The Influence of Neurosciences on Understanding the Bodily Conditioning of Cognitive Processes: a Socio-Anthropological Aspect

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The study presents a conceptual analysis of the main approaches to the study of the human brain and consciousness from the standpoint of modern domestic and foreign neuroscience. Relevant interpretations of such problematic issues and concepts as “the boundary of the human body”, “embodied knowledge”, “general artificial intelligence”, “self”, etc. From the standpoint of a body-oriented approach, the problem of co-evolution of the body, consciousness, technology and social environment is considered. The idea of the body as an artifact is updated in the context of technological change in human nature, which entails the elimination of the living human body. On the example of the Homeric epic, it is shown that attempts to overcome vulnerability demonstrate one of the fundamental human needs. The realization of the need to expand and push the boundaries of the body in the anthropotechnological environment is presented in the form of a cyborg. It is suggested that, in terms of content, the idea of the “embodied mind”, as well as the project of creating a Hybrid reality and pan-communication, stem from the immanent human need for bodily involvement in the surrounding world. The features of the creation of Artificial Intelligence and Artificial General Intelligence at the present stage are revealed. The expediency of studying the results of neuroscientific comprehension of the organization of mental processes, first of all, in the field of visualization of brain processes and the mapping method, is noted. The main modern projects for the study of the brain, as well as the most effective methods for obtaining data on brain structures, are considered. The actual results of the research are described in such areas of neuroscience as: the study of mirror neurons and their systems; “reading the brain”, the study of neural correlates of consciousness. The results of studies of representatives of domestic neuroscience are presented. The human “I” is considered as a unique structure of the Ego-system of the brain (“self”). In conclusion, a conclusion is made about the significant influence of modern neuroscience on understanding the features of the functioning of the human brain, consciousness and cognitive processes; the effectiveness of applying the body-oriented approach to comprehending the integrity of “body-consciousness-technologies-social environment” is revealed.

About the authors

Ηelen V. Chapny

South Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: elena_chapny@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-8386-0607

PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor, Department of Social Philosophy

105 B. Sadovaya St., 344004, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation

References

  1. Maturana U, Varela F. The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Moscow; 2001. (In Russian).
  2. Ramachandran V. The brain tells. What makes us human. Moscow: Kar'era-Press publ.; 2015. (In Russian).
  3. Edelman G. The remembered present: a biological theory of consciousness. New York: Basic Books; 1989.
  4. Damasio А. Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. Jushhenko I, transl. Moscow: Kar'era-Press publ.; 2018. (In Russian).
  5. Frit K. Brain and soul. How nervous activity shapes our inner world. Petrova P, transl. Moscow: Astrel' publ.; 2010. (In Russian).
  6. Knjazeva EN. Enactivism: a Conceptual turn in Epistemology. Voprosy filosofii. 2013;(10):91—104. (In Russian).
  7. Podoroga V. The phenomenology of the body. Introduction to Philosophical Anthropology. Moscow: Ad Marginem; 1995. (In Russian).
  8. Beskova IA. Nature and images of corporeality. Moscow: Progress-Tradicija; 2011. (In Russian).
  9. Beskova IA. Physicality as an epistemological phenomenon. Moscow: IFRAN publ.; 2009. (In Russian).
  10. Popova OV. The body as the territory of technology: from social engineering to the ethics of biotechnological design. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI «Reabilitacija» publ.; 2021. (In Russian).
  11. Judin BG. The Creation of the Transhuman. Vestnik rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2007;(6). (In Russian).
  12. Chapny EV. Bodily conditioning of mental processes: philosophical and anthropological aspect: Abstract of the diss.. candidate of Philosophical Sciences: 09.00.13. Rostov-on-Don; 2016. (In Russian).
  13. Gomer. Iliada. Odisseja. Gnedicha N, Zhukovskogo V, transl. Moscow: Jeksmo publ.; 2005. (In Russian).
  14. Gavrilenko V. Homer’s Body: Towards the Genealogy of the Concept. Logos. 2011;(4). (In Russian).
  15. Cheklecov V. Hybrid reality. NBICS as a human-machine interface. In: Convergent technologies (NBICS) and transhumanistic evolution. Dubrovskii DI, editor. Moscow: MBA publ.; 2013. (In Russian).
  16. Jepshtejn MN. From knowledge to creativity. How the humanities can change the world. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives publ.; 2016. (In Russian).
  17. Johnson Μ. What Makes a Body? Rediscovering the Body. Journal of Speculative Philosophy. 2008;22(3):159—169. https://doi.org/10.2307/jspecphil.22.3.0159
  18. Stepin VS. A turning point in civilizational development. Points of growth of new values. In: Convergent technologies (NBICS) and transhumanistic evolution. Dubrovskii DI, editor. Moscow: MBA publ.; 2013. (In Russian).
  19. Vedjahin A. Strong artificial intelligence: on the approaches to superintelligence. Moscow: Intellectual literature publ.; 2021. (In Russian).
  20. Dubrovskii DI. The importance of neural consciousness research for the development of general artificial intelligence (methodological issues). Voprosy filosofii. 2022;(2):83—93. (In Russian).
  21. Hawrylycz M, Ed S. Lein, Angela L, et al; An Anatomically Comprehensive Atlas of the Adult Human Brain Transcriptome. Nature. 2012.489(7416):391—399.
  22. Olivejra A. Digital intelligence. How science is changing humanity. Chistopol'skaya K, transl. Moscow: Delo publ.; 2022. (In Russian).
  23. Riccolatti D, Sinigal'ja K. Mirrors in the brain. About the mechanisms of joint action and empathy. Kurakova OA, transl. Moscow: Languages of Slavic cultures publ.; 2012. (In Russian).
  24. Anohin KV. Cognitive computing based on neural hyper networks. In: Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Lektorskii VA, Dubrovskii DI, editors. Moscow: IIntell publ.; 2017. P. 70—86. (In Russian).
  25. Anohin KV. Cognitom: in search of a fundamental neuroscientific theory of consciousness. Journal of Higher Nervous Activity. 2021;71(1):39—71. (In Russian).
  26. Sergin VJa, Sergin AV. Hierarchical model of perception without combinatorial explosion. Journal of Higher Nervous Activity. 2019;69(5):633—658. (In Russian).
  27. Damasio A. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. Harcourt publ.; 2003.

Copyright (c) 2023 Chapny Η.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies