The Perception of Regional History and of the Great Patriotic War by the Youth of the Kaliningrad Region in the Context of the Attitude to the Figure of Joseph Stalin

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the historical memory of young people in the Kaliningrad Region. According to the hypothesis of the study, the specificity of its content depends on the respondents’ attitude to Stalin, around whose personality there are manipulations aimed at reducing the role of the Red Army in Second World War. The main method of the study was formalized interviews with young people aged 18-35 (n = 1108). Focus group interviews acted as an auxiliary scientific method that allowed for the interpretation of statistically processed empirical data. The results of the study revealed differences in emotional attitudes toward the end of the Great Patriotic War. The young people who have a negative attitude towards Stalin more often focus on the tragic events of the war, perceiving the 9th May as a day of mourning for the fallen and as a day of remembrance of what the people experienced during the war. Victory in the Great Patriotic War is in the eyes of the majority of young people in the region the main event in Russian history. However, young people who have a negative attitude towards Stalin are much less likely to assess the victory in the same way. This peculiarity is conditioned by family memory - as a rule, Stalin’s opponents more often keep in their memory tragic events in the lives of their relatives during the war. Differences were also found among young people in the Kaliningrad Region with respect to regional history. On the whole, respondents indicated that they were most interested in the Prussian and German periods of history. However, pro-Stalinist young people are also highly interested in the Soviet period. In addition, neutral and pro-Stalinist youths have an overwhelmingly positive attitude toward the renaming of Königsberg into Kaliningrad, while among Stalin’s opponents there is a high proportion of supporters of retaining the historical name (Königsberg).

About the authors

Mikhail I. Krishtal

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: MKrishtal@kantiana.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6167-1025

PhD in Geography, Research Fellow, Sociological Lab, Institute for Geopolitical and Regional studies

Kaliningrad, Russian Federation

References

  1. Assmann, A. (2014). Long shadow of the past: memorial culture and historical politics. Moscow. (In Russian).
  2. Bull, A.C., & Hansen, H.L. (2016). On agonistic memory. Memory Studies, 9(4), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698015615935
  3. Dementev, I.O. (2014). «What can I know?»: The formation of discourses on the past of Kaliningrad Oblast in the Soviet period (late 1940s–1980s). In People and texts: historical almanac. «Order» for history? Updating the information space of history (pp. 175–218). (In Russian).
  4. Dmitrieva, O.O. (2015). «Historical memory and the mechanisms of its formation: an analysis of historiographic concepts in Russian science». Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 6(361), 132–137. (In Russian).
  5. Ivanov, A.G. (2020). Everyday mythology: The sacrifice phenomenon in the narratives of family memory. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, (1), 80–87. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2227–6564.2020.1.80
  6. Just, T. (1992). The Past is Another Country: Myth and Memory in Postwar Europe. Daedalus, 121(4), 83–118.
  7. Krishtal, M.I. (2019). Electoral preferences within the Kaliningrad oblast in 2003–2018. Regional Research, 1(63), 99–107. (In Russian).
  8. Krishtal, M.I. (2021). Ideological preferences of Kaliningrad residents in the socio-political system. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 584–599. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2021-23-4-584-599
  9. Krishtal, M.I., & Shchekoturov, A.V. (2021). Sociological analysis of the socio-political attitudes of the residents of the Kaliningrad region in 2014–2020. Methodology and methods of analysis of socio-political sentiments, Kaliningrad. 128 p. (In Russian).
  10. Kuznetsova, T.Yu. (2016). Geo-demographic typology of municipalities of the Kaliningrad region. IKBFU’s Vestnik. Series: Natural and medical sciences, (1), 15–27. (In Russian).
  11. Lapshin, A.O. (2020). On comprehending the history yesterday and today. Vlast’, 21(2) 9–15. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i2.7129
  12. Makarychev, A.S., & Sergunin, A.A. (2013). «Soft power» in action: Germany and Kaliningrad. Russia and contemporary world, (1), 73–89. (In Russian).
  13. Mazhnikov, V.I. (2013). The historical memory of the Battle of Stalingrad as a factor of interethnic tolerance. Science Journal of VolSU. History. Area Studies. International Relations, 1(23), 8–13. (In Russian).
  14. Mchedlova, M.M. (2013). Public solidarity: projection of historical memory. Science Journal of VolSU. History. Area Studies. International Relations, 1(23), 85–90. (In Russian).
  15. Miller, A.I. (2020). Second World War in the “Wars of Memory”. The New Past, (4), 222–231. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18522/2500-3224-2020-4-222-231
  16. Myslivets, N.L., & Romanov, O.A. (2018). Historical memory as a social-cultural phenomenon: an attempt of sociological reconstruction. RUDN Journal of sociology, 18(1), 9–19. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2018-18-1-9-19
  17. Nazukina, M.V. (2020). Identity aspects of the regionalist discourse of federal symbolic competitions. Political science (RU). (4), 200–220. (In Russian). http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2020.04.10
  18. Neverov, A.Ya. (2018). Management of historical memory as a way of manipulating public consciousness. Socium i vlast, 1(69), 134–139. (In Russian).
  19. Ponomareva, E.G. (2020). The World War II and its falsification in the Russian youth representations. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 20(2), 307–322. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-2-307-322
  20. Puzanova, Zh.V., Narbut, N.P., Larina, T.I., & Tertyshnikova, A.G. (2020). Typology of Historical Memory about the World War II: Methodological Aspects of the Study (on the Example of the RUDN Students). RUDN Journal of Sociology, 20(2), 292–306. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-2-292-306
  21. Repina, L.P. (2012). Experience of social crises in historical memory. In L.P. Repina (ed.), Crises of critical epochs in historical memory (pp. 3–37). Moscow: Institute of World History. (In Russian).
  22. Rigney A. (2012). Transforming Memory and the European Project. New Literary History, 43(4), 607–628.
  23. Sorokina, N.D. (2020). What Influences the Historical Memory of Modern Students? Higher Education in Russia, 29(10), 144–152. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-10-144-152
  24. Toshhenko, Zh.T. (2000). Historical consciousness and historical memory: analysis of the modern state. Modern and Contemporary History, (4), 3–16. (In Russian).
  25. Yakushenkov, S.N., & Yakushenkova, O.S. (2016). «Power of land»: formation of new otherness in the conditions of frontier. Journal of Frontier Studies, (1), 9–21. (In Russian).
  26. Zimovina, E.P., & Prodantsov, K.S. (2022) Historical Memory in the Kaliningrad Region: the Common and Particular Across Generations. Herald of Anthropology, (2), 7–27. (In Russian).

Copyright (c) 2022 Krishtal M.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies