Ludwig Heinrich von Jakob and His Treatise

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The treatise of the German philosopher Ludwig Heinrich von Jakob (1759-1827), Examination of Mendelssohn’s Morning Hours, or All Speculative Proofs for the Existence of God provides researchers with a good excuse to address captivating subjects related to issues of biographical and historical-philosophical dimension. Of particular interest in this context is the introductory article by I. Kant, which he sent to L.H. von Jakob before the publication of the treatise. The central idea of Jacob’s treatise was to defend Kant’s critical philosophy against the also critical M. Mendelssohn’s position. In the treatise, von Jakob sought to defend Kant’s concept against Mendelssohn’s similar methodological attitude of criticality in his treatment of philosophy. On this basis, Jacob’s treatise contains a serious critique of Mendelssohn’s concept. The treatise indicates an interesting picture of a certain competition between the authors of philosophical concepts of the German Enlightenment. The sides of the “Russian” period in L.H. von Jakob’s biography are also revealed. The treatise scrutinizes Mendelssohn’s methodological positions, as well as an analytical examination of his axioms. To reproduce this analysis accurately, an attempt is made to compare von Jakob’s philosophical ideas with some of Kant’s ideas. L.H. von Jakob’s philosophy can be defined as critical, with some reservations, in the general history of the German Enlightenment. It contributes substantially to comprehending the essence of the philosophical positions of both Kant and Mendelssohn and also clarifies the nature of the difference between the critiques of these two German thinkers.

About the authors

Alexandr V. Shevtsov

Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University)

Author for correspondence.
Email: ashevzov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0934-6054

Candidate of Sciences in Philosophy; Associate professor at department of Philosophy

4 Volokolamskoye shosse, Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation

References

  1. Jakob LH von. Prüfung der Mendelssohnschen Morgenstunden oder aller spekulativen Beweise für das Daseyn Gottes [Examination of the Mendelssohnschen morning hours or all speculative evidence of the existence of God]. Halle; 1786. P. 334.
  2. Shevtsov AV. Filosofiya L. G fon Yakoba v tractate “Dokazatel’stvo bessmertiya dushy iz ponyatiya dolga” [Philosophy of L. H. von Jakob in the treatise of “Proof of the immortality of the soul from the concept of duty”], in Sbornik: Vizantiya, Evropa, Rossiya: sozial’nyje praktiki I vzaimosvyaz’ duhovnyh tradizyj. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoj konferenzyi. Sankt-Peterburg; 2021. P. 267—280. (In Russian)
  3. Kant I. Einige Bemerkungen von Herrn Professor Kant [A few comments by Professor Kant], in L. H. von Jakob, Prüfung der “Mendelssohnschen Morgenstunden” oder aller spekulativen Beweise für das Daseyn Gottes [Examination of the “Mendelssohnschen morning hours” or all speculative evidence of the existence of God]. Halle; 1786. P. XLIX—LX.
  4. Mendelssohn M. Phädon, oder ueber die Unsterblichkeit der Seele [Phedo, or about the immortality of the soul]. Leipzig: Ph. Reclam; 1871.
  5. Shevtsov AV. Filosofskoye ucheniye M. Mendel’sona v tractate “Fedon ili o bessmertii dushy” [The philosophical doctrine of M. Mendelssohn in the treatise “Phädon or on the immortality of the soul”]: In. Vestnik Leningrad A. S. Pushkin State University. 2021. #3: P. 33—42. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.35231/18186653_2021_3_33
  6. Shevtsov AV. Traktat M. Mendel’sona “Fedon, ili o bessmertii dushy”. Prilozheniye [“Treatise of M. Mendelssohn “Phädon, or on the immortality of the soul”. Appendix”]. In: Shevtsov A.V. M.I. Karinsky I russkaya uyjseologiya kontsa 19th — nachala 20th veka [M. I. Karinsky and Russian epistemology of the late 19 — early
  7. centuries]. Moscow: Mir filosofii. 2017. P. 261—274. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.35231/18186653_2022_1_20
  8. Shevtsov AV. “Kantian criticism of the Mendelssohnian soul constancy proof”, Vestnik Leningrad A. S. Pushkin State University. 2022;(1):20—30. (In Russian)
  9. Kalinnikov LA. “Regarding Kant’s preface to the book by Ludwig Heinrich Jakob “The Mendelssohnian “Test of the Morning Hours”” (preface to publication)”, Kantovsky sbornik [Kantovsky collection]. 2015;2(52):97—104. (In Russian)
  10. Koptsev ID, translator. “Neskol’ko zamechanij I. Kanta k “Ispytaniju Mendel’sonovyh “Utrennih chasov”” Lydviga Genriha Jakoba” [“Several remarks by I. Kant on the “Mendelsohnian Test of the “Morning Hours” by Ludwig Heinrich Jakob”], Kantovsky sbornik [Kantovsky collection]. 2015;2(52):105–108. (In Russian)
  11. Jakob LH. von. Spogadi pro moye zhyttya [Memories of my life], comment. S. O. Synyurka, S. I. Posohov, red., O. M. Beloserova, transl. Kharkiv: Publication of the University of Kharkiv named after V.N. Karazin; 2016. (In Ukrainian)
  12. Jakob LH. von. Grundriss der allgemeinen Logik und kritische Anfangsgründe der allgemeinen Metaphysik [General logic plan and critical initial reasons for general metaphysics]. Vierter vermehrte Auflage. Halle: bei Hemmerde und Schwetschke; 1800.
  13. Jakob LH von. Beweis für die Unsterblichkeit der Seele aus dem Begriffe der Pflicht [Proof of the immortality of the soul from the concept of duty]. Züllichau: In der Frommannischen Buchhandlung; 1794.
  14. Heine H. “K istorii religii I filosofii v Germanii” [To the history of religion and philosophy in Germany]. In: Heine H. Compete. Works in 10 vols. Vol. 6. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatel’stvo hudozhestvennoy literatury; 1958. (In Russian)
  15. Shevtsov AV. ”K istorii religii I filosofii v Germanii” kak istoriko filosofskij ocherk G. Geine [“To the History of Religion and Philosophy in Germany” as a historical and philosophical essay by H. Heine]. Vestnik Leningrad A. S. Pushkin State University. 2020;(1):33—41. (In Russian)
  16. Fichte IG. Yasnoye, kak solnce, soobshcheniye shyrokoy publike o sushscnosti noveyshey filosofii [A Crystal-Clear Report to the General Public Concerning the Actual Essence of the Newest Philosophy]. In: Fichte IG. Complete Works in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Saint Petersburg: Mithril; 1993. P. 563—667. (In Russian)
  17. Radlov EL. Ocherk istorii russkoy filosofii [Essay on the History of Russian Philosophy]. In: Emel’yanov BV, Lybutin KN, editors. Vvedensky A.I., Losev A.F., Radlov E.L., Shpet G.G.: Ocherki istorii russkoy filosofii [Vvedensky A.I., Losev A.F., Radlov E.L., Shpet G.G.: Essays on the History of Russian Philosophy]. Sverdlovsk: Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta; 1991. P. 96—216. (In Russian)
  18. Shpet GG. Ocherk razvitiya russkoy filosofii [“Essay on the Development of Russian Philosophy”]. In: Emel’yanov BV, Lybutin KN, editors. Vvedensky A.I., Losev A.F., Radlov E.L., Shpet G.G.: Ocherki istorii russkoy filosofii [Vvedensky A.I., Losev A.F., Radlov E.L., Shpet G.G.: Essays on the History of Russian Philosophy]. Sverdlovsk: Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta; 1991. P. 217—592. (In Russian)
  19. Yakovenko BV. Istoriya russkoy filosofii [History of Russian philosophy]. Solodukhin YN, translator, editor. Moscow: Respublika; 2003. (In Russian)
  20. Kruglov AN. Filosofija Kanta v Rossiji v konce 18th — pervoy polovine 19th [Kant’s philosophy in Russia in the late 18th — first half of the 19th centuries]. Moscow: Kanon+; 2009. (In Russian)
  21. Mendelssohn M. Morgenstunden oder Vorlesungen über das Daseyn Gottes [The Morning hours or lectures about the being of the God]. Berlin: Holzinger; 2017.
  22. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma [Critique of pure reason]. Moscow: Mysl’; 1994. (In Russian)

Copyright (c) 2022 Shevtsov A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies