The Image of C.S. Peirce in Russian Philosophy: From the History of the Creation of the “Canon” of American Philosophers

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The study presents the Russian historical-philosophical process in the context of the discovery of a new object, themes, personae, set of reactions and formation of a product for the intellectual community. The author's reliance on philosophical empirical material and appropriate hermeneutics in its processing allows the author to highlight those factors that influenced individual and collective reception. The author sees as a convenient case study the “discovery” by the Russian philosophical community of the early 20th century of both American philosophy in general and C.S. Peirce in particular. Since the beginning of the 19th century, Russian thinkers have turned their attention to American philosophy in all the diversity of its manifestations. Russian intellectuals paid special attention to American pragmatism and everything associated with it. In Russia, in addition to translations, numerous reviews of foreign publications on this topic are appearing. Of particular interest to us in the Russian “collective reflection” of American ideas is the system of preferences for ideas, texts, events, and names. The point is that what might have been a priority for a European thinker, for a Russian one turned out to be on the “periphery” of his consciousness, as well as vice versa. While James appeared among the priority figures for Russian thinkers, Peirce was in his “shadow”. Using rich empirical material, the author shows all the stages of Peirce’s image formation in the Russian intellectual community. The research shows that “image” of Peirce, which represents not so much the thinker himself, but characterizes the intellectual community that turned to him. The results of the study may be useful both for contemporary foreign and Russian interpreters of Peirce and for historians of philosophy who are rethinking the past and forming in the present new objects of reception and reflection.

About the authors

Vasily V. Vanchugov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: vanchugov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2674-6578

DSc in Philosophy, Professor, Department of History of Russian Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy

27/4, Lomonosovskiy av., 119991, Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Grott NYa, Lange NN. Revue philosophique de la France et de l'etranger. Questions of Philosophy and Psychology. Book 2. Мoscow; 1890.
  2. Grott NYa. The principles of psychology. Questions of Philosophy and Psychology. Book 5. Мoscow; 1890.
  3. Mokievsky PV. Mind, a quarterly review of psychology and philosophy. № 57, January 1890. Questions of philosophy and psychology. Book 3. Мoscow; 1890. P. 70—72.
  4. Basistov PA. The Monist. Vol. 7, 1897, № 1—3. Questions of Philosophy and Psychology. Book. 38. Мoscow; 1897.
  5. Mokievsky PV. N.K. Mikhailovsky and Western Science. Russian wealth. 1904;(3).
  6. Mokievsky PV. I.M. Sechenov. Russian wealth. 1905;(10).
  7. Vasiliev NA. The Third International Philosophical Congress in Heidelberg. Journal of the Ministry of National Education. 1909;(2).
  8. Chelpanov G. The Second International Philosophical Congress in Geneva. Questions of philosophy and psychology. Book 74. Мoscow; 1904.
  9. Vasiliev NA. The Third International Philosophical Congress in Heidelberg. Journal of the Ministry of National Education. 1909;(2).
  10. Lazarev A. Pragmatism. A new current in the field of philosophy. Russian thought. Мoscow; 1909.
  11. Balaban A. Pragmatism. Questions of philosophy and psychology. 1909;(4).
  12. Glagolev CS. A new type of philosophy. (Pragmatism or meliorism). Theological Herald. 1909;(XVIII).
  13. Strakhov PS. Pragmatism in Science and Religion (regarding the book by W. Jems: “The Variety of Religious Experience”). Theological Herald. 1910;(XIX).
  14. Frank SL. Pragmatism as a philosophical doctrine. Russian Thought. 1910;(5).
  15. Yushkevich P. On Pragmatism. In: James W. Pragmatism: A new name for some old methods of thinking. Popular Lectures on Philosophy. Yushkevich P, transl. Saint Petersburg: Shipovnik publ.; 1910.
  16. Marcel H. Pragmatism, a study of its various forms: Anglo-American, French, Italian and its religious significance. Saint Petersburg: JSC "Slovo" publ.; 1911.
  17. Ern VF. Reflections on Pragmatism. In: Struggle for Logos: Philosophical and Critical Experiments. Moscow: "Put" publ.; 1911.
  18. Berman YaA. The Essence of Pragmatism: New Currents in the Science of Thinking. Moscow: Zlatotsvet; 1911.
  19. Mokievsky P. Pragmatism in Philosophy. Russkoe Bogatstvo. 1910;(5):43—46.
  20. Stepun F. Former and Unfulfilled. Moscow, Saint Petersburg; 1995.
  21. Yakovenko B. Modern American Philosophy. Review. Logos. Book 3—4. 1913.
  22. Yakovenko B. On the essence of pragmatism (pro et contra). Works and days. 1912;(2).
  23. Yakovenko B. Modern American Philosophy. Review. Logos. Book 3/4. 1913.
  24. Yakovenko B. Royce's Ontology and its religious aspiration. Questions of Philosophy and Psychology. 1916;135(XXVII).
  25. Muravyev VN. From archival notes. In: N.F. Fedorov: pro et contra: in 2 vols. Book 2. Saint Petersburg: RCHGA publ.; 2008.

Copyright (c) 2024 Vanchugov V.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies