Political Theology of Contingency: Reading Materialists with Carl Schmitt
- Authors: Rebrov S.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 25, No 2 (2023): Political Science in Search of New Approaches
- Pages: 308-318
- Section: IN SEARCH OF THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF THE POLITICAL
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/view/35152
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-2-308-318
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VYONIK
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Political theology is one of the most problematic spheres in modern political theory. The clash of positions between supporters of individual interpretations of this discipline, on the one hand, is a serious problem, however, in this sense, the absence of strict definitions opens an opportunity for the most unusual forms of interaction between politics and religion. Even in the case when religion acts exclusively as an analogy of any other worldview position. The study relies on a comparative historical analysis of various definitions of political theology; the method of philosophical deconstruction is used for a general description of the possible combination of the principles of political theology and materialism. This research considers the possibilities of a conceptual combination of the principles of political theology and materialistic philosophy, the foundations of which in both cases are the concept of the specific angle, which at the worldview level can acquire a characteristic of God as a political founder.
Keywords
About the authors
Sergey A. Rebrov
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: naruto639@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2993-5945
Research Fellow, Sociological Institute - Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences
St. Petersburg, Russian FederationReferences
- Althusser, L. (1999). Machiavelli and Us. London; New York: Verso.
- Althusser, L. (2005). For Marx. Moscow: Praksis Publ. (In Russian).
- Althusser, L. (2006). Philosophy of the Encounter. Later Writings, 1978–87. London; New York: Verso.
- Assmann, J. (2022). Political Theology between Egypt and Israel. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal. (In Russian).
- Campanini, M. (2021). Political Theology of Violence: Religion and Revolution in a Few Contemporary Islamic Thinkers. In M. Campanini, M.D. Donato (Eds.), Islamic Political Theology (pp. 39–51). Lanham; Boulder: Lexington Books.
- Derrida, J. (2000). Of Grammatology. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).
- Kant, I. (1999). Critique of Pure Reason. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).
- Kondurov, V.E. (2019). Carl Schmitt’s Political Theology: Discourse and Methodological Approach. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN — Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the RAS, 14(3), 49–78. (In Russian).
- Meier, H. (2006). Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Negri, A. (1999). Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Schmitt, C. (2016). The Concept of the Political. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).
- Strauss, L. (2000). An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Moscow: Praksis Publ; Logos. (In Russian).
- Vetushinsky, A.S. (2018). In the name of matter: Critical and metaphysical studies. Perm: Gile Press. (In Russian).
- Žižek, S. (2008). Towards a Materialist Theology. Logos, 4(67), 55–66. (In Russian).
- Žižek, S. (2003). The Fragile Absolute: Or, Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For? Moscow: Art Magazine. (In Russian).