Features of Formation of National Innovation Systems in Different Countries

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article examines the factors and features of the formation of the national innovation system (NIS). The subject of the study is the specifics of the national innovation system in different countries. The absence of a universal effective NIS model that is universal for all countries indicates the significance of this study. The result of the study is to identify the features of the formation of NIS for a number of countries (clusters), and recommendations for building an effective NIS in Russia. The article applies the methods of correlation and regression analysis of innovative indicators for countries for which data are available in the public domain were used. Evaluation and verification of the adequacy of the applied model is determined by numerical analysis of the data obtained, as well as by economic interpretation. Correlation and regression analysis are performed separately for countries from different clusters in order to identify features between them. The study revealed the links between the type of government, state involvement and high-tech production (innovation).

About the authors

Rozdon J. Mukhitdinov

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: rmuhitdinov@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2987-695X

Postgraduate Student at the School of Politics and Governance

20, Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 101000

References

  1. Shumpeter J. Teorija jekonomicheskogo razvitija [Theory of Economic Development]. Moscow: Progress; 1982. 132 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Edquist С. Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006: 181–208.
  3. Jankowska B., Matysek-Jędrych A., Mroczek-Dąbrowska K. Efficiency of National Innovation Systems: Poland and Bulgaria in the Context of the Global Innovation Index. Comparative Economic Research. 2017: 77–94.
  4. Xielin L. National Innovation Systems in Developing Countries: The Chinese National Innovation System in Transition. Handbook of Innovation System and Developing Countries. Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2009: 119–139.
  5. Fagerberg J., Srholec M. National Innovation Systems, Capabilities and Economic Development. Research Policy. 2008; 37(9): 1417–1435. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733308001431?via%3Dihub (accessed: 12.02.2022).
  6. Sorin K.M. Science, Technology, and Innovation for Economic Competitiveness: The Role of Smart Specialization in Less-developed Countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017;123:95–107.
  7. Bruno S.S., et al. Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: The Experience of Developed and Developing Countries. Entrepreneurship and Development in the 21st Century. Bingley: Emerald publishing limited; 2019: 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-233-720191002
  8. Xue W., Wang Z., Jiang Z. Configurational Differences of National Innovation Capability: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2020: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1832211
  9. Masoud A., Ghazinoory S., Nasri S. Measuring the Efficiency, Effectiveness and Changeability of Institutions for Improving National Innovation System. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. 2020: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2020.1797517
  10. Frans H., Klerkx L., Roep D. Structural Conditions for Collaboration and Learning in Innovation Networks: Using an Innovation System Performance Lens to Analyse Agricultural Knowledge Systems. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 2015; 21(1): 35–54.
  11. Xavier C., Maloney W.F. The Innovation Paradox: Developing-country Capabilities and the Unrealized Promise of Technological Catch-up. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2017. 186 p.
  12. Franz T., Trippl M. Regional Innovation Policies for New Path Development–beyond Neoliberal and Traditional Systemic Views. European Planning Studies. 2018; 26(9): 1779–1795.
  13. Savenkovs K. The Model of National Innovation System for latvia in the Context of European Countries Experience. Actual Problems in Economics. 2017;189:34.
  14. Wen-Min L., Kweh Q.L., Huang Ch. Intellectual Capital and National Innovation Systems Performance. Knowledge-based Systems. 2014;71:201–210.
  15. Uta W., Montalvo C. Knowledge Transfer Dynamics and Innovation: Behaviour, Interactions and Aggregated Outcomes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 171: S56–S68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.198
  16. Ben M.R., Johnston R. Technology Foresight for Wiring up the National Innovation System: Experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2010; 60(1): 37–54.
  17. Fagerberg J., Lundvall B., Srholec M. Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development. The European Journal of Development Research. 2018; 30(3): 533–556.
  18. Öner T., Lazonick W. Financialized Corporations in a National Innovation System: The US Pharmaceutical Industry. International Journal of Political Economy. 2018; 47(3-4): 281–316.
  19. Bis’ko K.T. Institucional’nye Faktory Formirovanija Nacional’noj Innovacionnoj Sistemy Rossii. [Institutional Factors of Formation of National Innovative System of Russia]. Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta upravlenija i jekonomiki. 2015; 4(52): 103–108 (In Russ.).
  20. Rao-Nicholson R., Tim V., and Zaheer K. Social Innovation in Emerging Economies: A National Systems of Innovation Based Approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017;121:228–237.
  21. Cheung T.M. How China’s Defense Innovation System Is Advancing the Country’s Military Technological Rise. SITC Research Briefs. Series 10. Berkeley: University of California; 2018: 1–5.
  22. Zhuparova A, Rimma S., Zhaisanova D. Using the Case Study Method in Studying the National Innovation System: Cross-Country Comparative Analysis. European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Academic Conferences International Limited; 2018.
  23. Malerba F., McKelvey M. Knowledge-intensive Innovative Entrepreneurship Integrating Schumpeter, Evolutionary Economics, and Innovation Systems. Small Business Economics. 2020; 54(2): 503–522.
  24. Ansell C., Gash A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008; 18(4); 543–571.
  25. Kang D., et al. Comparing National Innovation System Among the USA, Japan, and Finland to Improve Korean Deliberation Organization for National Science and Technology Policy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2019; 5(4): 82.

Copyright (c) 2022 Mukhitdinov R.J.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies