Demonyms in the Pacific Alliance countries: morphological and semantic variation

Cover Page

Abstract


The existing research on onomastics does not sufficiently reflect upon the relation between cultural codes and demonyms, having in mind that demonyms universally represent linguistic devices for expressing territorial and regional identity. The article focuses on the complex polyparadigmal analysis of the system of demonyms related to the macrotoponymy of the four founding countries of the Pacific Alliance: Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. Each of the four founding countries of the Pacific Alliance is characterised by the uniqueness of its culture, historical development, the specifics of the national variant of Spanish that reflects the indigenous influence of substrates and the collective values of the society. The research tasks of the article consist in systemising the morphological devices and the cultural layers of demonyms connected with the administrative division of given countries, detecting the variation parameters, comparing them from the linguacultural point of view. The main material of the research have been 100 official demonyms of Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Peru, and 31 variative denominations. The materials for the research are based on the official websites of the administrative units of the four countries, dictionaries data, diverse types of texts and discourse, as well as the notes of the informants’ speech. The research uses such methods as the continuous sampling method based on Internet sources, the analysis of dictionary definitions, the method of semantic interpretation, the morphological analysis, combined with interviews with informants whose interaction is made possible by the complex polyparadigmal analysis of the material. The authors have determined a series of lexemes that function as demonyms, analysed their form and content from the linguistic point of view. It has been revealed that the main tendency in the formation of suppletive demonyms for macrotoponyms are the terrain features and the assessment of ethnic background or mentality. The analysed demonyms manifest the relations of intralingual, intervariant homonymy, as well as hypo-hyperonymic relations. The complex analysis of the material has provided an opportunity to represent the demonym systems of Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru as multidimensional and at the same time inherent to the unified functional continuum of entity in Spanish-speaking countries. The research results have led to the conclusion that demonyms act as independent notions and generators of new meanings and allusions. It is recommended to use transliteration when translating suppletive demonyms, while their decoding amplifies the linguacultural competence of Spanish-language students and harmonises the intercultural dialogue with the native speakers of Chilean, Colombian, Mexican and Peruvian national variants of Spanish in the areas of education and business.


About the authors

Olga Stanislavovna Chesnokova

Peoples’ Friendhip Uhnversity of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: chesnokova-os@rudn.ru
Moscow, Russia

Ph.D. (Advanced Doctorate) in Philology, Full-time Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages of the Faculty of Philology of the RUDN University. She is a member of the American Name Society. Her research interests include variations of the Spanish language, onomastics, cultural linguistics, intercultural communication, semiotics and literary translation. She has authored over 200 publications in Russian, English and Spanish, including monographs, textbooks, book chapters and numerous journal articles.

Marija Radović

Peoples’ Friendhip Uhnversity of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: radovich-m@pfur.ru
Moscow, Russia

Ph.D., Assistant Lecturer at the Department of Foreign Languages of the Faculty of Philology of the RUDN University. Her research interests include Spanish toponymy, variations of the Spanish and Portuguese languages, cultural linguistics, lexicography, intercultural communication and translation studies.

References

  1. Ахметова М. Катойконимы как объект метаязыковой рефлексии: орфографический аспект // Антропологический форум. 2019. № 40. С. 115-146. [Akhmetova, M. 2019. Katoikonimy kak ob"ekt metayazykovoi refleksii: orfograficheskii aspekt (Demonyms as the Object of Metalinguistic Reflection: Orphographical Aspect), Antropologicheskii forum. 115-146. (In Russ.)]
  2. Дитрих В. Влияние языков американских индейцев на романские языки (II): «общие языки»: ацтекский, кечуа и тупи. Субстрат, адстрат или интерстрат? (пер. с немецкого В.З. Демьянкова) // Вопросы языкознания. 2002. № 2. С. 64-85. [Ditrikh, V. 2002. Vliyanie yazykov amerikanskikh indeitsev na romanskie yazyki (II): «obshchie yazykI»: atstekskii, kechua i tupi. Substrat, adstrat ili interstrat? (per. s nemetskogo V.Z. Dem'yankova) (The influence of American indigenous languages on Romance languages (II) “common languages”: Aztec, Quechua and Tupi. Substrate, adstrate or interstrate? (translated from German by Dem'yankova, V.Z.), Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2, 64-85. (In Russ.)]
  3. Журавлева Н.Ю. Функционирование катойконимов и этнонимов в мексиканском культурном пространстве // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Теория языка. Семиотика. Семантика. 2013. № 4. С. 142-153. [Zhuravleva, N.Yu. 2013. The Functioning of Demonyms and Ethnonyms in Mexican Cultural Space. RUDN University Journal, series “Theory of Language. Semiotics. Semantics” 4. 142-153 (In Russ.)]
  4. Радович М. Los topónimos y gentilicios de Chile y Colombia: su etimología y morfología // Колумбия и Чили: наука, мышление и коммуникация: сборник материалов I Международного междисциплинарного семинара. Москва: ИД «КДУ», «Университетская книга», 2016. С. 54-61. [Radovich, M. 2016. Los topónimos y gentilicios de Chile y Colombia: su etimología y morfología (The Toponyms and Demonyms of Chile and Colombia: Etimology and Morphology), Kolumbiya i Chili: nauka, myshlenie i kommunikatsiya: Sbornik materialov I Mezhdunarodnogo mezhdistsiplinarnogo seminara. 54-61. (In Spanish)]
  5. Степанов Г.В. 1976. Типология языковых состояний и ситуаций в странах романской речи. Москва. [Tipologiya yazykovykh sostoyanii i situatsii v stranakh romanskoi rechi (The Typology of the Linguistic Conditions and Situations in the Romance-speaking Countries). Moscow. (In Russ.)]
  6. Чеснокова О.С. Этнические и региональные реалии Колумбии // Вестник МГОУ. Серия «Лингвистика». 2013. № 4. С. 77-84. [Chesnokova, O.S. 2013. Ehtnicheskie i regional'nye realii Kolumbii (Ethnic and Regional Characteristics of Colombia). Moscow Region State University Journal 4. 77-84. (In Russ.)]
  7. Чеснокова О.С. Испанский язык Мексики: языковая картина мира. М.: ЛЕНАНД, 2020. [Chesnokova, O.S. 2020. Ispanskii yazyk Meksiki: yazykovaya kartina mira (Mexican Spanish: the Linguistic World View). Moscow: LENAND. (In Russ.)]
  8. Ampuero, Roberto. 2012. El último tango de Salvador Allende. Santiago: Sudamericana
  9. Benites, Alfredo & Nathalie Lorrain. 2017. Coopérer avec les Chiliens, les Colombiens, les Mexicains et les Péruviens: L'Alliance du Pacifique. Paris, AFNOR Editions
  10. Bernal, Julio, Alejandro Munévar & Catalina Barajas. 2014. Actitudes lingüísticas en Colombia. Actitudes lingüísticas de los hispanohablantes hacia el idioma español y sus variantes. Chiquito, Ana Beatriz y Quesada Pacheco, Miguel Ángel (eds.) 5, 180-245. Bergen Language and Linguistic Studies (BeLLS). URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.15845/ bells.v5i0.680 (accessed: 12 May 2020)
  11. Bilá, Magdaléna & Svetlana Ivanova. 2020. Language, сulture and ideology in discursive practices. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (2). 219-252. URL: https://doi.org/ 10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-219-252
  12. Bilá, Magdaléna, Alena Kačmárová & Ingrida Vaňková. 2020. The encounter of two cultural identities: The case of social deixis. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (2). 344-365. doi: 10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-344-365
  13. Chávez Fajardo, Soledad & Raïssa Kordic Riquelme. 2019. Acerca del gentilicio: historiografía, remoquetes y estandarización. Literatura y lingüística 39. 275-300. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.29344/0717621x.39.2014 (accessed: 27 May 2020)
  14. Estrada Flórez, Rosa Elvira & José Manuel Pérez Adárraga. 2020. Las creencias y percepciones de los habitantes de Valledupar sobre el término vallenato como gentilicio. Lingüística y Literatura 41 (78). 110-139. URL: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.n78a05 (accessed: 3 June 2020)
  15. Ospina, Andrés. 2016. Bogotálogo (Tercera edición) II. Usos, desusos y abusos del español hablado en Bogotá. Bogotá: Instituto Distrital de Patrimonio Cultural
  16. Ilyin, Dmitry & Elena Sidorova. 2015. Derivational Potential of Toponymical System: Formation and Functioning of Katoikonyms. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics 3 (27). 7-14. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2015.3.1. (accessed: 2 May 2020)
  17. García Padrón, Dolores & Marcial Morera Pérez. 2015. Gentilicios y lexicografía. Onomázein 31. 81-98. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=1345/134544049007 (accessed: 12 March 2020)
  18. Kordic Riquelme, Raïssa & Soledad Chávez Fajardo. 2017. Qué se entiende por gentilicio. Aproximaciones onomasiológicas, sintácticas y morfológicas. Prolegómenos. Boletín de Filología 52 (1). 213-244
  19. Larina, Tatiana. 2015. Culture-specific communicative styles as a framework for interpreting linguistic and cultural idiosyncrasies. International Review of Pragmatics 7 (5). Special issue: Communicative Styles and Genres. 195-215
  20. Larina, Tatiana, Vladimir Ozyumenko & Svetlana Kurteš. 2017. I-identity vs We-identity in language and liscourse: Anglo-Slavonic perspectives. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13 (1). 109-128
  21. Loester, Barbara. 2017. “A Significant Part of an Insignificant Identity”: Tradition, globalisation and the re-articulation of North-East Scots. Russian Journal of Linguistics 21 (2). 335-347
  22. Luna Cabrera & Julio Eduardo. 2005. Su Majestad el Refrán. Manizales
  23. Malyuga, Elena, Alex Krouglov & Barry Tomalin. 2018. Linguo-cultural competence as a cornerstone of translators’ performance in the domain of intercultural business communication. XLinguae 11 (2). 566-582. URL: http://xlinguae.eu/2018_11_02_46.html (accessed: 18 March 2020)
  24. Martinić, Mateo. 2005. De la Trapananda al Aysén: una mirada reflexiva sobre el acontecer de la Región de Aysén desde la Prehistoria hasta nuestros días. Santiago: Pehuén Editores
  25. Moreno de Alba, José Guadalupe. 2001. El español en América. Tercera edición, corregida y aumentada. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica
  26. Morera, Marcial. 2015. El gentilicio en español: aspectos teóricos y prácticos. Madrid: Arco/Libros, S.L
  27. Mugford, Gerrard. 2020. Mexican politeness: an empirical study on the reasons underlying/motivating practices to construct local interpersonal relationships. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (1). 31-55. URL: https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-1-31-55 (accessed: 18 June 2020)
  28. Pinto, Carlos Felipe & Camilla Guimarães Santero Pontes. 2020. La Variación Socioespacial del español actual: el español como lengua franca y la enseñanza del español como lengua extranjera. Intertexto 13 (1). 172-213
  29. Ripoll, Alejandra (ed.) 2018. La Alianza del Pacífico ¿atrapada en el péndulo del regionalismo y del interregionalismo? Bogotá: Opciones Gráficas Editores
  30. Tent, Jan. 2018. What’s in a Demonym? A Note on a New and Uplifting Ethnonym. Names. A Journal of Onomastics 2 (66). 103-105. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00277738.2017. 1415543 (accessed: 11 March 2020)
  31. Vargas López, Sergio Iván. 2018. Vallenato y discurso, una aproximación a partir de sus canciones. Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios. Bogotá, D.C. URL: https://repository.uniminuto.edu/bitstream/handle/10656/6407/T.HUM_VargasLopezSergioIvan_2018.pdf (accessed: 5 April 2020)
  32. Velasco Valdés, Miguel. 1998. Refranero popular mexicano (11 edición). México: Costa-Amic
  33. Словарь персоналий Тихоокеанского Альянса = Diccionario de personalidades de la Alianza del Pacífico / под ред. О.С. Чесноковой. Москва: РУДН, 2020. [Chesnokova, O.S. (ed). 2020. The Dictionary of Illustrious Personalities of the Pacific Alliance. Moscow: RUDN. (In Russ.)]
  34. Словари и энциклопедии на Академике. URL: www.dic.academic.ru (accessed: 5 April 2020)
  35. Поспелов Е.М. 2007. Иллюстрированный атлас мира. География мира: новейший топонимический словарь: ок. 8000 единиц / Е.М. Поспелов. М.: Русские словари: Астрель: АСТ: Хранитель. [Pospelov, E.M. 2007. Illyustrirovannyi atlas mira. Geografiya mira: noveishii toponimicheskii slovar': ok. 8000 edinits (The Illustrated World Atlas. World Geography: the Newest Toponymic Dictionary: around 8,000 units). Moscow: Russkie slovari: Astrel': AST: Khranitel', (In Russ.)]
  36. Breve diccionario de colombianismos. 3ª ed. (2009) Bogotá: Academia Colombiana de la Lengua.
  37. Luna Cabrera, Julio Eduardo. 2002. Diccionario de aztequismos. México: Colofón.
  38. Diccionario de americanismos. 2010. Lima: Santillana.
  39. Diccionario de gentilicios de Colombia. 2008. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia, 2008.176 p.
  40. Diccionario educativo del estudiante. 2009. Bogotá: Larousse.
  41. Diccionario Enciclopédico Vox 1. 2009. Larousse Editorial, S.L., 2009. URL: https://es.thefreedictionary.com/gentilicio (дата обращения: 3 июня 2020)
  42. Montoya, Ramiro. 2006. Diccionario comentado del español actual en Colombia. Bogotá: Ed. Párrafo.
  43. Richard, Renaud. 1997. Diccionario de hispanoamericanismos no recogidos por la Real Academia. 2a ed. Madrid: Cátedra.
  44. Santamaría, Francisco. 2000. Diccionario de mejicanismos. 6a. ed. México: Porrúa.
  45. Diccionario de la Real Academia Española (DRAE). URL: www.dle.rae.es (accessed: 15 April 2020).
  46. Diccionario del Español de México (DEM). URL: http://dem.colmex.mx; El Colegio de México, A.C.
  47. Антиокия, Википедия. URL: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antioquia (accessed: 20 May 2020)
  48. Территориальная организация Чили, Википедия. URL: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Organizaci%C3%B3n_territorial_de_Chile (accessed: 17 May 2020)
  49. “El Magallánico” cumple dos años”. URL: https://elmagallanico.com/2019/08/el-magallanico-cumple-dos-anos-informando-a-la-region (accessed: 29 May 2020)
  50. Magallanes: curiosidades de un pueblo único. URL: https://www.cocacoladechile.cl/historias/ gente-magallanicos-curiosidades-de-un-pueblo-unico (accessed: 26 May 2020)
  51. Агуаскальентес, Википедия. URL: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aguascalientes (accessed: 1 June 2020).
  52. Equipo. URL: https://infoling.org/?lang=es&p=equipo (accessed 28 May 2020).
  53. Jergozo. URL: https://jergozo.com/significado/chilango (accessed 28 May 2020).
  54. Chimpum Callao. URL: http://www.chimpum-callao.com/historia.html (accessed: 25 May 2020).
  55. El Diario, Peru, un país racista contra sí mismo: „Es una forma de „blanquearse““. URL: https://www.eldiario.es/desalambre/Peru-pais-racista-mismo_0_254775486.html (accessed: 2 June 2020)
  56. BBC News, Por qué a muchos peruanos les cuesta reconocerse como cholos. URL: https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-37489332 (accessed: 2 June 2020)

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 503

PDF (Russian) - 159

Cited-By


PlumX

Dimensions


Copyright (c) 2020 Chesnokova O.S., Radović M.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies