Cover Page

Cite item


The article analyzes the issue of development of regional integration processes and for-mation of integration structures within post-Soviet space. Within the last decade one of the most dynamically evolving regional integration project is so called the “Eurasian project”? connected with the creation of Eurasian economic union (EAEU). At the moment this integration structure is not a full-fledged one and is susceptible to a number of specific risks. One of the major one is dependence on the deep-rooted “bad integration practices”, or post-Soviet integration path dependence. Previously it led to slowdown of in-tegration dynamics, decrease of effectiveness as well as decay of integration structures. In order to es-cape it, the EAEU should strive to increase its effectiveness on the basic of selecting valid integration model, working out straightforward integration strategy and proper usage of mechanisms of integration cooperation.

About the authors

A A Kinyakin

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.

Кинякин Андрей Алексеевич - доцент кафедры сравнительной политологии, ФГАОУ ВО «Российский университет дружбы народов», кандидат политических наук

Miklukho-Maklaya str., 10/2, Moscow, Russia, 117198


  1. Aver'yanov-Menskij K.V. Soyuznoe gosudarstvo Rossii i Belorussii ili evrazijskaya integraciya? Available from: (in Russ.).
  2. Analiz strategij integracionnogo sotrudnichestva (modelej realizacii integracionnogo potenciala) naibolee izvestnyh integracionnyh obrazovanij mira. Evrazijskaya ehkonomicheskaya komissiya. M., 2014 (in Russ).
  3. Gabuev A. Peresopryazhenie ot uspekhov // Vedomosti, 15.06.2015 (#4095). Available from: (in Russ).
  4. Dolgosrochnyj prognoz ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya Evrazijskogo ehkonomicheskogo soyuza do 2030 goda. Evrazijskaya ehkonomicheskaya komissiya. M., 2015. Available from: Documents/%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%80%D0%BE %D1%87%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9%20%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0% BD%D0%BE%D0%B7%20(%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%B0% D1%8F%20%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F).pdf (in Russ).
  5. Evrazijskaya ehkonomicheskaya integraciya — 2017. SPb.: CII EABR, 2017. Available from: (in Russ).
  6. Internet-portal SNG. Available from: (in Russ.).
  7. Suzdal'cev A. I. Smenit li Evrazijskij ehkonomicheskij soyuz Soyuznoe gosudarstvo Belorussii i Rossii? // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2013. № 8. S. 71—75. (in Russ).
  8. Vopros o vyhode Armenii iz EAEHS vynesut na zasedanie parlamenta // RIA «Novosti». 20.09.2017. Available from: (in Russ).
  9. Ziyadullaev N.S, Ziyadullaev U.S. 25 let SNG i evrazijskie integracionnye proekty: ozhidaniya, razocharovaniya i perspektivy. Ekonomicheskaya nauka Sovremennoj Rossii, 2017, № 2 (77) (in Russ).
  10. Arthur B. Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Path Dependence. Lock-in, and History 225 Events'. 99 Economic Journal. 1989. P. 116—131.
  11. Chou D., Shy O. Network Effects without Network Externalities. 8 International Journal of Industrial Organization. 1990. P. 259—270. [1 2 ] Dragneva-Lewers R., Wolczuk K. Trade and geopolitics: should the EU engage with the Eurasian Economic Union? European Policy Centre. Policy Brief. 2 April 2015. Available from:
  12. Falyahov R. Belorusy davyat vizami na gaz // 17.02.2017. URL: business/2017/02/16/10528313.shtml (in Russ).
  13. H ath away O. Path Dependence in the Law: The Course and Pattern of Legal Change in a Common Law System. John M. Olin Center for Studies in Law, Economics and Public Policy Working Papers. Paper 2003. P. 100—165.
  14. Hodgson G. Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Polity Press, Cambridge and University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1998.
  15. Kinyakin A. The Eurasian Economic Union: between co-existence, confrontation and cooperation with the EU // Rosznik Integracji Europejskiej. 2016. Vol. 10. P. 461—480.
  16. Liebowitz S., Margolis S. Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 1995. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 205—226.
  17. Mahoney J. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society. Vol. 29. No. 4. (Aug., 2000). P. 507—548.
  18. North D. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. 1996.
  19. Popescu N. Eurasian Economic Union: The Real, The Imaginary, The Likely. Chaillot Papers. EU Institute for Security Studues. September 2014.

Copyright (c) 2017 Kinyakin A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies