Two Faces of Transcendental Empiricism: Gilles Deleuze and John McDowell
- Authors: Volkov D.A.1, Evstigneev M.D.1
-
Affiliations:
- National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
- Issue: Vol 28, No 4 (2024): EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY
- Pages: 1236-1251
- Section: ONTOLOGY AND GNOSEOLOGY
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/42168
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-4-1236-1251
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KRQPMQ
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The research presents a comparative analysis of John McDowell’s and Gilles Deleuze’s conceptions of transcendental empiricism. The very name of this conception bears in itself a kind of paradox, since Kant (the father of transcendental philosophy) occasionally used the term “transcendental” as “non-empirical”. The research presents an attempt to explain why these philosophers apply to themselves such self-description and how they understand it. To achieve this goal, we present an analysis of transcendental empiricism of each of the heroes of the study. An analysis of Deleuze’s view shows that he considers transcendental empiricism as a study of the validity of our experience. The main question of Deleuze’s transcendental philosophy is Kant’s quid juris? We also show that Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism is a self-conscious attempt to develop post-Kantian and phenomenological traditions in modern philosophy that stands in sharp opposition to any form of Hegelianism. McDowell, contrary to that, is more sympathetic to Hegel. His transcendental empiricism has another roots from that of Deleuze. It is motivated by Sellar’s critique of “the Myth of the Given” and McDowell’s attack on the “third dogma of empiricism”. These projects show the inconsistency of traditional empiricism. However, according to McDowell, they do not show the impossibility of non-traditional, transcendental empiricism that is concerned with the question of the very possibility of empirical worldview. The comparative analysis of McDowell’s and Deleuze’s projects show, despite the difference of philosophical tradition and style, close affinity between some moves of these philosophers. However, it also reveals some important differences. While McDowell is seeking to show how the concepts can be actualized in intuitions, the main concern of Deleuze is to show how intuition can develop itself into conceptual form
About the authors
Danila A. Volkov
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Author for correspondence.
Email: davolkov@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-7088-5422
SPIN-code: 3401-0304
Doctoral Student of Doctoral School of Philosophy, Research Assistant of HUM of Transcendental Philosophy
20 Myasnitskaya St., 101000, Moscow, Russian FederationMaksim D. Evstigneev
National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Email: mevstigneev@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1391-4517
SPIN-code: 6194-8555
Doctoral Student of Doctoral School of Philosophy, Research Assistant of International Laboratory for Logic, Linguistics and Formal Philosophy
20 Myasnitskaya St., 101000, Moscow, Russian FederationReferences
- Hughes J. Deleuze and the Genesis of Representation. London: Continuum; 2008.
- Husserl E. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenologica Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Mikhailov AV, transl. Moscow: Academic Project; 2021. (In Russian).
- Deleuze G. Deux Régimes de Fous. Textes et entretiens 1975-1995. Sous la dir. de Lapoujade D. Les Edition de Minuit; 2003.
- Deleuze G. Différence et Répétition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1968.
- Lapoujade D. Deleuze, les mouvements aberrants. Les Éditions de Minuit; 2014.
- Smith DW. Essays on Deleuze. Edinburgh University Press; 2012.
- Deleuze G. Empirisme et subjectivité. Essai sur la nature humaine selon Hume. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1953.
- Hume D. A Treatise of Human Nature. In: Works in 2 vols. Narsky IS, editor. Tsereteli SI, transl. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Moscow: Mysl’ publ.; 1996. P. 53-656. (In Russian).
- Husserl E. Cartesian Meditations. Molchanov VI, transl. Moscow: Academic Project; 2010. (In Russian).
- Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason. 2nd edition (B). In: Works in German and Russian. Motroshilova NV, Tuschling B, editors. Vol. II. 1. Moscow: Nauka publ.; 2006. (In Russian).
- Ricœur P. Étude sur les « Méditations Cartésiennes » de Husserl. Revue Philosophique de Louvain. 1954;(52):75-109.
- Deleuze G. L’Ile déserte. Les Éditions de Minuit; 2002.
- Deleuze G. Nietzsche et la Philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1962.
- Schelling FWJ. On the History of Modern Philosophy (Munich Lectures). In: Works in 2 vols. Vol. 2. Gulyga AV, editor. Levina MI, Mikhailov AV, transl. Moscow: Mysl’ publ.; 1989. (In Russian).
- McDowell J. Mind and World. With a New Introduction. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1966.
- Schelling FWJ. Philosophy of Revelation. Pestov AL, transl. Saint Petersburg: Umozrenie publ.; 2020. (In Russian).
- Deleuze G. Logique du Sens. Les Éditions de Minuit; 1969.
- Zourabichvili F. Le vocabulaire de Deleuze. Paris: Edition Ellipses; 2003.
- Deleuze G, Guattari F. Qu’est-ce que la philosophie ? Les Éditions de Minuit; 2005.
- McDowell J. Experiencing the World. In: Willaschek M, editor. John McDowell. Reason and Nature. Lecture and Colloquium in Münster 1999. LIT - Verlag Münster; 2009. P. 3-18.
- McDowell J. Conceptual Capacities in Perception. In: Having the World in View. Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press; 2009. P. 127-144.
- McDowell J. Why Is Sellars’s Essay Called “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”? In: deVries W, editor. Empiricism, Perceptual Knowldge, Normativity, and Realism. Essays on Wilfried Sellars. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. P. 9-32.
- Lewis CI. Mind and the World-Order. Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Dover Publications; 1929.
- Sellars W. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Makeeva LB, editor. Rogonyan GS, transl. Rorty R, intro. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of the European University at St. Petersburg; 2021. (In Russian).
- Davidson D. On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme. In: Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1984. P. 183-198.
- Sellars W. Language, Rules and Behavior. In: Hooks S, editor. John Dewey. Philosohper of Science and Freedom. New York: The Dial Press; 1949. P. 289-315.
- Davidson D. Epistemology Externalized. In: Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2001. P. 193-204.
- Davidson D. A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge. In: Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2001. P. 137-158.
- Rorty R. Pragmatism, Davidson and truth. In: Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. P. 126-150.
- McDowell J. Sellars on Perceptual Experience. In: Having the World in View. Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press; 2009. P. 3-23.
- McDowell J. The Logical Form of Intuition. In: Having the World in View. Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press; 2009. P. 23-43.
- McDowell J. Avoiding the Myth of the Given. In: Lindgaard J, editor. John McDowell. Experience, Norm, and Nature. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2008. P. 1-14.
- McDowell J. Scheme-Content Dualism and Empiricism. In: Hahn LE, editor. The Philosophy of Donald Davidson. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court; 1999. P. 87-104.
- McDowell J. Sensory Consciousness in Kant and Sellars. In: Having the World in View. Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press; 2009. P. 108-126.
- Boyle M. The Rational Role of Perceptual Content. In: Boyle M, Mylonaki E, edit. Reason in Nature. New Essays on Themes from John McDowell. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 2022. P. 83-110.
- McDowell J. Sellars’s Transcendental Empiricism. In: Nida-Rümelin J, editor. Rationalität, Realismus, Revision. Vorträge des 3. internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie vom 15. bis zum 18. September 1997 in München. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter; 2000. S. 42-51.
- McDowell J. Perceptual Experience and Empirical Rationality. Analytic Philosophy. 2018. P. 89-98.
- Millikan RG. Language, Thought, and other biological Categories. New York: MIT Press; 1984.
- McDowell J. The Content of Perceptual Experience. The Philosophical Quarterly. 1994;(44):190-205.
- Stroud B. Sense-experience and the grounding of thought. In: Reading McDowell. On Mind and World. Smith NH, editor. New York: Routledge; 2002. P. 79-91.
- Pippin RB. Leaving nature behind. ot two cheers for “subjectivism”. In: Smith NH, editor. Reading McDowell. On Mind and World. New York: Routledge; 2002. P. 79-91.
- Leirfall A. Transcendental or epistemological? McDowell’s justification of empirical knowledge. In: Malpas J, editor. From Kant to Davidson. Philosophy and the idea of the transcendental. New York: Routledge; 2003.
- Sellars W. Science and Metaphysics. Variations on Kantian Themes. Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1968.
- Kant I. Critique of the Power of Judgment. In: Collected Works in eight volumes. Vol. 5. Gulyga AV, editor. Levina M, transl. Moscow: Choro; 1994. (In Russian).
- Deleuze G. La Philosophie critique de Kant. Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France; 2004.
