Not the Far-Right Only: Which Parties Occupy the Niche of Cultural Protectionism in the EU Countries?

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the 2010s many moderate parties in Europe began to use the agenda of the far-rights, competing with them on the same field. This article is devoted to the problem of inter-party competition in European countries amidst the rise of far-right parties. We also intended to check if the far-right profile is the same for all EU countries. To achieve the goal of the study, we used two databases on party positioning - MARPOR (Comparative Manifesto Project) and CHES (Chapel Hill Expert Survey). The study revealed that the consolidated family of the far-rights exists only in the countries of North-Western Europe, while in the countries of East-Central Europe the agenda of the far-rights is less consolidated and regionally heterogeneous. The mainstream competitors of the far-rights included mostly conservatives in North-Western Europe, and various parties, including the Social Democrats, in East-Central Europe. The study confirmed the hypothesis about the serious influence of the far-rights on mainstream politics. At the same time, it questioned the traditional approach which attributes the far-right profile only to far-right parties and ignores both regional differences and the factor of spatial competition.

About the authors

Ivan I. Petrov

HSE University

Author for correspondence.
Email: iip95@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3856-2503

postgraduate at the Postgraduate School of Political Science

Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Abou-Chadi, T. (2016). Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts–how green and radical right parties differ in their impact. British Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 417–436.
  2. Adams, J. et al. (2006). Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998, American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 513–529.
  3. Arzheimer, K. (2009). Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002, American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 259–275.
  4. Bakker, R. et al. (2015). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010, Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152.
  5. Bale, T. (2003). Cinderella and her ugly sisters: the mainstream and extreme right in Europe’s bipolarising party systems, West European Politics, 26(3), 67–90.
  6. Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. Routledge.
  7. Dalton, R.J. (1996). Political cleavages, issues, and electoral change, Comparing Democracies: Elections and voting in global perspective, 2, 319–342.
  8. De Vries, C.E., & Hobolt, S.B. (2012). When dimensions collide: The electoral success of issue entrepreneurs, European Union Politics, 13(2), 246–268.
  9. Green-Pedersen, C. (2019). The Reshaping of West European Party Politics: Agenda-Setting and Party Competition in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press.
  10. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage, Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135.
  11. Hutter, S., & Kriesi, H. (Eds.). (2019). European party politics in times of crisis. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Inglehart, R.F., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash.
  13. Kitschelt, H., & Rehm, P. (2015). Party alignments. Change and continuity. In P. Baramendi et. al (Eds.), The politics of advanced capitalism (pp. 179–201). Cambridge University Press.
  14. Lipset, S.M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: an introduction. Free Press.
  15. Makarenko, B.I. (2015). Parties and party systems: modern tendencies of development. Political encyclopedia. (In Russian).
  16. Makarenko, B.I. (2018). Populism and political institutions: comparative perspective. Populism as common challenge. In B.I. Makarenko & N.V. Petrov (Eds.), Political encyclopedia (pp. 27–36). Moscow. (In Russian).
  17. Mudde, C. (2013). Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: So what? European Journal of Political Research, 52(1), 1–19.
  18. Mudde, C. (2019). The far right today. John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Norris, P. et al. (2005). Radical right: Voters and parties in the electoral market. Cambridge University Press.
  20. Okuneva, L.S., & Tevdoj-Burmuli, A.I. (Eds.). (2020). Right populism: global trend and regional features. Moscow: MGIMO-University. (In Russian).
  21. Oskolkov, P.V., & Tevdoj-Burmuli, A.I. (2018). European right-wing populism and nationalism: revisiting the correlation of features. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 3, 19–33. (In Russian).
  22. Sergeev, E.A. (2020). Economic programs of Dutch right populists. In L.S. Okuneva & A.I. Tevdoj-Burmuli (Eds.), Right populism: global trend and regional features (pp. 104–121). Moscow: MGIMO-University. (In Russian).
  23. Shein, S.A. (2020). Responses of European mainstream to right-wing populism challenges from the perspective of the resilience concept: Case of the United Kingdom. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 22(1), 59–70. (In Russian).
  24. Volkens, A. et al. (Eds.). (2013). Mapping policy preferences from texts: statistical solutions for manifesto analysts. OUP Oxford, 3.

Copyright (c) 2021 Petrov I.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies