ON THE SUBJECT MATTER OF DIALECTIC IN ST. AUGUSTINE’S WORK

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Augustine’s idea of dialectic combines basic ancient traditions: Aristotelian, Stoic and Neoplatonic ones. But its subject-matter should be viewed not only empirically as a mixture of historical elements, but also properly philosophically, i.e. as dependent on its own concept. In the case of this logical approach every particular historical form of dialectic is a stage in the consciousness of its concept, so the elements of Augustine’s conception constitute a hierarchy. The highest level of this hierarchy is Neoplatonic, and on this stage the concept of dialectic in Augustine’s thought reaches its universally self-conscious, or absolute, form. And yet, although dialectic in Augustine’s work acquires the title of “true truth”, it is not posited as a concrete unity of subject and substance , which is its concept in itself. It will take fourteen centuries of development of thought to acknowledge the processuality of the thinking subject to be a background of the substantial realm of metaphysic, which will take place at the end of modernity in Hegel’s dialectic.

About the authors

A A Tashchian

Kuban State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: tashchian@gmail.com

кандидат философских наук, доцент, профессор кафедры философии Кубанского государственного университет

Stavropolskaya Str., 149, Krasnodar, Russia 350040

References

  1. Malatesta M. Dialectic. Augustine through the Ages: An Encyclopedia. Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge, U.K.: Eerdsmans; 1999. p. 269—271.
  2. Malatesta M. St. Augustine’s Dialectic from the Modern Logic Standpoint. Metalogicon. 1995;8(2):91—120.
  3. Pépin J. Saint Augustin et la Dialectique. Villanova: Villanova University Press; 1976.
  4. Brachtendorf J. The Decline of Dialectic in Augustine's Early Dialogues. Studia Patristica. 2001;37. Leuven: Peeters Press. p. 25—30.
  5. Heßbrüggen-Walter S. Augustine's Critique of Dialectic. Augustine and the Disciplines: From Cassiciacum to Confessions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 184—205.
  6. Topping R. Happiness and Wisdom: Augustine’s Early Theology of Education. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America; 2012.
  7. Uhle T. Augustin und die Dialektik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck; 2012.
  8. Marrou HI. Saint Augustin et la fin de la culture antique. Paris: De Boccard; 1983.
  9. Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina. Ac. J.-P. Migne. Parisiis. T. 32 [=PL 32], 1877.
  10. PL 43, 1845.
  11. PL 41, 1900.
  12. Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers in 2 vols. Vol. 2. London: W. Heinemann; NY: G.P. Putnam’s Sons; 1925.
  13. Aristotle. Posteria Analytics. Topica. London: W. Heinemann; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1960.
  14. Fischer B. De Augustini disciplinarium libro qui est de dialectica. Ienae Typis G. Nevenhanhi, 1912.
  15. Jackson B. Introduction. Augustine. De Dialectica. Dordrecht, Holland; Boston, USA: D. Reidel Publishing Company; 1975. p. 1—75.
  16. Bucher T. Zur formalen Logik bei Augustinus. Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie. 1982; 29(1—2):3—45.
  17. Epictetus. The Discourses as Reported by Arrian, the Manual, and Fragments in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: W. Heinemann; 1956.
  18. PL 34, 1887.
  19. Svensson M. Theorie und Praxis bei Augustin. Freiburg im Breisgau: Karl Alber; 2007.
  20. Sextus Empiricus in 4 vols. Vol. 2. London: W. Heinemann; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1967.
  21. Plotinus in 7 vols. Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1989.
  22. Schiaparelli A. Plotinus on dialectic. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 2009; 91(3): 253—287.
  23. Plotini opera omnia. Porphyrii. Liber de vita Plotini. Cum Marsilii Ficini commentariis et ejusdem interpretatione castigata. Vol. 1. Oxonii, e typographeo academico; 1835.
  24. Gilson E. Introduction à l'étude de Saint Augustin. Paris: J. Vrin; 1987.
  25. PL 42, 1841.

Copyright (c) 2018 Tashchian A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies