The Patriotic Education Policy Within the Framework of Belarus and Russia Union State: The Potential for Institutionalization
- Authors: Bakhlova O.V.1, Bakhlov I.V.1, Uliaskina E.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
- Issue: Vol 25, No 4 (2023): New Reversals in the Theory and Methodology of Political Science
- Pages: 940-952
- Section: THE POLICY ANALISYS
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/view/37392
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-4-940-952
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UGROOQ
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Patriotic issues have been becoming now the focus of socio-political discussions and management practices. Multilayered challenges and determinants of world political development actualize the interrelation of internal and external tasks corresponding to ensuring national security, identity formation and achieving national consolidation. Patriotic education is gaining fundamental importance as one of the main directions on this path. Its constitution as an autonomous sphere of state policy implies the need to improve the previously established mechanisms and regulatory framework. Additional opportunities and tools are also available in the sphere of integration cooperation between the Russian Federation and its closest ally, the Republic of Belarus. The basis is a set of pro-integration factors that stimulate the humanitarian dimension. The institutionalization of the patriotic education policy is considered as a dynamic process of formalization and ordering of the corresponding expectations and intentions, clothed in the norms of national law and integration institutions. The normative and organizational elements characterizing its state and potential within the Union State are analyzed. The incompleteness of legislative institutionalization in the domestic dimension and the absence of specific integration regulations in this area are emphasized, which follows, among other things, from the institutional design peculiarities of the participating countries and the amorphous model of Russian - Belarusian integration, which does not have clear conceptual parameters and methodological foundations. The creation of a union system of patriotic education largely depends on the improvement of the overall integration system, including by deepening its institutionalization and the introduction of integration law.
About the authors
Olga V. Bakhlova
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: olga.bahlova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3849-8321
Doctor of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of General History, Political Science and Area Studies Saransk, Russian Federation
Igor V. Bakhlov
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Email: bahlov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6886-5762
Doctor of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of General History, Political Science and Area Studies
Saransk, Russian FederationEkaterina G. Uliaskina
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Email: katerina.ulyashkina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4670-003X
PhD in Political Sciences, Analyst of the Department of General History, Political Science and Area Studies
Saransk, Russian FederationReferences
- Arah, M. (1998). The European Union: a vision of political unification. Moscow: Ekonomika; Arah Consulting, Rosinvest. (In Russian).
- Baekken, H. (2021). Patriotic disunity: limits to popular support for militaristic policy in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 37(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2021.1905417
- Deutsch, K.W. (2015). Political community and the North American area. Princeton: University Press Princeton.
- Etzioni, A. (2001). Political unification revisited: On building supernational communities, Lanham: Lexington Books.
- Evstafiev, D.G. & Tsyganova, L.A. (2023). After post-modernity: Discussion points against the background of global transformations. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 25(2), 293–307. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-2-293-307
- Girinsky, A.A. (2023). On “conservative balance” and “traditional values”. Russia in Global Affairs, 21(3), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2023-21-3-24-37
- Haas, E. (1964). Technocracy, pluralism and new Europe. In A New Europe? (pp. 66–88). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
- Hysing, E., & Olsson, J. (2018). New political constitutionalism. In Green inside activism for sustainable development: Political agency and institutional change (pp. 23–45). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56723-5_2
- Leshenyuk, O.N. (2023). Impact of unilateral coercive measures on implementation of the 2030 agenda in the Republic of Belarus. Journal of International Analytics, 14(1), 111–122. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-1-111-122
- Lishuang, G. (2023). Rethinking and reviving: The modern fate of traditional Russian values. Voprosy filosofii, (3), 58–69. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-3-58-69 March, J., & Olsen, J.P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. The American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840
- Mukhaeva, M.S. (2023). Foreign policy venues of the Republic of Belarus amid confrontation with western states: Role of the Union State and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Governance and Politics, 2(1), 33–50. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/2782- 7062-2023-2-1-33-50
- Parsons, T. (1990). Prolegomena to a theory of social institutions. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095758
- Romanova, T.A., & Mazanik, S.V. (2022). Coordinative discourse of strategic sovereignty tilting the European Union’s institutional balance. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 15(5), 79–112. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-5-86-79-112
- Soldatos, P. (1989). Le système institutionnel et politique des communautés européennes dans un monde en mutation: Théorie et pratique. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
- Stoppe, A.G. (2022). Youth policy in the Union State: Youth — its present and future. The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology, (3), 229–232 (In Russian).
- Uzgorok, M.Ju. (2021). The main factors in the formation of citizenship and patriotism in modern conditions. Proceedings of BSTU. Issue 6: History, Philosophy, 2(251), 90–93. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.52065/2520-6885-2021-251-2-90-93
- Volkov, Yu.G., & Vagina, V.O. (2022). Dominant forms of patriotic practices of youth in the South of Russia (based on sociological surveys). Sociology, (3), 109–115. (In Russian).
- Zvezdkin, N.M. (2021). Trends and prospects of patriotic upbringing system development in the Republic of Belarus: a sociological analysis. Vesnіk Grodzenskaga dzjarzhaўnaga ўnіversіtjeta іmja Jankі Kupaly. Seryja 5. Jekanomіka. Sacyjalogіja. Bіjalogіja, 11(2), 92–100. (In Russian).