Russian students on the potential and limitations of artificial intelligence in education

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The rapid entry of artificial intelligence (hereinafter AI) into all spheres of social life determines the need to consider ongoing changes and to conduct systematic sociological research. Education and science are key resources that, on the one hand, develop and improve AI technologies, but, on the other hand, fully experience the pressure of contradictions caused by new technologies. It is important for both the higher education system and society as a whole to understand how students react to new opportunities and technologies, how involved they are in the use of AI in their educational activities, and how they evaluate their experience of applying new technologies in learning. The article presents data on the Russian university students’ assessment of their personal experience of using generative AI models (neural networks) in educational activities, highlights the most popular AI functions, and evaluates students’ satisfaction with their use. The article is based on the survey of Russian university students conducted in 2023-2024 (N = 52919), which showed that, despite the current massive fascination with digital technologies and the use of neural networks, Russian students assess quite ambiguously their use in studies, and in senior years, this assessment becomes more critical and balanced (concerning the opportunities provided by AI). The survey data allows to conclude that the use of generative AI models in education requires a set of decisions on the direct regulation of its application and ethical issues, the thorough revision of the students’ forms of independent work, including final certifications and test tasks, and a search for constructive approaches to the use of AI to improve the quality of education and the work of the higher education system. Moreover, AI assigns the higher education system a task of developing students’ critical assessment of the results of interaction between a human being and a neural network, focusing on the limitations and capabilities of the generated information, and acceptable formats for its use in research and learning.

About the authors

I. A. Aleshkovski

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: aleshkovski@yandex.ru
Leninskie Gory, 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia

A. T. Gasparishvili

Lomonosov Moscow State University; RUDN University; Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS

Email: gasparishvili@yandex.ru
Leninskie Gory, 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia; Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia; Krzhizhanovskogo St., 24/35-5, Moscow, 117218, Russia

N. P. Narbut

RUDN University; Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS

Email: narbut-np@rudn.ru
Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia; Krzhizhanovskogo St., 24/35-5, Moscow, 117218, Russia

O. V. Krukhmaleva

Lomonosov Moscow State University; RUDN University

Email: kruhoks@yandex.ru
Leninskie Gory, 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia; Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6, Moscow, 117198, Russia

N. E. Savina

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: savina.opinio@yandex.ru
Leninskie Gory, 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia

References

  1. Zakharova I.G., Vorobieva M.S., Boganyuk Yu.V. Soprovozhdenie individualnyh obrazovatelnyh traektoriy na osnove kontseptsii obiyasnimogo iskusstvennogo intellekta [Support of individual educational trajectories based on the concept of explicable artificial intelligence]. Obrazovanie i Nauka. 2022; 24 (1). (In Russ.).
  2. Ivakhnenko E.N., Nikolsky V.S. ChatGPT v vysshem obrazovanii i nauke: ugrozy ili tsenny resurs? [ChatGPT in higher education and science: Threats or a valuable resource?]. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii. 2023; 32 (4). (In Russ.).
  3. Klimova T.A., Kim A.T., Ott M.A. Individualnye obrazovatelnye traektorii studentov kak uslovie kachestvennogo universitetskogo obrazovaniya [Students’ individual educational trajectories as a condition for the high-quality university education]. Universitetskoe Upravlenie: Praktika i Analiz. 2023; 27 (1). (In Russ.).
  4. Korolev P.V. Mnenie studentov i prepodavateley ob ispolzovanii iskusstvennogo intellekta (II) v obrazovanii: k chemu nam gotovitsya [Students and teachers’ perception of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education: What we should prepare for]. Derevoobrabotka: Tekhnologii, Oborudovanie, Menedzhment XXI veka. Moscow; 2023. (In Russ.).
  5. Korchak A.E., Khavenson T.E. Ponyatie “kachestvo” v vysshem obrazovanii: ot oflayn- k onlayn-formatu [Concept “quality” in higher education: From offline to online mode]. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii. 2024; 33 (1). (In Russ.).
  6. Lapina M.A., Tokmakova M.E., Demin D.A., Esayan G.A. Osobennosti vnedreniya iskusstvennogo intellekta v obrazovatelny protsess [Features of the introduction of artificial intelligence into the educational process]. Auditorium. 2023; 3. (In Russ.).
  7. Rezaev A.V., Tregubova N.D. ChatGPT i pyat urokov dlya vysshey shkoly v period stanovleniya “iskusstvennoy sotsialnosti” [ChatGPT and five lessons for higher education in the era of “artificial sociality”]. Telescop. 2023; 1. (In Russ.).
  8. Subbotina M.V. Iskusstvenny intellekt i vysshee obrazovanie — vragi ili soyuzniki [Artificial intelligence and higher education — enemies or allies]. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2024; 24 (1). (In Russ.).
  9. Sysoev P.V. Etika i II-plagiat v akademicheskoy srede: ponimanie studentami voprosov soblyudeniya avtorskoy etiki i problemy plagiata v protsesse vzaimodeystviya s generativnym iskusstvennym intellektom [Ethics and AI-plagiarism in the academy: Students’ understanding of the author’s ethics and the problems of plagiarism in the interaction with generative artificial intelligence]. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii. 2024; 33 (2). (In Russ.).
  10. Abbas M., Jam F.A., Khan T.I. Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2024; 21 (10).
  11. Alenezi M. Digital learning and digital institution in higher education. Education Sciences. 2023; 13 (1).
  12. Bhullar P.S., Joshi M., Chugh R. ChatGPT in higher education — a synthesis of the literature and a future research agenda. Education and Information Technologies. 2024; May.
  13. Bahroun Z., Anane C., Ahmed V., Zacca A. Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability. 2023; 15.
  14. Chan C.K.Y., Hu W. Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2023; 20 (43).
  15. Chaudhry I.S., Sarwary S.A.M., El Refae G.A., Chabchoub H. Time to revisit existing student’s performance evaluation approach in higher education sector in a new era of ChatGPT — a case study. Cogent Education. 2023; 10 (1).
  16. Cotton D.R.E., Cotton P.A., Shipway J.R. Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2024; 61 (2).
  17. Crompton H., Burke D. Artificial intelligence and higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2023; 20.
  18. Lund B., Wang T., Mannuru N.R., Nie B., Shimray S., Wang Z. ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence-written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2023; 74 (5).
  19. Luo J. A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: A call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2024; February.
  20. Nguyen A., Hong Y., Dang B., Huang X. Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.202 4.2323593
  21. O’Dea X. Generative AI: Is it a paradigm shift for higher education? Studies in Higher Education. 2024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2332944
  22. Rahman M., Mostafizer M., Yutaka Watanobe. ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13 (9).
  23. Trotsuk I.V. All power to the experts? Contradictions of the information society as both depending on and devaluating expertise. Russian Sociological Review. 2021; 20 (1).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. Рис. 3. Распределение ответов респондентов, имеющих опыт использования ИИ в зависимости от профиля и курса обучения (в % по профилю и курсу)

Download (144KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Aleshkovski I.A., Gasparishvili A.T., Narbut N.P., Krukhmaleva O.V., Savina N.E.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies