Self-purification processes of natural water and their laboratory model

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

In this work, the processes of self-purification of natural water masses have been studied, and the possibility of laboratory modeling based on the obtained coefficient of the rate of self-purification of water K from pollutants has been investigated. The correlation between the phenol content and the physical factors of the selected sample was investigated. The calculation of the rate coefficient of self-purification of river water from a contaminant is carried out. The physico-chemical composition of surface waters directly depends on the hydrological regime of the river, which means that the model of self-purification processes can be applied under certain parameters of the studied rivers. On the model obtained during these works, various studies of the correlation of the physico-chemical composition of water from various hydrological parameters can be carried out. The basis of this study was the work of Soviet scientists in the field of mathematical modeling of physico-chemical processes in the natural environment of surface waters.

About the authors

Kirill G. Kondrashin

Astrakhan University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

Author for correspondence.
Email: kirill@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7708-0043

Junior Researcher of the Research Laboratory for Priority Research of the Region, Assistant of the Department of Geodesy, Cadastral Registration

18 Tatishcheva St, Astrakhan, 414056, Russian Federation

References

  1. Aydarov IP. To the problem of ecological regeneration of river basins. Water resources. 2002;29(2):240—252. (In Russ.)
  2. Bazhenova OP. Water quality and saprobity of tributaries of the middle Irtysh and lakes of Omsk. Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2010;1(94):219 (In Russ.)
  3. Nemirovskaya IA. Hydrocarbons in waters and bottom sediments of the White Sea. Problems of the Arctic and Antarctic. 2015;3(105):77—89. (In Russ.)
  4. Korobov VB. Some problems of application of expert methods in practice. Scientific Dialogue. Natural Science. Ecology. Earth Sciences. 2013;3(15):94—108. (In Russ.)
  5. Mokhova ON. On the state of water pollution in the White Sea. Marine biological research: achievements and prospects: collection of materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation, dedicated to the 145th anniversary of the Sevastopol Biological Station. Sevastopol, September 19—23, 2016. Sevastopol: ECOSY-Hydrophysics Publ. 2016. (In Russ.)
  6. Bryzgalo VA. Multiyear and seasonal variability of chemical flow of the White Sea rivers under anthropogenic impact. Ecological Chemistry. 2002;11(2):91—104. (In Russ.)
  7. Quality of sea waters by hydrochemical indicators: yearbook 2015. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 2016. (In Russ.)
  8. Naumova AM. The use of aquatic plants for water and soil treatment of fishery ponds from organic and inorganic pollution. Russian Journal of Veterinary Sanitation, Hygiene and Ecology. 2015;2(14):72—77. (In Russ.)
  9. Guidelines for determining the toxicity of water, bottom sediments, pollutants, and drilling fluids by biotesting. Moscow: REFIA, NIA-Priroda Publ. 2002. (In Russ.)
  10. Dzhenyuk SL. To justification of the integrated monitoring system of the seas of the Western Arctic. Bulletin of the Kola Scientific Center of Russian academy of sciences. 2015;2(21):94—102. (In Russ.)

Copyright (c) 2022 Kondrashin K.G.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies