Experimental Philosophy and Cognitive Science in the Context of Comprehending Hybrid Intelligence: Philosophical and Anthropological Aspect
- Authors: Bokov G.E.1, Chapny H.V.2
-
Affiliations:
- Saint Petersburg State University
- Southern Federal University
- Issue: Vol 28, No 4 (2024): EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY
- Pages: 1067-1085
- Section: EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/42157
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-4-1067-1085
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JWNVCC
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The research considers experimental philosophy as a new philosophical movement. It emerged in Western intellectual thought in the 21st century against the background of the methodological crisis of analytic philosophy. Its representatives justify that the philosopher himself should actively master experimental methods of psychology and social sciences. They are opposing themselves to the so-called “cabinet” speculative philosophy. The main topic of their research is the “philosophical intuition” of ordinary consciousness. They also focus on the project of metaphilosophy. This movement has quite a few critics. They fear that if philosophy integrates with science it will lose its autonomy. Today one of the most promising interdisciplinary scientific fields is cognitive science, which actively uses experimental data. The research exploring the possibilities of dialogue between philosophy and cognitive science on a variety of issues, primarily on the question of consciousness and human cognitive activity. The research proves that by experimental philosophy we can mean a philosophy that is open to making sense of new data obtained experimentally. It retains its autonomy not being fully integrated into science but actively participates in scientific development, as well as acts as an ethical regulator of scientific and technological progress. We propose the interdisciplinary study of hybrid intelligence as one of the promising directions for the development of experimental philosophy. We reveal the main features of creating hybrid intelligent systems at the present stage. On the example of group collaboration of professionals of natural science and socio-humanities profile of the laboratory “Neurointerfaces” operating on the basis of the Research Center of neurotechnology of the Southern Federal University we demonstrate the feasibility of conducting research in experimental philosophy to study hybrid intelligence. The study emphasizes the importance and significance of bioethics and ethical regulation in the modern scientific and experimental field.
About the authors
German E. Bokov
Saint Petersburg State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: bokovg@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0456-2356
SPIN-code: 3934-2396
PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy of Religion and Religious Studies, Institute of Philosophy
7/9 Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, Saint Petersburg, Russian FederationHelen V. Chapny
Southern Federal University
Email: elena_chapny@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-8386-0607
SPIN-code: 1557-8962
PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Social Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy and Social-Political Sciences
105 Bolshaya Sadovaya St., Rostov-on-Don, Russian FederationReferences
- Stepin VS. Philosophical Anthropology and Philosophy of Culture. Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt publ.; 2020. (In Russian).
- Dubrovsky DI. Human Nature, Anthropological Crisis and Cybernetic Immortality. In: Dubrovsky DI, editor. Global Future 2045. Converging Technologies (NBICS) and Transhumanistic Evolution. Moscow: MBA publ.; 2013. P. 237–252. (In Russian).
- Timoshenko TV, Skripnik KD. Experimental Philosophy: the Problem of Intuition. South Pole. Studies in the History of Modern Western Philosophy. 2020;6(1–2):27–40. (In Russian).
- Knobe J, Nichols JS, editors. Experimental Philosophy. Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press; 2014.
- Grundmann T, Horvath J, editors. Experimental Philosophy and Its Critics. London: Routledge; 2012.
- Alexander J. Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity; 2012.
- Nado J. Experimental Philosophy 2.0. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy. 2016;5(3):159–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.206
- Drozdova DN. Experimental Philosophy 2.0: New Wine in Old Bottles? In: Shiyan T, editor. Philosophy and Science: Problems of Correlation. Aljoshinskie chtenija – 2016. Proceedings of the International Conference. Moscow, December 7–9, 2016. Moscow: RSUH publ.; 2016. P. 73–78. (In Russian).
- Williamson T. Doing Philosophy: From Common Curiosity to Logical Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press; 2018.
- Vasilyev VV. Metaphilosophy: History and Perspectives. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2019;56(2):6–18. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201956222
- Timoshenko TV. Background of the Appearance and Development of Experimental Philosophy. Bulletin of Higher Educational Institutions. North Caucasus Region. Social Science. 2020;(3):23–26. (In Russian).
- Suvorov AV. Experimental Philosophy: Collection of Articles. Moscow: URAO publ.; 1998. (In Russian).
- Jackendoff R. Semantics and Cognition. 6th ed. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press; 1993.
- Chernighovskaya TV. Cheshire Smile of Schrödinger’s Cat: Language and Mind. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury publ.; 1998. (In Russian).
- Opolev P. Naturalistic Turn in Modern Philosophy: Philosophy and Neuroscience. Ideas and Ideals. 2023;15(2 pt.1):49–71. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2023-15.2.1-49-71
- Lektorsky VA. Philosophy Facing Cognitive Studies. Voprosy Filosofii. 2021;(10):5–17. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2021-10-5-17
- Sushhin MA. What Can Philosophy and Cognitive Sciences Give Each Other? Philosophical Thought. 2023;(10):40–48. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2023.10.68745
- Vasilyev VV. Philosophy and Cognitive Science: Options for Dialogue. Voprosy Filosofii. 2022;(9):59–66. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-9-59-66
- Bezlepkin EA, Zaykova AS. Neurophilosophy, Philosophy of Neuroscience, and Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence: The Problem of Distinguishing. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2021;64(1):71–87. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-1-71-87
- Arshinov VI. Converging Technologies in the Context of Postnonclassical Paradigm. Slozhnost’. Razum. Postneklassika. 2015;(3):42–54. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.12737/13564
- Dubrovsky DI. The Problem of “Consciousness and Brain”: Theoretical and Methodological Issues (In Connection with the Tasks of NBICS–convergence). In: Dubrovsky DI, editor. Global Future 2045. Converging Technologies (NBICS) and Transhumanistic Evolution. Moscow: MBA publ.; 2013. P. 121–149. (In Russian).
- Doletskiy AN, Guzenko DS. Brain–Computer Interface: Current Stage of Development and Perspectives. Volgograd Journal of Medical Research. 2017;(2):15–20. (In Russian).
- Oliveira A. The Digital Mind. How Science is Redefining Humanity. Chistopolskaya K, transl. Moscow: Izdat. dom “Delo” RANEPA publ.; 2022. (In Russian).
- Kiroy VN, editor. Neurotechnologies: Neuro-Biofeedback and Brain-Computer Interface. Rostov-on-Don: Southern Federal Univ. Press; 2011. (In Russian).
- Kiroy VN. Brain-Computer Interface (History, Current State, Prospects). Rostov-on-Don: Southern Federal Univ. Press; 2011. (In Russian).
- Bokov GE, Chapny HV, Shaposhnikov PD. Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) and Brain-to-Brain Interface (BBI) in the Structure of NBIC-Technologies (Based on Experimental Data from the Research Center of Neurotechnologies, South Federal University). Philosophy of Science and Technology. 2024;29(1):34–47. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2024-29-1-34-47
- Shherban’ IV, Kirilenko NE, Shherban’ OG, Shaposhnkov DG, Kiroj VN. Methods of Searching for Structural Features of the EEG for a Stimulus-Independent Model of the Brain–Computer Interface. Rostov-on-Don: Southern Federal Univ. Press; 2022. (In Russian).