Philosophy, Governance and Law in the System of Social Action: Moral and Instrumental Problems of Genetic Research

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The research analyzes the process of formation of the ethics committee as a new institution in the system of regulation of genetic research. The external factors of this process are the increasing digitalization of medical and research practices, as well as the special situation that is developing in the field of genomic research and the use of genetic technologies, where issues of philosophy, jurisprudence and administration have generated many fundamentally new, and sometimes unexpected contexts. The author shows the similarity and difference of approaches to the inclusion of the ethics committee in the national regulatory systems of different countries and determines the prospects for further integration of the new institution into normative and administrative-regulatory and law enforcement practices. The research applies all the main methods of system analysis and structural and functional analysis, as well as the comparative legal method. At the stage of generalization of empirical material, the author turns to the means and methods of philosophical phenomenology and phenomenological sociology. The study revealed that the ethics committee may have different institutional and regulatory functions in a variety of management and legal systems. Being hybrid in nature, the ethics committee performs various functions, and in various state legal systems and traditions it can combine elements of legislative, executive and judicial power. At times, the ethics committee may go beyond the scope of both a purely administrative and exclusively legal regulator. All this indicates that the integration of this institution into the legal system and into a variety of social practices is far from being completed.

About the authors

Vladimir I. Przhilenskiy

Kutafin Moscow State Law University

Author for correspondence.
Email: viprzhilenskij@msal.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5942-3732

DSc in Philosophy, Professor

9-1 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya St., 123242, Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Grebenshchikova EG, Tischenko PD. Digitized future of medicine: challenges for bioethics. Philosophical Sciences. 2020;(2):83—103. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-2-83-103
  2. Lectorsky VA, Pruzhinin BI, Alexeeva IY, Arshinov VI, Gorokhov VG, Dubrovsky DI, Kiyashchenko LP, Tischenko PD. Convergence of biological, information, nano- and cognitive technologies: challenges of philosophy (material of the round table). Voprosy philosophii. 2012;(12):3—23. (In Russian).
  3. Dyson F. “Our Biotech Future”. The New York Review of Books 54. 2007;(12):4—8.
  4. Nowotny H, Testa G. Naked genes: rethinking the human in the molecular age. L.: MIT Press; 2010.
  5. Przhilenskiy VI. Legal and ethical expertise in the sphere of genetic research: problems of regulation and institutionalization. Medical Ethics. 2022;10(2):13—16. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24075/medet.2022.043
  6. Tishchenko PD, Yudin BG. Bioethics and journalism. Moscow: Publishing house “Adamant”; 2011. (In Russian).
  7. Yudin BG. Ethical committees in Russia: problems of their organization, status and functioning. Available from: https://www.msu.ru/bioetika/doc/sec/judin.doc (accessed: 03.06.2023). (In Russian).
  8. Hartlev M. Genomic Databases and Biobanks in Denmark. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43(4):743—753.
  9. Zakharova MV. Conversations about Hard and Soft Lex Bioetica in the Context of Grand Challenges of the External Environment. Kutafin Law Review. 2022;9(1):139—155. https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2022.1.19.139-155
  10. Lalova T, Negrouk A, Dollé L, Bekaert S, Debucquoy A, Derèze J-J, Valcke P, Kindt EJ, Huys I. An Overview of Belgian Legislation Applicable to Biobank Research and Its Interplay with Data Protection Rules. In: GDPR and Biobanking Individual Rights, Public Interest and Research Regulation across Europe. Slokenberga S, Tzortzatou O, Reichel J, editors. In: Law, Governance and Technology. Series 43. 2021. P. 187—215.
  11. Berdyaev NA. The Kingdom of the Spirit and the Kingdom of Caesar. Moscow: Amrita Rus publ.; 2020. (In Russian).
  12. Salter B, Salter C. Bioethics and the Global Moral Economy: The Cultural Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Science. Science, Technology and Human Values 32. 2007;(5):554—581.

Copyright (c) 2024 Przhilenskiy V.I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies