Addressing local government issues in the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation during the implementation of municipal reform in Russia
- Authors: Amiantov A.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
- Issue: Vol 6, No 2 (2019)
- Pages: 133-147
- Section: FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT IN RUSSIA
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/public-administration/article/view/23020
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2019-6-2-133-147
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The presented study is devoted to the study of the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in relation to issues of local self-government in the context of the municipal reform of 2014-2015. and its legal consequences. The aim of this work is to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the identified problems of the work of local authorities in the period following the start of municipal reform. The research methodology is built by combining descriptive analysis elements and a case study. It is concluded that the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation has consistently maintained its position on the constitutional nature of the reform of local authorities. The provisions of the relevant regulatory legal acts are limited only partially and only in relation to first-level municipalities - municipal authorities of settlements. Given the deprivation of the latter a significant part of the powers and the observed transition to a singlelevel system of local self-government, the adoption of these restrictions does not significantly affect the implementation of the reform. Of fundamental importance is the position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation regarding the new powers of regional authorities in relation to municipalities. The increase in the arsenal of legal instruments of the influence of the leadership of the constituent entities of the federation on the heads of local self-government was not interpreted as a violation of the constitutional principle of the independence of municipalities. The latter opens up the possibility for further legalization of the process of embedding municipal bodies in the structure of the informal “power vertical”.
About the authors
Aleksey Andreevich Amiantov
Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: perviyzam@mail.ru
PhD in political science, Assistant professor of the department of Public administration
References
- Babichev I.V. Aktual’nye trendy munitsipal’noi reformy // Mestnoe samoupravlenie v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: voprosy zakonodatel’nogo obespecheniya i pravoprimenitel’naya praktika. Moscow, 2016.
- Bobrova N.A. Itogi munitsipal’noi reformy – 2014 // Munitsipal’naya sluzhba: pravovye voprosy. 2018. No. 1. Pp. 27–31.
- Bykova A.G. K voprosu o sposobakh zameshcheniya dolzhnosti glavy munitsipal’nogo obrazovaniya // Vestnik Omskoi yuridicheskoi akademii. 2016. No. 2(31).
- Viskulova V.V. Zakonomernosti v razvitii rossiiskikh institutov neposredstvennoi demokratii i otkloneniya ot nikh // Konstitutsionnaya teoriya i praktika publichnoi vlasti: zakonomernosti i otkloneniya. Moscow, 2015. Pp. 91–92.
- Gritsenko E.V. Munitsipal’naya reforma v fokuse reshenii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossii: novoe v material’no-pravovykh i protsessual’nykh podkhodakh // Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2016. No. 5(114). Pp. 43–71.
- Ezhukova O.A. Problemy razvitiya gorodskikh okrugov v svete noveishikh reform munitsipal’nogo zakonodatel’stva: po materialam «kruglogo stola» // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo. 2015. No. 1. Pp. 45–52.
- Eremin A.V. Prava na mestnoe samoupravlenie v kontekste deyatel’nosti konstitutsionnogo suda Rossii // Kriminalist. 2019. No. 2(27). Pp. 55–59.
- Kim Yu.V. Sistemnye effekty nesistemnykh reshenii: o tendentsiyakh razvitiya sistemy mestnogo samoupravleniya v sovremennoi Rossii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo. 2015. No. 5. Pp. 67–73.
- Korosteleva M.V. Problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya izbraniya glavy munitsipal’nogo obrazovaniya // Munitsipal’naya sluzhba: pravovye voprosy. 2016. No. 3.
- Kostyukov A.N. Kontrreforma mestnogo samoupravleniya kak gosudarstvennaya politika unizheniya gorodskikh okrugov // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 61–64.
- Kostyukov A.N., Blagov Yu.V. Konstitutsionnost’ munitsipal’noi reformy // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo. 2016. No. 6. Pp. 62–65.
- Municipal’naja reforma v Podmoskov’e i federal’nyj centr: prichiny muni-cipal’noj reformy glazami storon konflikta. URL: http://2017.vybor-naroda.org/stovyborah/97218municipalnaya-reforma-v-moskovskoy-oblasti-za-i-protiv.html (data obrashhenija: 28.08.2019).
- O nekotorykh pravovykh pozitsiyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii v sfere organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya. URL: https://to59.minjust.ru/ru/node/238630 (data obrashcheniya: 28.08.2019).
- Obzor reshenii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii za 1–3 kvartaly 2015 goda po voprosam organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya. URL: http://131fz.ranepa.ru/uploads/files/2016/11/mp/2015/4/konst.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 28.08.2019).
- Obzor sudebnoi praktiki o mestnom samoupravlenii resheniya federal’nykh sudov, konstitutsionnykh i ustavnykh sudov sub”ektov RF. 15 fevralya 2016 goda. URL: https:// mvp.government-nnov.ru/?id=68632 (data obrashcheniya: 28.08.2019).
- Obzor sudebnoi praktiki o mestnom samoupravlenii. 30 yanvarya 2018 goda. URL: http://old.niu.ranepa.ru/fpk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/OSP_OMSU_03.2018.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 28.08.201).
- Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 16.01.2018 N 12-O “Po zaprosu gubernatora Zabaikal’skogo kraya o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii chastei 1 i 2 stat’i 74 Federal’nogo zakona ‘Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii’”. URL: https://legalacts.ru/sud/opredelenie-konstitutsionnogosuda-rf-ot-17072018-n-1714-o-r/ (data obrashcheniya: 28.08.2019).
- Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 17.07.2018 № 1714-O-R ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu khodataistva gubernatora Zabaikal’skogo kraya o raz”yasnenii Opredeleniya Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 16 yanvarya 2018 goda № 12-O. URL: https://legalacts.ru/sud/opredelenie-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rf-ot-17072018-n-1714-o-r/ (data obrashcheniya: 28.08.2019).
- Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 03.07.2018 № 1676-O ob otkaze v prinyatii k rassmotreniyu zhaloby grazhdanina Kryzhova Sergeya Borisovicha na narushenie ego konstitutsionnykh prav abzatsami pervym i sed’mym chasti 2.1 stat’i 36 Federal’nogo zakona “Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii”. URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71892356/ (data obrashcheniya: 28.08.2019).
- Provotorov R.A. Vybory glavy munitsipal’nogo obrazovaniya v kontekste munitsipal’noi reformy // Zakon i Pravo. 2018. No. 9. Pp. 44–47.
- Federal’nyi zakon ot 27 maya 2014 g. N 136-FZ “O vnesenii izmenenii v stat’yu.3 Federal’nogo zakona ‘Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel’nykh (predstavitel’nykh) i ispolnitel’nykh organov gosudarstvennoi vlasti sub”ektov Rossi- iskoi Federatsii’” i Federal’nyi zakon “Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii” (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami). URL: https://base.garant.ru/70662192/ (data obrashcheniya: 28.08.2019).
- Federal’nyi zakon ot 3 fevralya 2015 g. N 8-FZ “O vnesenii izmenenii v stat’i 32 i 33 Federal’nogo zakona ‘Ob osnovnykh garantiyakh izbiratel’nykh prav i prava na uchastie v referendume grazhdan Rossiiskoi Federatsii’” i Federal’nyi zakon “Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii”. URL: https:// base.garant.ru/70858528/(data obrashcheniya: 28.08.2019).
- Chikhladze L.T. Novye tendentsii formirovaniya organov mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Yuridicheskaya nauka. 2017. No. 1. Pp. 42–51.
- Yashchuk T.V. Evolyutsiya mestnogo upravleniya i samoupravleniya v Rossii // Pravoprimenenie. 2017. No. 1. Pp. 92–100.