Feminist Foreign Policy: Selected Issues of Conceptualization and Implementation

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Feminist foreign policy (FFP) is a relatively new approach in the theory of international relations. Disclosing the heuristic potential of the concept is especially relevant due to the new political challenges of international conflicts that have different consequences for men and women. For the first time in Russian political science, this article analyzes the conceptual history of the FFP and the factors that influenced the implementation of this concept at the global level. The research is based on the publications and works of women, historical documents of international women’s forums, scientific works on feminism theory and the international relations theory, policy papers of political parties, speeches of political leaders, government documents on the conduct of the FFP, UN resolutions. In addition to general scientific methods, the authors use the comparative-historical and systemic methods. The article presents the intellectual origins of the FFP, the role of the women’s suffrage and pacifist movements in the development of the concept, the importance of women/gender/feminist academic research for the conceptualization of the FFP, as well as the contribution of politicians from leading world powers to the development of the concept. The authors analyze in detail the “Hillary Doctrine” and the UN feminist resolutions as forerunners of the official introduction of the term FFP into the theory and practice of international relations. The article assesses the potential of the FFP as an international strategy for gender equality and sustainable development. The authors conclude that a feminist political perspective works hand in hand with the vision of sustainable development policies and represents an increasingly relevant concept and practice that can be a strategic step towards the culture of peace.

About the authors

Valentina I. Uspenskaya

Tver State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: v.uspenskaya2014@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9559-2728

PhD in Philosophy, Assoc. Prof of the Political Science Department, Director of the women history and gender studies Center

Tver, Russian Federation

Nataliya N. Kozlova

Tver State University

Email: tver-rapn@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1212-6412

Doctor of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Political Science Department

Tver, Russian Federation

References

  1. Aggestam, K., & Bergman-Rosamond, A. (2016). Swedish feminist foreign policy in the making: Ethics, politics and gender. Ethics and International Affairs, 30(3), 323–334.
  2. Alekseeva, T.A., & Lebedeva, M.M. (2006). “The Invisible Woman” in world politics: lessons for Russia. In J.A. Tickner, Gender in International Relations. Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security (pp. 7–22). Moscow: Kulturnaya revolyuciya. (In Russian).
  3. Alyusheva, N.I., & Uspenskaya, V.I. (2020). Feminist approach to the theory of international relations. In V.P. Gavrikov (Ed.), Socio-political Processes in a Changing World (pp. 64–67). Issue 20. Tver: TvSU. (In Russian).
  4. Boulding, E. (2001). Building a culture of peace: Some priorities. NWSA Journal, 13–2, 55–59.
  5. Clinton, H. (2014). Hard Choices. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  6. Cockburn, C. (1998). The Space Between Us: Negotiating Gender and National Identities in Conflict. London: Zed Book.
  7. Cockburn, C. (2007). From Where We Stand: War, Women’s Activism and Feminist Analysis. London and New York: Zed Books.
  8. Cockburn, C. (2010). Gender relations as causal in militarization and war. International Feminist Journal of Politics, June, 139–157.
  9. Enloe, C. (1989). Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  10. Enloe, C. (2016). Globalization and Militarism: Feminists Make the Link. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  11. Hudson, V.M., & Leidl, P. (2015). The Hillary Doctrine: Sex and American Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
  12. Issraelyan, E.V. (2018). Justin Trudeau foreign policy: Gender aspects. USA & Canada Journal, (6), 66–78. (In Russian).
  13. Meinzolt, H., Magallón, C., & et al. (Eds.). (2019). Women Vote Peace: Zurich Peace Congress 1919–2019. Zurich: BoD.
  14. Nelaeva, G.A. (2017). “Women, peace and security” agenda in EU policy-making. World Politics, 2, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8671.2017.2.22636 (In Russian).
  15. Owens, P. (2018). Women and the history of international thought. International Studies Quarterly, 62(3), 467–481.
  16. Paull, J. (2018). The women who tried to stop the Great War: The International Congress of Women at the Hague 1915. In A.H. Campbell (Ed.), Global Leadership Initiatives for Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding (Chapter 12) (pp. 249–266). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  17. Robinson, F. (2021). Feminist foreign policy as ethical foreign policy? A care ethics perspective. Journal of International Political Theory, 17(4), 20–37.
  18. Runyan, A., & Peterson, S. (2014). Global Gender Issues in the New Millennium. New York: Imprint, Routledge.
  19. Shvedova, N.A. (2020). Celebrating the anniversary: Gender equality issues among un priorities. Woman in Russian Society, 3, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.21064/WinRS.2020.3.2 (In Russian).
  20. Srdjan, V. (2017). A nation of feminist arms dealers? Canada and military exports. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 72(4), 503–519.
  21. Sylvester, C. (1994). Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Tickner, J.A. (1992). Gender in International Relations. Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press [Tickner, J.A. (2006). Gender in International Relations. Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. Moscow: Kulturnaya revolutsia. (In Russian)].
  23. Tickner, J.A., & True, J. (2018). A century of international relations feminism: From World War I women’s peace pragmatism to the women, peace and security agenda. International Studies Quarterly, 62(2), 221–233.
  24. True, J. (1995). Feminism. In S. Burchill, A. Linklater, R. Devetak, M. Paterson & J. True (Eds.), Theories of International Relations (pp. 213–234). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  25. Vibben, A. T.R. (2015). Feminist approach to the study of international relations. Modern Science of International Relations Abroad: a textbook: in 3 vols. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 1, 690–712. (In Russian).
  26. Vinogradova, S.M. (2010). State, security, sovereignty: international relations in the mirror of feminism. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 4, 53–68. (In Russian).
  27. Voronina, O.A. (Ed.). Gender Equality in the Modern World: The Role of National Mechanisms. Moscow: MAX Press. (In Russian).
  28. Zhigaleva, Y.E. (2017). Sweden’s feminist foreign policy: A new approach to international relations? Innovative Scientific Research: Theory, Methodology, Practice: Proceedings of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference. Penza: Nauka i Prosveshchenie, 265–270. (In Russian).
  29. Zhukova, E., Sundström, R.M., & Elgström, O. (2021). Feminist foreign policies (FFPs) as strategic narratives: Norm translation in Sweden, Canada, France, and Mexico. Review of International Studies, 48(1), 217.

Copyright (c) 2022 Uspenskaya V.I., Kozlova N.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies