Cover Page

Cite item


The article analyzes the phenomenon of the “Kryashen question” during the 2002 census. The events related to the mentioned phenomenon generated a large-scale national relations crisis in the Republic of Tatarstan. The aim of this study is to answer the question: “Does the Kryashen question really exist or was it artificially constructed?” To answer this question, the author uses the method of event analysis in this research, obtaining information from the media (both from informational sources and socio-political publications). Another method used in this survey is the retrospective situational analysis of the data: the reconstruction of events post factum relying only on factual presentations and actions of the parties. This method is used to establish interrelations between the interest groups and possible development of the situation. In the research, the author identifies key actors in the campaign for developing the Kryashens’ aspirations to register themselves as a separate ethnic group (separate census category). The research also presents the pattern of their interaction and clarifies the positions of different parties engaged in the Kryashen occurrence. The author also highlights the intervening factors reinforcing the development of the crisis in interethnic relations. In conclusion, the author points out the delusiveness of “Kryashen problem” and the pointless nature of dispute between the conflicting parties (by using different explanatory models of ethnicity and the actual recognition of Kryashens as a special subconfessional group by all parties).

About the authors

Andrew Eugenievich Denisov

Center of Islamic Studies, Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan

Author for correspondence.
Email: Count-Denisov@yandex.ru

Research Fellow of the Center of Islamic Studies, Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan

Levobulachnaya Str. 36A, Kazan, Russian Federation, 420111


  1. Barkar` E.V. Starokreshhyonny`e i novokreshhyonny`e tatary` [The Tartars: Old and New Periods of Baptism]. Al`manax “Al`fa i Omega”. 2009. № 57. Available from: http://www.pravmir.ru/starokreshhyonyie-i-novokreshhyonyie-tataryi/. Accessed: 16.06.2018. (In Russ.).
  2. Vert P. Pravoslavie, inoslavie, inoverie: Ocherki po istorii religioznogo raznoobraziya Rossijskoj imperii [Orthodoxy, Unorthodoxy, Heterodoxy: an Outline of the History of Religious Diversity in the Russian Empire]. Transl. by N. Mishakovoj, M. Dolbilova, E. Zuevoj. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; 2012. 280 p. (In Russ.).
  3. Demoskop Weekly. Institut demografii Nacional`nogo issledovatel`skogo universiteta “Vy`sshaya shkola e`konomiki” [Demoscope Weekly. Institute of Demography, National research center “Higher School of Economics”]. Available from: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/ census.php?cy=1. Accessed: 16.06.2018. (In Russ.).
  4. Denisov A.E. Praktika e`tnicheskoj mobilizacii cherez prizmu teorii nacionalizma Dzhona Xatchinsona (na primere Kryashenskogo dvizheniya) [The Practice of Ethnic Mobilization through the Lens of John Hatchinson’s Nationalistic Theory (in the Context of Kryashen movement)]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya. 2017; 4: 49—61 (In Russ.).
  5. Ilizarova V.V. E`tnicheskaya identichnost` kryashen i instituty` eyo podderzhaniya [Ethnic Identity of the Kryashens and the Institutions of its Support]. E`tnosocium. 2012; 11: 84—90 (In Russ.).
  6. Istoriya i kul`tura tatar-kryashen (XVI—XX vv.): kollektivnaya monografiya [The History and Culture of the Kryashen Tatars (16th — 20th centuries): Joint Monograph]. Kazan`: Institut istorii im. Sh. Mardzhani AN RT; 2017. 960 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Sevast`yanov I.V. Kryasheny` Tatarstana: religiya i problema e`tnicheskogo samoopredeleniya [The Kryashens of Tatarstan: Religion and the Problem of Ethnic Identity]. Problemy` istorii, filologii, kul`tury`. 2017; Vol. 4; 58: 345—361 (In Russ.).
  8. Sokolovskij S.V. Kryasheny` vo Vserossijskoj perepisi naseleniya 2002 goda [Kryashens in All-Russia Census of 2002]. Moscow: Orgservis-2000; 2004. 247 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Fokin A.V. Kryasheny` — sud`ba moya: e`pizody` istorii, teorii i praktiki kryashenskogo nacional`nogo dvizheniya [Kryashens are My Destiny: Episodes in History, Theory and Practice of the Kryashen ethnic movement]. Kazan`: Tipografiya “Intelpress+”; 2013. 203 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Sharafiev E`.I. Ustav e`tnograficheskogo kul`turno-prosvetitel`skogo ob``edineniya kryashen 1990 g. [The Regulations of Ethnographic Cultural-Educational Association of the Kryashens 1990]. Kryashenskoe istoricheskoe obozrenie. 2017; 2: 153—160 (In Russ.).
  11. E`tnografiya i tanceval`ny`j fol`klor narodov Srednego Povolzh`ya: uchebnoe posobie [Ethnography and Dance Folklore of the Peoples of Middle Volga Region: Learning Guide]. Ed. by R.M. Valeeva. Kazan`: Kazanskij gosudarstvenny`j universitet kul`tury` i iskusstv'; 2017. 305 p. (In Russ.).
  12. E`tnografiya tatarskogo naroda [The Ethnography of the Tatar People]. Ed. by D.M. Isxakova. Kazan`: Magarif; 2004. 287 p. (In Russ.).
  13. Ethnicity And Beyond: Theories And Dilemmas Of Jewish Group Demarcation. Ed. by Eli Lederhendler. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. 256 p.
  14. From Ethnic Studies: Issues and Approaches. Ed. by Philip Q. Yang. N.Y.: State University of New York Press; 2000. 336 p.
  15. Visoka G., Gjevori E. Census Politics and Ethnicity in the Western Balkans. East European Politics. 2013; Vol. 29; 4: 479—498.
  16. Yancey W.L., Ericksen P., Juliani R.N. Emergent Ethnicity: A Review and Reformulation. American Sociological Review. 1976; Vol. 41; 3: 391—403.

Copyright (c) 2018 Denisov A.E.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies