Towards Methods and Tasks of the Digital Indology
- Authors: Bilimoria P.1, Paribok A.V.1, Pskhu R.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Рeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
- Issue: Vol 26, No 2 (2022): INDIAN PHILOSOPHY AND CULTURE
- Pages: 237-244
- Section: INDIAN PHILOSOPHY AND CULTURE
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/31362
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2022-26-2-237-244
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article describes the state of affairs and prospects for research and development in the domain of active use of digitalization and computer programming in the study of the Indian intellectual tradition. The term “Digital Indology” is used this term as an analogy of the expression “Digital Humanities”. Here, it will be understood as the reception and study of philosophical and other classical texts of Ancient and Medieval India with the usage of digital technologies, mathematical statistics, contextual analysis methods alongside with the traditional well-established approaches of philosophy and the humanities. The main trends in the development of digital philosophical Indology are being outlined (viz. the formation of a unified computer database of Indian classical texts, the development of special programs that allow setting and solving new pertaining to the content, as well as historical tasks in the study of various texts of various groups, etc.) The use of mathematical statistics and the methods of contextual analysis are suggested as typical auxiliary methods while analyzing classical texts of India. We do not close our eyes to the possible hidden dangers of a possible fascination with digital methods. Our brief manifesto of Digital Philosophical Indology is to define it exclusively being tool for classical Indological research, which retain its specific philosophical objectives and goals.
About the authors
Purushottama Bilimoria
Рeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Email: p.bilimoria@unimelb.edu.au
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0755-0983
PhD in Philosophy, leading scientist of Purushottama Research Centre
6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198, Russian FederationAndrei Vsevolodovich Paribok
Рeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Email: watanparast@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0100-4412
Candidate of Sciences in Philology; researcher of Purushottama Research Centre
6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198, Russian FederationRuzana Vladimirovna Pskhu
Рeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: r.pskhu@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5558-6518
Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Professor, Professor of the History of Philosophy Department of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; main researcher of Purushottama Research Centre
6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198, Russian FederationReferences
- Codogno M. Matematica in pausa caffè. Minsk: Discourse; 2020. (In Russian).
- Saveliev V. Stats in Cats. Moscow: AST Publ.; 2021. (In Russian).
- Popper K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Moscow: Respublika publ.; 2005. (In Russian).
- Paribok AV, Pskhu RV. Methodological and Substantial Arguments Against “Conceptual Eurocentrism”. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2019;62(6):54—69. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-6-54-69 (In Russian).
- Bronkhorst J. Traditional and Modern Sanskrit Scholarship: How Do They Relate to Each Other. In: Michaels A., editor. The Pandit: Traditional Scholarship in India. Delhi: Manohar; 2001. P. 167–180.
- Pskhu RV. Digital Indology. Some remarks and suggestion. In: The 3rd (Hybrid) International Conference on Recent Development in Engineering & Technology (ICRDET). 2022 February 25 (Fri.) — February 26 (Sat.); Anand International College of Engineering; Jaipur, India; 2022. P. 35.
- Pskhu RV. On Śrīraṅgagadya of Rāmānuja. In: Dubyanskiy Readings. 1st International Academic Conference. Moscow, November 18-20, 2021. Moscow; 2021. P. 43—44. (In Russian).
- Pskhu RV. Philosophical Sanskrit and Difficult Process of its Russian Translation. Voprosy Filosofii. 2016;(3):80—89. (In Russian).
- Pskhu RV, Kryshtop LE, Paribok AV. To the Statement of a Question on Periodization of History of Indian Philosophy. Voprosy Filosofii. 2019;(1):146—163. (In Russian).