Factors of Influence of the Regional Political Elite in Modern Russia: Evidences from St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relevance of the research project is determined by the dominant role of elite groups in modern Russian politics. The opportunity and ability of the elite to solve topical social issues to a large extent depend on the degree of their influence. The article presents the results of an expert study in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region (late November to early December 2021). Representatives of the regional political elite themselves, as well as “key informants” acted as experts. The technology for collecting expert information included a set of qualitative and quantitative methods (methods of grouping data with an estimate of the average values of the variation series and dispersion measures, as well as multidimensional scaling, factorial and cluster analysis). The evaluation was carried out on 22 parameters. In St. Petersburg, six factors are associated with the strategies used by the authorities to strengthen their influence: the conditions of general and political socialization; dominant communication strategies of politicians based on the type of their leadership; economic resources; informal grounds for political career related to the politicians’ families; cultivation of clientelism, atypical for a metropolis; the regional elite having work experience in other areas, in addition to public administration and public policy. The politicians themselves are mostly attracted to three image types: a) a productive political “heavyweight”, belonging to a clan by birthright or “overgrown” with economic and informal ties, including with “shadow structures”, who has real economic opportunities to influence the situation in the region; b) a “political tribune”, who actively communicates with the population and relies on cultivating a stable positive attitude towards themselves among the inhabitants of the region; c) an “insider”, connected with the region by their destiny and having stable political views. The study showed that in St. Petersburg, public communicative activity online and offline is not a significant condition for strengthening the “political weight” of a politician; belonging to a clan (family, friend group, professional clan) is much more important. Experts deny that accentuated masculine or feminine behaviour patterns of politicians in St. Petersburg are a significant factor in strengthening their influence. In the Leningrad Region, the configuration of the latent factors influencing the significance of politicians is different. The most important factors include the following: the channel and method of politician’s recruitment to power; the activity of personal information policy on the Internet; the presence of social, human and status capital through birth in a certain family or effective interaction with certain influential regional groups; an accentuated demonstration of personal resources; the presence of real leadership qualities; control over economic resources in the region. Five dominant types of politicians were identified in terms of the various qualities exploited by them and demonstrated to the public. The importance of the ability of politicians to large-scale, strategic thinking in solving regional problems and the accentuated gender type of behaviour in public politics was confirmed.

About the authors

Olga V. Popova

St. Petersburg State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: o.popova@spbu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0701-7767

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Professor, the Head of the Department of Political Institutes and Applied Political Studies

Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation

References

  1. Amin, A. (2017). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. Economy. Routledge, 59–72.
  2. Burton, M., & Higley, J. (2001). The study of political elite transformations. International Review of Sociology, 11(2), 181–199.
  3. Burton, M., Gunther, R., & Higley, J. (Eds.). (1992). Introduction: Elite transformations and democratic regime. In Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe (pp. 1–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,.
  4. Burton, V., & Higley, J. (1987). Invitation to elite theory. The basic contentions reconsidered. In Domhoff, W.G., & Th. Dye (Eds.), Power elites and organization (pp. 219–238). Beverly Hills: Sage, P.U.F.
  5. Bystrova, A.S., Daugavet, A.B., Duka, A.V., Kolesnik, N.V., Nevsky, A.V., & Tev, D.B. (2019). Institutionalization of the political elite: Sources of recruitment and careers. Power and Elites, 6(2), 24–66.
  6. Cameron, R., & Turovsky, R.F. (2015). Centralized but fragmented: The regional dimension of «Russia’s party of power». Demokratizatsiya. Washington, DC, 23(2), 205–223.
  7. Chirikova, A.E. (2010). Regional elites. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russian).
  8. Clegg, S. (2016). The necessity and possibility of powerful ‘regional’ knowledge: curriculum change and renewal. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(4), 457–470.
  9. Dragoman, D., & Gheorghiţă, B. (2016). Regional design, local autonomy, and ethnic struggle: Romania’s syncopated regionalization. Europe-Asia Studies, 68(2), 270–290.
  10. Duka, A.V. (2017). Transformation of post-Soviet political and administrative elites. Actual Problems of Europe, 2, 14–54.
  11. Duka, A.V. (2021). Mobility and endogeneity of regional political and administrative elites. Power and Elites, 8(1), 66–99. https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2021.8.1.3.
  12. Duka, A.V. (2021). Institutionalization of the regional administrative elite: Recruitment pool and career trajectories. Power and Elites, 8(2), 21–54. https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2021.8.2.2
  13. Errejón, Í., & Guijarro, J. (2016). Post-neoliberalism’s difficult hegemonic consolidation: A comparative analysis of the Ecuadorean and Bolivian processes. Latin American Perspectives, 43(1), 34–52.
  14. Gaeva, A.V. (2012). Theoretical approaches to the study of the effectiveness of the political elite. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University, (1), 125–131. (In Russian).
  15. Gaman-Golutvina, O.V. (2004). Russian regional elites: Personal composition and evolution trends (II). Polis. Political Studies, 3, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.03.03
  16. Gaman-Golutvina, O.V. (2006). Political Elites of Russia: Milestones of Historical Evolution. Moscow: ROSSPEN.
  17. Gaman-Golutvina, O.V. (2016). Political elites as an object of research in domestic political science. Political Science, (2), 38–73.
  18. Gaman-Golutvina, O.V. (2020). Political elites in the focus of comparative analysis. Moscow: Aspect Press.
  19. Garrido-Vergara, L. (2013). Elites, political elites and social change in modern societies. Revista de Sociología, 28, 31–49. https://doi.org/10.5354/0716-632X.2013.30713
  20. Gritsenko, N.P. (2010). Regional political elites in modern Russia: Resources of influence on the political process. Society and Power, 1(25), 6–69.
  21. Higley, J., & Pakulski, J. (2000). Elite power games and democratic politics in Central and Eastern Europe. In M. Dobry (Ed.), Democratic and Capitalist Transitions in Eastern Europe. Lessons for the Social Science (pp. 109–129). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  22. Higley, J., Hoffmann-Lange, U., Kadushin, C., & Moore, G. (1991). Elite integration in stable democracies: A reconsideration. European Sociological Review, 7, 35–53.
  23. Higley, J., Pakulski, J., & Wesołowski, W. (Eds.) (1998). Introduction: Elite change and democratic regimes in Eastern Europe. In Postcommunist Elites and Democracy in Eastern Europe (pp. 1–33). London: Macmillan.
  24. Ivanova, L.A. (2021). Sociological analysis of the attitude of the regional elite to their position and existing problems (on the example of the Astrakhan region). Kazan Social and Humanitarian Bulletin, (4), 21–26.
  25. Khabarov, I.A. (2016). Incorporation of subregional elite groups into power: Tactical models of behavior. Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series Political Science and Law, 2(4), 28–39. (In Russian).
  26. Kleibrink, A. (2015). Political Elites and Decentralization Reforms in the Post-socialist Balkans: Regional Patronage Networks in Serbia and Croatia. Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Kolesnik, N.V. (2019). Educational trajectories of the Russian elite: Regional projection. World of Russia, 28(4), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2019-28-4-30-48
  28. Kolyadin, A.M. (2016). “Interest group” versus “elite”: A. Bentley’s theory in the context of elitist views (G. Mosca, V. Pareto, R. Michels). Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science, 3(35), 186–191.
  29. Kovin, V.S., & Petrova, R.I. (2019). Competitive model of recruiting heads in the political space of the industrial cities of the Urals: Specificity and typology. Ars Administrandi (The Art of Government), 11(2), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2019-2-267-286
  30. Kryshtanovskaya, O.V. (2005). Anatomy of the Russian elite. Moscow: Zakharov.
  31. Kuzio, T. (2015). Rise and fall of the party of regions political machine. Problems of PostCommunism, 62(3), 174–186.
  32. Lanigan, C. (2017). Region-building in the North East: Regional identity and regionalist politics. In A Region in Transition (pp. 104–119). Routledge.
  33. Lapina, N.Yu., & Chirikova, A.E. (1999). Regional Elites in the Russian Federation: Models of Behavior and Political Orientations. Moscow: INION.
  34. Ledyaev, V.G. (2008). The administrative class as a subject of political domination in modern Russia. Pro nunc: Contemporary Political Processes, 8, 40–66. (In Russian).
  35. Loboiko, D.A. (2018). Modern mechanisms for updating the regional political elite in the Russian Federation. Theories and Problems of Political Researches, 7(4A), 20–26.
  36. Matveev, I.A. (2019). Big business in Putin’s Russia: Old and new sources of influence on power. World of Russia, 28, (1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2019-28-1-54-74 (In Russian).
  37. Morgan, K. (2017). Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialization. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 569–583.
  38. Ochirova, V.M. (2016). Social origin as a mechanism for the formation of political elites in multi-ethnic regions of Russia (on the example of Buryatia, Sakha (Yakutia) and Tuva). New Researches of Tuva, 2. Retrieved January 07, 2022, from http://nit.tuva. asia/nit/article/view/99
  39. Perfiliev, Yu.S. (2018). Regional models of interaction between business and political elites (on the example of the Irkutsk region). Society: politics, economics, law, (1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2018.1.3
  40. Pokatov, D.V. (2020). Domestic sociology of the political elite: Current trends in regional development. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University, (453), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/453/14
  41. Ponedelkov, A.V., Averin, A.N., & Magomedov, K.O. (2016). Personnel potential of the political and administrative elite and its role in the implementation of state social policy. In Elitology and development strategies of modern Russia (pp. 321–345). Proceedings of the Second All-Russian Elite Congress with International Participation. Rostov-on-Don: RANEPA Publishing House.
  42. Ponedelkov, A.V., Starostin, A.M., & Shvets, L.G. (2015). Leadership-elite component of political processes in expert and mass consciousness (regional aspect). Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University, (2), 1–14.
  43. Popova, O.V. (2013). Career strategies of subfederal political elites. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series 6. Political science. International Relations, 1, 49–56. (In Russian).
  44. Reisinger, W.M., & Moraski, B.J. (2017). The regional roots of Russia’s political regime. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  45. Rodionov, M.A., & Volkova, T.A. (2016). Modern political elites of Russia. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, (5), 116–127. (In Russian).
  46. Rodionov, M.A., & Volkova, T.A. (2017). Competitiveness of political elites. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, 6, 179–191. (In Russian).
  47. Sharin, I.A. (2019). Regional political elites. Skif, (3), 164–170. (In Russian).
  48. Shentyakova, A.V. (2014). Motivation and career building strategies for representatives of the regional elite. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Series 6. Political Science, (2), 111–119.
  49. Shentyakova, A.V. (2020). Consolidation of the Russian elite as a factor of state identity politics. Power and Elites, 7(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2020.7.1.1 (In Russian).
  50. Usova, Yu.V. (2015). Political elites of the regions of modern Russia: transformation factors and positioning vectors. Vladikavkaz: IPC SOIGSI VSC RAS & North Ossetia-A. (In Russian).
  51. Usova, Yu.V. (2020). Administrative and political elites of modern Russia in the regional dimension. Questions of elitology, (4), 123–137. (In Russian).
  52. Zhukov, D.S., Seltzer, D.G., & Barabash, N.S. (2020). System-dynamic model of reproduction of regional elites in the USSR and Russia. Innovation and expertise: scientific papers, (1), 90–102. (In Russian).

Copyright (c) 2022 Popova O.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies