RUDN Journal of Public AdministrationRUDN Journal of Public AdministrationВестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Государственное и муниципальное управление2312-83132411-1228Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)3312710.22363/2312-8313-2022-9-4-401-417Current Problems of Public AdministrationАктуальные проблемы государственного управленияResearch ArticleFeatures of Formation of National Innovation Systems in Different CountriesСтрановые особенности формирования национальной инновационной системыhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2987-695XMukhitdinovRozdon J.МухитдиновРоздон Джамшедович

Postgraduate Student at the School of Politics and Governance

аспирант департамента политики и управления

rmuhitdinov@hse.ruHSE UniversityНациональный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»3012202294VOL 9, NO4 (2022)ТОМ 9, №4 (2022)40141730122022Copyright ©; 2022, Mukhitdinov R.J.Copyright ©; 2022, Мухитдинов Р.Д.2022Mukhitdinov R.J.Мухитдинов Р.Д.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0https://journals.rudn.ru/public-administration/article/view/33127

The article examines the factors and features of the formation of the national innovation system (NIS). The subject of the study is the specifics of the national innovation system in different countries. The absence of a universal effective NIS model that is universal for all countries indicates the significance of this study. The result of the study is to identify the features of the formation of NIS for a number of countries (clusters), and recommendations for building an effective NIS in Russia. The article applies the methods of correlation and regression analysis of innovative indicators for countries for which data are available in the public domain were used. Evaluation and verification of the adequacy of the applied model is determined by numerical analysis of the data obtained, as well as by economic interpretation. Correlation and regression analysis are performed separately for countries from different clusters in order to identify features between them. The study revealed the links between the type of government, state involvement and high-tech production (innovation).

Статья посвящена выявлению факторов и особенностей формирования национальной инновационной системы (НИС). Предметом исследования являются особенности национальной инновационной системы в различных странах. Отсутствие универсальной для всех стран модели эффективной НИС указывает на значимость данного исследования. Результатом исследования является выявление особенностей формирования НИС для ряда стран (кластеров), а также даны рекомендации по совершенствованию НИС с учетом данных особенностей. Для проведения исследования были использованы методы корреляционно-регрессионного анализа инновационных показателей по странам, данные по которым имеются в открытом доступе. Оценка и проверка адекватности применяемой модели определяется числового анализа полученных данных, а также путем экономической интерпретации. Корреляционно-регрессионный анализ производится отдельно для стран из разных кластеров, для того чтобы выявить особенности между ними. В качестве результата исследования выявлены связи между типом государственного правления, государственного вовлечения и высокотехнологичным производством (инновациями).

features of the national innovation systemthe role of the state in the NIScluster analysisthe formation of an effective NISособенности национальной инновационной системыроль государства в НИСкластерный анализ инновационности странформирование эффективной НИСShumpeter J. Teorija jekonomicheskogo razvitija [Theory of Economic Development]. Moscow: Progress; 1982. 132 p. (In Russ.).Шумпетер Й. Теория экономического развития. М.: Прогресс, 1982. 132 c.Edquist С. Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006: 181–208.Edquist С. Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges / Nelson R.R.t Mowery D.C., Fagerberg J. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2006. P. 181-208.Jankowska B., Matysek-Jędrych A., Mroczek-Dąbrowska K. Efficiency of National Innovation Systems: Poland and Bulgaria in the Context of the Global Innovation Index. Comparative Economic Research. 2017: 77–94.Jankowska B., Matysek-Jędrych A., Mroczek-Dąbrowska K. Efficiency of National Innovation Systems: Poland and Bulgaria in the Context of the Global Innovation Index // Comparative Economic Research. 2017. P. 77-94.Xielin L. National Innovation Systems in Developing Countries: The Chinese National Innovation System in Transition. Handbook of Innovation System and Developing Countries. Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2009: 119–139.Xielin L. National Innovation Systems in Developing Countries: the Chinese National Innovation System in Transition // Handbook of Innovation System and Developing Countries. Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting. 2009. P 119-139.Fagerberg J., Srholec M. National Innovation Systems, Capabilities and Economic Development. Research Policy. 2008; 37(9): 1417–1435. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733308001431?via%3Dihub (accessed: 12.02.2022).Fagerberg J., Srholec M. National Innovation Systems, Capabilities and Economic Development // Research Policy. 2008. 37(9). P. 1417-1435. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048733308001431?via%3Dihub (дата обращения: 12.02.2022).Sorin K.M. Science, Technology, and Innovation for Economic Competitiveness: The Role of Smart Specialization in Less-developed Countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017;123:95–107.Sorin K.M. Science, Technology, and Innovation for Economic Competitiveness: The Role of Smart Specialization in Less-developed Countries // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. 123. P. 95-107.Bruno S.S., et al. Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: The Experience of Developed and Developing Countries. Entrepreneurship and Development in the 21st Century. Bingley: Emerald publishing limited; 2019: 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-233-720191002Bruno S.S., et al. Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: The Experience of Developed and Developing Countries // Entrepreneurship and Development in the 21st Century. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2019. P. 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-233-720191002Xue W., Wang Z., Jiang Z. Configurational Differences of National Innovation Capability: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2020: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1832211Xue W., Wang Z., Jiang Z. Configurational Differences of National Innovation Capability: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach // Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2020. P. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1832211Masoud A., Ghazinoory S., Nasri S. Measuring the Efficiency, Effectiveness and Changeability of Institutions for Improving National Innovation System. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. 2020: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2020.1797517Masoud A., Ghazinoory S., Nasri S. Measuring the Efficiency, Effectiveness and Changeability of Institutions for Improving National Innovation System // Asian Journal of Technology Innovation. 2020. P. 1-25. URL: 10.1080/19761597.2020.1797517Frans H., Klerkx L., Roep D. Structural Conditions for Collaboration and Learning in Innovation Networks: Using an Innovation System Performance Lens to Analyse Agricultural Knowledge Systems. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 2015; 21(1): 35–54.Frans H., Klerkx L., Roep D. Structural Conditions for Collaboration and Learning in Innovation Networks: Using an Innovation System Performance Lens to Analyse Agricultural Knowledge Systems // The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 2015. 21(1). P. 35-54.Xavier C., Maloney W.F. The Innovation Paradox: Developing-country Capabilities and the Unrealized Promise of Technological Catch-up. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2017. 186 p.Xavier C., Maloney W.F. The Innovation Paradox: Developing-country Capabilities and the Unrealized Promise of Technological Catch-up. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2017. 186 p.Franz T., Trippl M. Regional Innovation Policies for New Path Development–beyond Neoliberal and Traditional Systemic Views. European Planning Studies. 2018; 26(9): 1779–1795.Franz T., Trippl M. Regional Innovation Policies for New Path Development-beyond Neo-liberal and Traditional Systemic Views // European Planning Studies. 2018. 26(9). P. 1779-1795.Savenkovs K. The Model of National Innovation System for latvia in the Context of European Countries Experience. Actual Problems in Economics. 2017;189:34.Savenkovs K. The Model of National Innovation System for Latvia in the Context of European Countries Experience // Actual Problems in Economics. 2017. 189. P. 34.Wen-Min L., Kweh Q.L., Huang Ch. Intellectual Capital and National Innovation Systems Performance. Knowledge-based Systems. 2014;71:201–210.Wen-Min L., Kweh Q.L., Huang Ch. Intellectual Capital and National Innovation Systems Performance // Knowledge-based Systems. 2014. 71. P. 201-210.Uta W., Montalvo C. Knowledge Transfer Dynamics and Innovation: Behaviour, Interactions and Aggregated Outcomes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 171: S56–S68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.198Uta W., Montalvo C. Knowledge Transfer Dynamics and Innovation: Behaviour, Interactions and Aggregated Outcomes // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. 171. P. S56-S68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.198Ben M.R., Johnston R. Technology Foresight for Wiring up the National Innovation System: Experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2010; 60(1): 37–54.Ben M.R., Johnston R. Technology Foresight for Wiring up the National Innovation System: Experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2010. 60(1). P. 37-54.Fagerberg J., Lundvall B., Srholec M. Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development. The European Journal of Development Research. 2018; 30(3): 533–556.Fagerberg J., Lundvall B., Srholec M. Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development // The European Journal of Development Research. 2018. 30(3) P. 533-556.Öner T., Lazonick W. Financialized Corporations in a National Innovation System: The US Pharmaceutical Industry. International Journal of Political Economy. 2018; 47(3-4): 281–316.Öner T., Lazonick W. Financialized Corporations in a National Innovation System: The US Pharmaceutical Industry // International Journal of Political Economy. 2018. 47(3-4). P. 281-316.Bis’ko K.T. Institucional’nye Faktory Formirovanija Nacional’noj Innovacionnoj Sistemy Rossii. [Institutional Factors of Formation of National Innovative System of Russia]. Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta upravlenija i jekonomiki. 2015; 4(52): 103–108 (In Russ.).Бисько К.Т. Институциональные факторы формирования национальной инновационной системы России // Ученые записки Санкт-Петербургского университета управления и экономики. 2015. 4(52). C. 103-108.Rao-Nicholson R., Tim V., and Zaheer K. Social Innovation in Emerging Economies: A National Systems of Innovation Based Approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017;121:228–237.Rao-Nicholson R., Tim V., and Zaheer K. Social Innovation in Emerging Economies: A National Systems of Innovation Based Approach // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. 121. P. 228-237.Cheung T.M. How China’s Defense Innovation System Is Advancing the Country’s Military Technological Rise. SITC Research Briefs. Series 10. Berkeley: University of California; 2018: 1–5.Cheung T.M. How China’s Defense Innovation System Is Advancing the Country’s Military Technological Rise // SITC Research Briefs. Series 10. Berkeley: University of California, 2018. P. 1-5Zhuparova A, Rimma S., Zhaisanova D. Using the Case Study Method in Studying the National Innovation System: Cross-Country Comparative Analysis. European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Academic Conferences International Limited; 2018.Zhuparova A, Rimma S., Zhaisanova D. Using the Case Study Method in Studying the National Innovation System: Cross-Country Comparative Analysis // European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Academic Conferences International Limited, 2018.Malerba F., McKelvey M. Knowledge-intensive Innovative Entrepreneurship Integrating Schumpeter, Evolutionary Economics, and Innovation Systems. Small Business Economics. 2020; 54(2): 503–522.Malerba F., McKelvey M. Knowledge-intensive Innovative Entrepreneurship Integrating Schumpeter, Evolutionary economics, and Innovation Systems // Small Business Economics. 2020. 54(2). P. 503-522.Ansell C., Gash A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008; 18(4); 543–571.Ansell C., Gash A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008. 18(4) P. 543-571.Kang D., et al. Comparing National Innovation System Among the USA, Japan, and Finland to Improve Korean Deliberation Organization for National Science and Technology Policy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2019; 5(4): 82.Kang D., et al. Comparing National Innovation System Among the USA, Japan, and Finland to Improve Korean Deliberation Organization for National Science and Technology Policy // Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2019. 5(4). P. 82.