possible impact on temperature data at 460 and 640 m a.s.l. renders the insolating surface of the tree canopy (crown projective cower is about 70%). In subalpine woodlands at an altitude of 820 m a.s.l., crowns of sparse trees do not form a continuous closed canopy (crown projective cower is not more than 30%), and there are no trees in the mountain tundra (1030 m a.s.l.). Nevertheless, the change in air temperature at different altitude levels occurs relatively synchronously (Figure 1). Figure 1. Dynamics of the average daily temperature (T, °C) in the corresponding altitude zone: P1 - 460 m a.s.l.; P2 - 640 m a.s.l.; P3 - 820 m a.s.l.; P4 - 1030 m a.s.l.; M - control date of meteorological station The warmest period (about 40 days long) is observed from June 21 to July 31. In addition, two short (no more than 10 days) warm periods were observed (including in the mountain tundra at an altitude of 1030 m a.s.l.) in early June (June 1-10) and in mid-August (August 11-20). At the same time, for all high-altitude levels, a reliable close straight-line relationship was established between the average daily air temperatures recorded by thermal data loggers and the weather station data (Figure 2 a, c, e, g). For altitudes of 460, 640 and 820 m a.s.l., the coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.96, 0.95 and 0.92, respectively, for an altitude of 1030 m a.s.l. already only 0.88. The resulting regression equations for average daily temperatures (Figure 2 a, c, e, g) indicate the following facts. Firstly, with an increase in altitude above sea level, the coefficients “a” at the value of x increase from 0.91 at an altitude of 460 m a.s.l. to 0.99 at an altitude of 1030 m a.s.l. At the same time, they are close to one for all studied altitudinal zones. Secondly, the coefficient “b” in the equation increases from 0.87 at altitude 460 m a.s.l. to 4.93 at an altitude of 1030 m a.s.l., i.e. more than 5.5 times. This indicates that the differences in temperature with the weather station data are characterized mainly by the free term of the equation “b”. Thirdly, the tightness of the revealed dependencies remains quite high for all the studied altitudinal zones. Despite the manifestation of sudden temperature changes with an increase in the terrain altitude, which reduce the tightness of established connections. y = 0.99x - 4.93 R^2 = 0.88 y = 0.83x - 1.67 R^2 = 0.7 y = 0.91x - 0.87 R^2 = 0.96 y = 0.88x - 0.63 R^2 = 0.89 y = 0.94x - 2.11 R^2 = 0.95 y = 0.85x - 0.42 R^2 = 0.86 y = 0.96x - 4.08 R^2 = 0.92 y = 0.82x - 1.52 R^2 = 0.79 Figure 2. Dependence of the average and minimum daily air temperatures (t) in the corresponding altitudinal zones (P) on the temperature at the weather station (M) Additionally, we investigated the relationship of the minimum daily temperatures depending on the altitude above sea level (Figure 2 b, d, f, h) with the control data of the weather station. The indicators under study are important for understanding the expansion and contraction of the ranges of plant species, their survival and differentiation of vegetation into altitudinal zones. For the average daily minimum (Figure 2 b, d, f, h), there was a tendency for the values of the coefficients “a” to decrease at the value of x with an increase in altitude above sea level (from 0.88 at an altitude of 460 m a.s.l. to 0.83 at an altitude of 1030 m a.s.l.). In general, the tightness of the relationship between the minimum temperatures of all the studied altitudinal zones and the weather station data also remains high (R2 does not fall below 0.7). A more detailed analysis of frosts showed that during the measurement period from May 21 to August 31, 2019 (103 days) in the zone of subalpine woodlands (P3) at an altitude of 820 m a.s.l. and in the mountain tundra zone (P4) at an altitude of 1030 m a.s.l. three days were observed (May 21, 24, and 25) with average daily negative temperatures. At the lower altitudes (460 m a.s.l. (P1) and 640 m a.s.l. (P2)) these days, the average daily air temperature remained positive (0.5-1.7ºС), but at night it dropped to -3.0ºC. In addition, at altitudes of 820 (P3) and 1030 m a.s.l. (P4) two summer night frosts were revealed: June 13 (up to -2.0ºС) and June 15 (up to -0.5ºС). Conclusion As a result of summer-season observations, close linear relationships of air temperatures on four mountain high-altitude zones of the Northern Urals (including the mountain tundra zone) with the control temperature data of the meteorological station in Karpinsk town were established. Regression equations are obtained. With the help of the identified relationships, it is possible to retrospectively restore the dynamics of the thermal regime according to the data of a weather station for mountain habitats of different altitudes in the southern part of the Northern Urals over a long period. Among other things, they make it possible to identify the minimum temperatures that act as factors limiting the distribution and survival of plants, determine the species composition and biodiversity of ecosystems. Thus, the long-standing methodological problem of quantitative analysis of the influence of climate dynamics on many population-biological processes, in particular, on the dynamics of the upper mountain treeline ecotone, can be solved to some extent.
×

About the authors

Nikolai V. Tantsyrev

Institute Botanic Garden Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: 89502076608@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1904-4751
Scopus Author ID: 23995967800
ResearcherId: AAW-6195-2021

Candidate of Biological Science, Researcher of Laboratory of Population Biology of Woody Plants and Forest Dynamics

202а, 8 Marta St, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620144

Natalya S. Ivanova

Institute Botanic Garden Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: i.n.s@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0845-9433
Scopus Author ID: 56443439900
ResearcherId: Q-3292-2017

Doctor of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher

202а, 8 Marta St, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620144

Irina V. Petrova

Institute Botanic Garden Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: irina.petrova@botgard.uran.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5689-8452
Scopus Author ID: 55935284300
ResearcherId: N-6695-2018

Doctor of Biological Sciences, Director

202а, 8 Marta St, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620144

References

  1. Pătru-Stupariu I, Hossu CA, Grădinaru SR, Nita A, Stupariu M-S, Huzui-Stoiculescu A, Gavrilidis A-A. A Review of Changes in Mountain Land Use and Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice. Land. 2020;9(9):336. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090336
  2. Gao J, Tang X, Lin S, Bian H. The Influence of Land Use Change on Key Ecosystem Services and Their Relationships in a Mountain Region from Past to Future (1995-2050). Forests. 2021;12(5):616. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12050616
  3. Kohler T, Maselli D. Mountains and Climate Change - From Understanding to Action. Published by Geographica Bernensia with the support of the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC), and an international team of contributors. Bern; 2009. 78 p.
  4. Ivanova NS. Forest typological features of biodiversity and restoration-age dynamics of vegetation of mountain forests of the Southern and Middle Urals (Dissertation of the Doctor of Biological Sciences). Yekaterinburg: Ural State Forestry University; 2019. 304 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Jandl R, Kindermann G, Foldal C, Schüler S, Bouissou C. Early Performance of Tree Species in a Mountain Reforestation Experiment. Forests. 2021;12(2):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020256
  6. Mengist W, Soromessa T, Legese G. Ecosystem services research in mountainous regions: A systematic literature review on current knowledge and research gaps. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;702:134581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134581
  7. Fomin V, Ivanova N, Mikhailovich A. Genetic forest typology as a scientific and methodological basis for environmental studies and forest management. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020;609:012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/609/1/012044
  8. Fomin V, Ivanova N, Mikhailovich A, Zolotova E. Problem of climate-driven dynamics in the genetic forest typology. Modern synthetic methodologies for creating drugs and functional materials (mosm2020): AIP Conference Proceedings. 2021;2388:030007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0068806
  9. Maiti R, Rodriguez HG, Ivanova NS. Autoecology and Ecophysiology of Woody Shrubs and Trees: Concepts and Applications. John Wiley & Sons; 2016. 352 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119104452
  10. Zevallos J, Lavado-Casimiro W. Climate Change Impact on Peruvian Biomes. Forests. 2022;13(2):238. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020238
  11. Ivanova NS, Zolotova ES. Adaptation of Forest Ecosystems to the Humidity Factor in the Middle Urals. Uchenye zapiski kazanskogo universiteta Seriya estestvennye nauki. 2019;161(2):293-306. https://doi.org/10.26907/2542-064X.2019.2.293-306 (In Russ.)
  12. Ivanova NS, Zolotova ES, Li G. Influence of soil moisture regime on the species biomass of the herb layer of pine forests in the Ural Mountains. Ecological Questions. 2021;32(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2021.011
  13. Kellomäki S. Managing Boreal Forests in the Context of Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation and Climate Change Mitigation. CRC Press, 2016, 365 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315166063
  14. Ivanova NS. Interdisciplinary Approach for Sustainable Forest Management. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management. 2018;9(2):257-261. https://doi.org/10.23910/ijbsm/2018.9.2.1859
  15. Shiyatov SG, Mazepa VS. Contemporary expansion of siberian larch into the mountain tundra of the Polar Urals. Russian Journal of Ecology. 2015;46(6):495-502. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1067413615060168 (In Russ.)
  16. Sannikov SN, Tantsyrev NV, Petrova IV. Invasion of Siberian Pine Populations in Mountain Tundra in the Northern Urals. Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2018;11(4):396-405. https://doi.org/10.15372/sej20180406 (In Russ.)
  17. Shiyatov SG. Dendrochronology of the upper forest boundary in the Urals. Moscow: Nauka; 1986. 136 p. (In Russ.)
  18. Hagedorn F, Rigling A, Shiyatov SG, Mazepa VS, Devi NM, Grigor'ev AA, Terent’ev M, Moiseev PA, Bartysh AA, Fomin VV, Kapralov DS, Bugman H. Treeline advances along the Urals Mountain range - driven by improved winter conditions? Global Change Biology. 2014;20(11):3530-3543. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12613
  19. Hagedorn F, Dawes MA, Bubnov MO, Devi NM, Grigoriev AA, Mazepa VS, Shiyatov SG, Moiseev PA, Nagimov ZY. Latitudinal decline in stand biomass and productivity at the elevational treeline in the Ural Mountains despite a common thermal growth limit. Journal of Biogeography. 2020;47(8):1827-1842. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13867
  20. Körner C. Alpine plant life. Functional plant ecology and high mountain ecosystems. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1999, 238 p.

Copyright (c) 2023 Tantsyrev N.V., Ivanova N.S., Petrova I.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies