Theories and Practices of Societal Security in the Scandinavian Countries: A Comparative Analysis

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The research attempts to conduct a comparative analysis of conceptual representations of societal security, its functions and practices in Scandinavian countries after the Cold War, when traditional security strategies focusing on geopolitics, specific war-related threats, and territorial defense are overlaid with new understandings of “threats” and the necessary range of state actions to address them. Strategies of ‘resilience’, risk management’, ‘crisis’ or ‘emergency management’ become important. In the Nordic countries, the need for societal security is coming to the fore, linked to the development of a social welfare society. The similarities in the theory and practice of societal security allow us to speak about the possible existence of own, Scandinavian system of societal/complex security. Our investigation shows that the Scandinavian way of ensuring security was formed on the basis of the “Scandinavian model”, founded on socialization and integration, and the basis of the new socio-philosophical understanding of security was readiness for broad actions: from military invasion to environmental threats, man-made disasters and terrorist attacks. However, a generally accepted interpretation of societal security among the Scandinavian countries has not yet developed; each country has its own peculiarities. However, differences are as common as similarities. Although there are undoubtedly special, Scandinavian values and ways to protect them. Identification of these peculiarities is the purpose of the presented study, which attempts to answer the question whether it is possible to speak about the existence of a special, “Scandinavian way” of conceptualizing and ensuring security. For this purpose, it is necessary to conduct a comparative analysis of security concepts, their formulation, and, most importantly, practical actions to ensure societal security in the states of the Scandinavian Peninsula on the example of Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland.

About the authors

Mikhail S. Topchiev

Astrakhan Tatishchev State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: mstopchiev@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8296-6631
SPIN-code: 4763-1579

Candidate of Political Sciences, Leading Researcher at the Center for Studying the Problems of Complex Security of the Caspian Macroregion and Countering Terrorism and Extremism

20A Tatishcheva St., Astrakhan, 414056, Russian Federation

References

  1. Chudinov SI. The problem of differentiation and mutual determination of various levels of security. Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice. 2015;12(62):191-195. (In Russian).
  2. Rastoltsev SV. Scandinavian specificity in international development assistance. Modern Europe. 2019;(5):176-184. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope520195362
  3. Larsson S, Rhinard M. Nordic Societal Security: Convergence and Divergence. Paris, London and New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2021.
  4. Blossing U, Imsen G, Moos L. The Nordic Education Model ‘A School for All’ Encounters Neo-Liberal Policy. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014.
  5. Lundin P, Stenlås N. Technology, State Initiative and National Myths in Cold War Sweden: An Introduction. Science for Welfare and Warfare: Technology and State Initiative in Cold War Sweden. Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications; 2010. P. 1-34.
  6. Mead RW. The Return of Geopolitics: The Revenge of the Revisionist Powers. Foreign Affairs. 2014;93(3):65-78.
  7. Hovden J. Public Policy and Administration in a Vulnerable Society: Regulatory Reforms Initiated by a Norwegian Commission. Journal of Risk Research. 2004;7(6):629-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987042000192228
  8. Sundelius B. A Brief on Embedded Societal Security. Information & Security. 2005;17:23-40.
  9. Konyshev V, Sergunin A. Strany Severnoj Evropy: budet li obshchaya arkticheskaya strategiya? Sovremennaya Evropa. 2012;(2):35-43. (In Russian).
  10. Sundelius B. Samhällssäkerhet i det globalt invävda Norden. Nordisk Tidsskrift. 2007;83(1):21-28.
  11. Larsson S. A First Line of Defence? Vigilant Surveillance, Participatory Policing and the Reporting of “Suspicious” Activity. Surveillance & Society. 2017;15(1):94-107.
  12. Romanova AP. The concept of societal security: theory, discussion and Caspian perspectives. Caspium Securitatis: Caspian Security Journal. 2021;2(1):55-65. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21672/2713-024X-2021-1-1-055-065
  13. Larsson ОS. In the Name of Society: The Branding of Swedish Civil Security Technologiesand Their Exclusionary Effects: dissertation. Thesis (Ph.D.). London: King’s College (University of London); 2019.

Copyright (c) 2024 Topchiev M.S.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies