Language and Stylistic Features of the Orthodox Media Sermon

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The author presents an analysis of the linguistic and stylistic features of the Orthodox media sermon of the famous priest Dimitry Smirnov, posted on his multimedia blog. Based on the problems of scientific work, the study is based on the works of leading and foreign media linguists and experts in the field of studying the genre of sermon. It is shown that creative work with the lexical and phraseological funds of the literary language through semantic transformations is updated through the emergence of new connotations, semantic neologisms, transformed phraseological units, which as a result leads to the renewal and strengthening of linguistic expression and contributes to the achievement of the linguo-pragmatic goals of the preacher. The genre of the sermon has specific linguistic features: the traditional address to the audience at the beginning of the sermon and its traditional completion, a large number of names of Jesus Christ, the mention of biblical precedent names and toponyms, implicit and explicit citation of the texts of Holy Scripture, etc. When working with preaching media content, two micro-conclusions were found and one general conclusion that sums up the entire sermon, which indicates a clearly built speech strategy that pursues specific linguo-pragmatic goals: to convey to the audience the main gospel meanings associated with Christ’s Resurrection. The well-thought-out speech strategy and tactics of the preacher purposefully focus the audience’s attention on important Christian issues through which the missionary function of the Orthodox media discourse is realized.

About the authors

Alexandra S. Makarova

St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University; Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Author for correspondence.
Email: aleste_63@mail.ru
PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages of Orthodox Faculty, PSTGU and of the Department of Foreign Languages of Higher School of Economics and Business. Plekhanov Russian University of Economics 6, Likhov per., Moscow, Russian Federation, 127051; 36, Stemyanny per., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117997

References

  1. Issers, O.S. (1999). Communication strategies and tactics of Russian speech [dissertation]. Omsk. 1999. URL: https://cheloveknauka.com/kommunikativnye-strategii-i-taktiki-russkoyrechi (accessed: 20.07.2022). (In Russ.).
  2. Generalova, E.V. (2021). Media text as a reflection of dynamic chronological changes in vocabulary and phraseology. Media Linguistics, 8(2), 180–192. (In Russ.).
  3. Makarova, A.S. (2022). Semantics and pragmatics of linguistic units of orthodox media HOSPITAL. In: Slovo, vyskazyvanie, tekst v kognitivnom, pragmaticheskom i kul’turologicheskom aspektah, L.A. Nefedova (Ed.). Chelyabinsk. pp. 236–239. (In Russ.).
  4. Makarova, A.S. (2021). Role of the visual component in orthodox media discourse. Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo federal’nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Filologicheskie nauki, 7(73), 1, 108–117. (In Russ.).
  5. Alefirenko, N.F. (2016). Media discourse and its communicative-pragmatic entity. Media Linguistics, 1(11), 49–57. (In Russ.).
  6. Dobrosklonskaya, T.G. (2014). Mass media discourse as an object of scientific description. Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Humanities Sciences, 13(184), 22, 181–187. (In Russ.).
  7. Gajda, S. (2010). Nowe media w perspektywie lingwistycznej. In: Styl — dyskurs — media, B. Bogołębska, M. Worsowicz (eds.). Łódź. (In Polish).
  8. Van Dijk T.A. (2013). Political discourse and ideology. Ethnolinguistics, 15.
  9. Ickovich, T.V. (2017). Axiological aspects of modern linguistic research. In: Tezisy dokladov Vtorogo mezhdunarodnogo nauchnogo seminara, Yu.N. Mihajlova (Ed.). Ekaterinburg: Azhur publ. pp. 19–21. (In Russ.).
  10. Malafeev, A.Yu. (2013). A modern Orthodox sermon and a public lecture: lexis and pragmatics. Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 5(26), 37–42. (In Russ.).
  11. Petrushko, I.V. (2018). An Integrative Model of the Communicative Event of the Orthodox Sermon [dissertation]. Tver’. (In Russ.).
  12. Prohvatilova, O.A. (2019). Axiological potential of modern Orthodox missionary preaching. In: Aksiologicheskie aspekty sovremennyh filologicheskih issledovanij: tezisy dokladov. Ekaterinburg: Azhur publ. pp. 47–48. (In Russ.).
  13. Multimedia blog of Dimitri Smirnov. URL: http://www.dimitrysmirnov.ru/blog/ propoved-105611/ (accessed: 10.04.2022). (In Russ.).
  14. Makarova, A.S. (2020). Features of Ironic Content in the Orthodox Media Discourse. Izvestia of Smolensk State University, 4(52), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.35785/2072-9464-2020-52-486-101 (In Russ.).
  15. Azbuka very = ABC of Faith. URL: https://azbyka.ru/carstvo-bozhie-nebesnoe (accessed: 16.06.2022). (In Russ.).
  16. Bible dictionary. URL: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Spravochniki/biblejskij-slovar-gese/662 (accessed: 26.08.2022). (In Russ.).
  17. Phraseological dictionary of the Russian literary language (1997). A.I. Fyodorov (Ed.). Moscow: Citadel’. (In Russ.).
  18. Nahimova, E.A. (2007). Precedent Names in Mass Communication [monograph.]. Ekaterinburg. (In Russ.).
  19. Russian Dictionary: in 4 vols. (1981–1984). A.P. Evgen’eva (Ed.). Moscow. (In Russ.).
  20. Gospel of John, Luke, Matthew. URL: http://bible.optina.ru/ (accessed 23.04.2022). (In Russ.).
  21. Mokienko, V.M., Nikitina, T.G. & Nikolaeva, E.K. (2010). Big dictionary of Russian proverbs. Moscow: OLMA Media. (In Russ.).
  22. Novikov, L.A. (1973). Antonymy in Russian (semantic analysis of opposites in lexis). Moscow. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

There are no supplementary files to display.


Copyright (c) 2022 Makarova A.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies