“Digital Leviathan”: Scenarios for the Development of the Hobbesian Monster in the 21st Century
- Authors: Mamychev A.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Issue: Vol 24, No 3 (2022): Internet and Politics
- Pages: 367-392
- Section: DIGITAL POLITICS
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/view/31845
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-3-367-392
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
In the research, the Hobbesian concept of “Leviathan” is used as a metaphor and a “heuristic scheme” describing the change of epochs and the formation of a new universal scale for innovative forms of socio-political organization. The subject of the research is the phenomenon of digitalization, as well as key changes caused by the digital transformation of public policy and power relations. “Digitalization” is considered as an ambiguous and multilevel phenomenon, reflecting a whole series of cardinal transformations in the sociopolitical life of society, which at the ideological, institutional, instrumental, technological and praxiological levels “clears space” for new forms of social organization. Аrgues that currently there is an acute competition to define, legitimize and promote a certain “projective image of the future” corresponding to the latest socio-political order and normative sociotechnological system (“engineering law”). In particular, the author considers contradictory trends, on the one hand, aimed at preserving and reproducing traditional political institutions, and on the other, related to forming new digital era institutions, digital governance structures and practices of public-power interactions. The research pays special attention to the competition of the state and new digital and technological actors in the political space. It discusses various scenarios of digital transformation of society, state, and government and considers such digital effects in the modern political process as “information noise”, “information overload”, “profile reconfigurations” of relations, the formation of alternative digital spaces (metaverses), as well as their influence on the current political order, power relations, socio-political dynamics.
About the authors
Andrey Yu. Mamychev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: mamychev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1325-7967
Doctor of Political Science, Professor of the Department of Russian Politics, Head of the Laboratory of Political and Legal Studies, Faculty of Political Science
Moscow, Russian FederationReferences
- Alabina, T.A., Dzangieva, H.S., & Yushkovskaya, A.A. (2022). Metaverse as a global economic trend. Economy. Profession. Business, (1), 5–12. (In Russian).
- Alpidovskaya, M.L. (2021). Notes on the new reality: comprehension of global plans. Moscow: Prometey Publishing House. (In Russian).
- Braidotti, R. (2021). The Posthuman. Moscow: Publishing house of the Gaidar Institute. (In Russian). [Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.]
- Brockman, J. (2017). What to Think About Machines That Think: Today’s Leading Thinkers on the Age of Machine Intelligence: The world’s leading scientists about artificial intelligence. Moscow: Alpina non-fiction. (In Russian). [Brockman, J. (2015). What to Think About Machines That Think: Leading Thinkers on Artificial Intelligence and What It Means to Be Human. Edge Question]
- Bennett, J. (2018). Vibrant Matter: The Political Ecology of Things. Perm: Gile Press. (In Russian). [Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: The Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623]
- Chistov, K.V. (1986). Folk traditions and folklore: Essays on theory. Leningrad: Nauka. (In Russian).
- Clough, P. (2018). The affective turn: political economy, biomedia and bodies. Theory, Culture and Society, 25(1), 1–22.
- Coleman, S. (2018). Can the Internet strengthen democracy? St. Petersburg: Aleteya. (In Russian). [Coleman, S. (2017). Can the Internet strengthen democracy? Polity Press].
- De Landa, M. (2014). War in the era of intelligent machines. Moscow: Institute of General Humanitarian Research. (In Russian). [De Landa, M. (1991). War in the era of intelligent machines. New York: Zone Books]
- De Landa, M. (2018). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Perm: Gile Press. (In Russian). [De Landa, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London & New York: Continuum. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350096769]
- Filipova, I.A. (2020). Legal regulation of artificial intelligence. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State University. (In Russian).
- Foucault, M. (2010). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France,1978-1979. St. Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russian). [Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.]
- Foucault, M. (2016). The discipline and punish. The Birth of the prison. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian). [Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.]
- Gaase, K., Danilov, V., Dudenkova, I., Kralechkin, D., & Safonov, P. (Eds.) (2020). Goodbye, COVID? Moscow: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute. (In Russian).
- Greenfield, A. (2017). Radical technologies: The design of everyday life. Moscow: Publishing House “Delo” RANEPA. (In Russian). [Greenfield, A. (2018). Radical technologies: The design of everyday life. Verso.]
- Haraway, D. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp.149181). New York; Routledge.
- Hobbes, T. (2001) Leviathan, or matter, forme and power of a commonwealth ecclesiasticall and civill. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian). [Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan: Or the matter, forme, and power of a commonwealth ecclesiasticall and civill.]
- Isaev, I.A. (2021). “Power machine” in virtual space (image formation). Moscow: Prospect. (In Russian).
- Jaspers, K. (1994). The origin and goal of history. Moscow: Republic. (In Russian). [Jaspers, K. (1953). The origin and goal of history. Yale University Press.]
- Kochetkov, A.P. (2020). Transnational elites in the global world. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russian).]
- Koroleva, E.V. (2009). Strategic alliances: foreign experience and Russian features. Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin, 5 (May), 3–12. (In Russian).
- Kudryavtseva, T.Yu., & Kozhina, K.S. (2021). Basic concepts of digitalization. Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge, 44(3), 149–151. (In Russian).
- Mamychev, A.Yu., Kim, A.A., & Frolova, E.E. (2020). “The future” as an attractor of modern political-legal and socio-economic transformations: an overview of the main problems and approaches. Advances in Law studies, 8, Special issue, 3–17. (In Russian).
- Markarian, E.S. (1992). Tradition as an Object of System Study. World Futures, 34. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Tradition-as-an-Object-of-system-study-Markar ian/7043008ceaef26fe7e83446663160119c49026b2
- Mikhailova, O.V. (2013). Networks in politics and public administration. Moscow: KDU Publishing House. (In Russian).
- Montfort, N. (2021). The future: Principles and practices of creation. Moscow: Strelka Press. (In Russian). [Montfort, N. (2017). The future. The MIT Press.]
- Morkhat, P.R. (2018). Law and artificial intelligence. Moscow: UNITY-DANA. (In Russian).
- Nietzsche, F. (2005). The will to power. Experience of revaluation of all values: The unfinished treatise of Friedrich Nietzsche in the reconstruction of Elisabeth Foerster-Nietzsche and Peter Gast. M.: Cultural Revolution. (In Russian). [Nietzsche, F. (1901). The will to power.]
- Osipov, V.A. (2021). Digitizing Leviathan: about some cases of virtual and cyberstates (pp. 64-68). In L.A. Gainutdinova (Ed.), Herzen Readings: Russia-2021. Topical issues of political knowledge. Proceedings of the scientific and practical conference. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the A.I. Herzen State Pedagogical University. (In Russian).
- Outsourcing of political judgments: problems of communication on digital platforms. (2021). Moscow: Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN). (In Russian).
- Ovchinnikov, A.I. (2021). “Digital Leviathan” and human rights: risks of innovations in law and public administration. Legal Technique, (15), 227–230. (In Russian).
- Pentland, A. (2018). Social Physics: How good ideas spread — The lessons of a new science. Moscow: Publishing House AST. (In Russian). [Pentland, A. (2014). Social Physics: How good ideas spread — The lessons of a new science. Penguin Press.]
- Petrov, M., Burov, V., Shklyaruk, M., & Sharov, A. (2018). The state as a platform. (Cyber) the state for the digital economy. Moscow: Center for Strategic Research. Retrieved from https://www. csr.ru/upload/iblock/313/3132b2de9ccef0db1eecd56071b98f5f.pdf (accessed: 10.05.2022). (In Russian).
- Rosenberg, L.B. (2017). The effect of a human bee swarm, a technique of parallel distribution of intelligence in real time. Science and Technology. Retrieved May 25, 2022, from: https://okoplanet.su/science/scienceday/386345-effekt-chelovecheskogo-pchelinogo-roya-metodikaparallelnogo-raspredelennogo-intellekta-v-rezhime-realnogo-vremeni.html (In Russian).
- Rozin, V.M. (Ed.). (1997). Philosophy of Technology: history and modernity. Moscow: IFRAN. (In Russian).
- Savchuk, V.V. (Ed.). (2020). Critique of the digital mind. St. Petersburg: Academy of Culture Research. (In Russian).
- Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: EKSMO. (In Russian). [Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.]
- Schwab, K., & Mallere, T. (2022). COVID-19: The Great Reset. Geneva: World Economic Forum Publishing House.
- Shnurenko, I.A. (2021). To kill the leviathan. Nasha zavtra (In Russian).
- Sztompka, P. (2012). Trust is the basis of society. Moscow: Logos. (In Russian). [Sztompka, P. (2007) Zaufanie: Fundament spoleczenstwa. Krakow, Znak]
- Skinner, K. (2018). Digital human: The fourth revolution of humanity includes everyone. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber. (In Russian). [Skinner, K. (2018). Digital human: The fourth revolution of humanity includes everyone. Marshall Cavendish International (Asia)].
- Tikhomirov, Yu.A., & Nanba, S.B. (Eds.). (2019). The legal concept of robotization. Moscow: Prospect. (In Russian).
- Thacker, E. (2020). Three texts about infection. Perm: Gile Press. (In Russian).
- Veselov, Yu.V. (2020). Trust in digital society. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Sociology, 13(2), 129–143. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2020.202 (In Russian).
- Vetrenko, I.A. (Ed.). (2022). Digitalization of society and the social credit system: Problems, prospects. St. Petersburg: CPI SZIU RANEPA. (In Russian).
- Volodenkov, S.V., & Fedorchenko, S.N. (2022). Traditional political institutions in the conditions of digitalization: risks and prospects of transformation. Discourse-Pi, 19(1), 84–103. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17506/18179568_2022_19_1_84 (In Russian).
- Walsh, T. (2019). 2062: The World that AI Made. Moscow: AST Publishing House. (In Russian). [Walsh, T. (2018). 2062: The World that AI Made. La Trobe University Press.]
- Zaikovsky, V.N. (2014). “Service state”: a new paradigm or a modern technology of public administration? National interests: priorities and security, 24(261), 18–28. (In Russian).
- Zolaev, E.A. (2021). Digital state as a new stage of society development. Creative Economy, 15(5), 1583–1594. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.15.5.112164 (In Russian).
- Zuboff, S. (2022). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Moscow: Publishing House of the Gaidar Institute (In Russian). [Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Profile books].