The Image of the Future through the Prism of the Scientific Views of J.A. Condorcet

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The research examines the views of J. A. Condorcet, one of the most prominent representatives of the galaxy of European enlighteners. The detailed development and substantiation by the French thinker of the idea of social progress, the main driving force of which is the human mind, still arouses research interest today, more than 230 years later. The current radical change in philosophical views on human improvement and human nature in general is associated with the spread of transhumanist ideas. Attempts to establish a new world order are accompanied by the development of an image of the “desired future” in the form of a social model of the transhumanist concept. Its popularization and the desire to move from the host of philosophical ideas to the practical sphere are facilitated, first of all, by reliance on a modern scientific and technological foundation, the increased capabilities of nano-, bio-, info- and cognitive sciences. The authors of the research focus on the question: are today’s ideas about human improvement a reconstruction of intentions based on the ideas of the 18th century enlighteners, taking into account the achievements of modern scientific and technological progress and transformed to meet the “demands of the time”? Or is the movement towards a bright future, the pursuit of happiness as the main goal of humanity seen by thinkers of the past and today’s transhumanists in completely different ways? The authors turn to the scientific heritage of J.A. Condorcet, containing ideas of progress that served as a certain guideline in the course of subsequent social transformations. The representative of the French Enlightenment saw the potential for human improvement in the development of intelligence, morality, science, art, literature, believing that the main guarantee of achieving success in this field is ensuring the availability of universal education. Condorcet sets a high standard for the future, an example of the proper attitude of the state to the education and upbringing of its citizens, not leaving aside the importance of such material driving forces of progress as the development of industry, agriculture, etc. The work emphasizes that, despite all the utopian views of the enlighteners, their ideas about the power of reason have not lost their significance today, since they represent strategic guidelines for the elevation of each person, his spiritual growth due to a decent education and upbringing, familiarization with new knowledge, the disclosure of creative abilities, i.e. through personal and cultural improvement.

About the authors

Ekaterina N. Gnatik

RUDN University

Author for correspondence.
Email: gnatik-en@rudn.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0745-5019
SPIN-code: 4104-2924

DSc in Philosophy, Professor, Professor of the Department of Ontology and Epistemology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

Olga V. Marchenkova

RUDN University

Email: olgalla@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 4731-9048
Postgraduate Student of the Department of Ontology and Epistemology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation

References

  1. Kant I. Answer to the question: what is Enlightenment? In: The works in 6 vol. Vol. 6. Moscow: Mysl’ publ.; 1966. (In Russian).
  2. Ogurtsov AP. Philosophy of Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Moscow; 1993. (In Russian).
  3. Ugleva AV. The Apology of the Human Mind by Nicolas de Condorcet: An Educated Society as the Foundation of a New Political Order. Philosophy. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2023;7(3):50–78. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2023-3-50-78
  4. Grinin LE. Theory, methodology and philosophy of history: essays on the development of historical thought from antiquity to the mid-19th century. Philosophy and Society. 2010;(4):145–197. (In Russian).
  5. Starodubtsev MP. The cult of reason, knowledge, and education – the most important value of the enlightenment. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013;9(137):291–296. (In Russian).
  6. Khrapov SA. Crisis of consciousness: ‘cognitive response’ technological civilization. Voprosy Filosofii. 2019;(l):88–95. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S004287440003623-0
  7. Beck U. Risk society: towards a new modernity. Moscow: Progress-Tradiciya publ.; 2000. (In Russian).
  8. Toffler A. The third wave. Moscow: ACT publ.; 2004. (In Russian).
  9. Castells M. The information age: economy, society and culture. Moscow: GU VShE publ.; 2000. (In Russian).
  10. Bell D. The coming post-industrial society. Experience of social forecasting. Moscow: Academia publ.; 2004. (In Russian).
  11. Nafikova AI. The problem of legal identity of the person in the context of globalization. Modern problems of science and education. 2015;(2–2). Available from: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=22306 (accessed: 13.08.2024). (In Russian).
  12. Gnatik EN, Liseev IK. The posthuman era as a transhumanistic image of the future. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2023;19(2):284–293. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.52180/1999-9836-2023.19.2.11.284-293
  13. Bostrom N. A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology. 2005;14(1):1–25.
  14. Ferrando F. Philosophical Posthumanism. Moscow: Dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki publ.; 2022. (In Russian).
  15. Pinker S. Enlightenment now: the case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. Moscow: Alpina non fiction publ.; 2021. (In Russian).
  16. Semenov YuS. Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas de Condorcet and his place in the history of the idea of human progress. In: Condorcet JA. Sketch of a historical picture of the progress of the human mind. Moscow: Publishing house of the State Public Historical Library of Russia publ.; 2010. (In Russian).
  17. Litvinova EF. Jean Antoine Condorcet (1743–1794). His life and scientific and political activity. Moscow: Direct-Media publ.; 2014. (In Russian).
  18. Condorcet JA. Sketch of a historical picture of the progress of the human mind. Moscow: Publishing house of the State Public Historical Library of Russia publ.; 2010. (In Russian).
  19. Gnatik EN, Marchenkova OV. Ideological origins of the project of human nature improvement in the philosophical heritage of F. Bacon and R. Descartes. Observatory of Culture. 2024;21(4):340–347. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25281/2072-3156-2024-21-4 340-347
  20. Gnatik EN. Convergent technologies and the prospects of humanity dehumanization.
  21. Gnatik EN. Digital transformation of socio-technological reality: problems and risks. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2024;28(1):168–180. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-1-168-180
  22. Gnatik EN. Militarization of artificial intelligence systems: opportunities and threats. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2024;28(3):771–784. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-3-771-784
  23. Dlugatsch TB. Joseph de Maistre, as an Enemy of Enlightenment. History of Philosophy. 2018;23(1):42–55. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2018-23-1-42-55
  24. Zholobova YuV, Schastlivceva EA. Philosophical content of transhumanism in the context of the crisis of human nature. Herald of Vyatka State University. 2019;2(132):14–22. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25730/VSU.7606.19.014

Copyright (c) 2025 Gnatik E.N., Marchenkova O.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies