Aristotle on the relation between logic and ontology


Aristotle was the founder not only logics but also of ontology which he describes in Metaphysics and Categories as a theory of general properties of all entities and categorical aspects they should be analyzed. Meanwhile it is commonly accepted that we inherited from him not one but two different logics: early dialectical logoi of Topics and later formal syllogistic of Prior Analytics. The last considers logics the same way as the modern symbolic logic do. According to J. Bocheński the symbolic logic is “a theory of general objects” (by apt turn in phrase, a "physics of the object in general”) hence logics, as it is interpreted now, has the same subject as ontology. But does Aristotle himself counts that ontology (as it is accepted to speak now) is just a kind of “prolegomenon” to logic? In the paper some aspects of this issue are studied at length.

About the authors

V L Vasyukov

Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

12/1, Goncharnaja St., 109240, Moscow, Russian Federation


  1. Aristotle. The Organon: Posterior Analytics. Topica. Vol. 2. London: William Heinemann ltd.; Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1960. 755 p.
  2. Aristotle. Prior Analytics. The Complete Works of Aristotle. The revised Oxford translation / J. Barnes (ed.), Vol. 1. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1991.
  3. Hintikka J. Analyses of Aristotle. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004. 238 p.
  4. Bochenski JM. Logic and Ontology. Philosophy East and West. 24 (3) (Jul., 1974). P. 275-292.
  5. Wolff Ch. Preliminary discourse on philosophy in general (1728). Indianapolis & New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company Inc., 1963.
  6. Owens J. Is There any Ontology in Aristotle? Dialogue. Canadian Philosophical Review. 1986; 25. P. 697-707.
  7. Leszi W. Aristotle’s Conception of Ontology. Padua, 1975.
  8. Lukasiewicz J. Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957.
  9. Corcoran J. The Founding of Logic: Modern Interpretations of Aristotle’s Logic. Ancient Philosophy. 1994; 14. pp. 9-24.
  10. Russell B. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy (1919). New York: Dover Publications, 1991. 208 p.
  11. van Heijenoort J. Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language. Synthese. 1967; 17. P. 324-330.
  12. Shapiro S. Categories, Structures, and the Frege-Hilbert Controversy: the Status of Meta-Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica. 2005; 13(1). P. 61-77.
  13. Hintikka J. Hilbert Vindicated? Synthese. 1997; 110. P. 15-36.
  14. Peckhaus V. Calculus Ratiocinator vs. Characteristica Universalis? The Two Traditions in Logic, Revisited. History and Philosophy of Logic. 2004; 25(1). P. 3-14.
  15. Corcoran J. The Founding of Logic: Modern Interpretations of Aristotle’s Logic. Ancient Philosophy. 1994; 14. P. 9-24.
  16. Corcoran J. et al. The Contemporary Relevance of Ancient Logical Theory. The Philosophical Quaterly. 1982; 32(126). P. 76-86.
  17. Frege G. Review of E.G. Husserl, Philosophy of Arithmetic I.B. McGuinness (Ed.), Gottlob Frege: Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1994.
  18. Popper KR. The Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1972.
  19. Burnyeat M. A Map of Metaphysics Zeta. Pittsburgh: Mathesis Publications; 2001.
  20. Weigelt Ch. The relation between logic and ontology in the Metaphysics. The Review of Metaphysics. 2007; 60 (issue 3 ). P. 507-542.



Abstract - 2500

PDF (English) - 256




Copyright (c) 2017 Vasyukov V.L.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies