What is the Philosophy We Need?
- Authors: Kolychev P.M.1, Losev K.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation
- Issue: Vol 27, No 4 (2023): PHILOSOPHY OF CONSCIOUSNESS AND NEUROSCIENCE
- Pages: 1021-1032
- Section: SCHOLARLY LIFE
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/37151
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2023-27-4-1021-1032
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TYVAKX
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The study provides an overview of the discussion “What is the philosophy we need?”, that took place in the frames of “Modern Ontology - XI: Ontology and Religion” International Scientific and Practical Conference. The discussion spread around three main areas of philosophy teaching: philosophy as the history of philosophy, philosophy as the basis for the worldview, and philosophy as a system-categorical knowledge about the world as a whole. Supporters of the first position demonstrated the content diversity of philosophy, often emphasizing the teacher’s right to choose historical and philosophical material, this position caused criticism from other conference participants, whose main argument was the erosion of the philosophy content. Regarding the second position in the frames of discussion, its participants either denied the involvement of philosophy in the worldview formation, or believed that philosophy is the basis for the worldview, and the task of philosophy, in particular, is to form the worldview of students. As arguments, supporters of this approach cited the need for the philosophy in the transformation of modern spiritual life in Russia. This approach was in harmony with the position of the discussion participants, who advocated a system-categorical approach in philosophy teaching. This approach supposed the combination of abstract section (Ontology) with a specific section, where it would be necessary to consider the three following sections of philosophy: 1 - philosophy of nature, 2 - philosophy of socio-anthropological reality, 3 - philosophy of religion. At the same time, the supporters of this approach suggested using the substantive part of Soviet philosophy as a basis, which needs to be transformed taking into account the achievements of modern knowledge.
About the authors
Petr M. Kolychev
Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation
Author for correspondence.
Email: piter55spb@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7425-0833
DSc in Philosophy, Professor
67 Bolshaya Morskaya St., 190000, Saint Petersburg, Russian FederationKonstantin V. Losev
Saint-Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation
Email: losev.guap@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8733-5118
DSc in Economic, Professor
67 Bolshaya Morskaya St., 190000, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation