Philosophy of Human Dignity in the Problem Field of the Global World

Cover Page

Cite item


The article discusses human dignity in the aspect of modern challenges of technological civilization, which has entered a new stage of its development. Human dignity as a category of ethics remains underestimated, since in the first row of ethical values humanitarians, as a rule, put the categories of freedom and justice. Today, “dignity” acquires a special and higher status, the concept of human dignity is being rethought, going beyond the ethical category itself as a virtue. In the global world, human dignity is a response to such contemporary challenges as the formation of a communicative world community with a focus on digital civilization, the anthropological problem of the future of humanity, the ecological situation on a global scale, the reorientation of the ethical and legal relations of a globalizing world. Human dignity is a problem of national-ethnic and national-state relations in the transition to transnational regulatory interactions. In the interpretation of the nation, the authors do not share the well-known two approaches to understanding the nation, on the one hand ethnocultural, and on the other - national-civil. Both approaches lead, whenever possible or necessary, to the transnational posing of the question, when human dignity becomes a priority regardless of nationality. In this connection, the utopian idea of the possibility of a global ethos is touched upon. The authors focus on the anthropoxy-axiological approach to the understanding of human dignity, where the cosmological principle of human existence is determined by his creative power. The urgency of the problem of human dignity is due to the fact that, as it were, in the modern life world a person did not put the economy above morality, the basis of human dignity in its being is a value moral consciousness, in the depth of which basic human values of transnational nature “work”, contradicting values consumer society driven by practical interests. Human dignity in this regard should be interpreted as an absolute value and at the same time one should take into account the multidimensionality of the problem of dignity in the context of modern globalization processes. Based on the ontological understanding of globalization as megatrends in the self-movement of the natural historical process, the authors substantiate the anthropological value of human dignity, which has universal, transcultural significance. The use of an anthropoxy-axiological approach and interdisciplinary methods reveals the universal value of virtue, based on the anthropo-social moral nature and the creative value of man. The creative transformational activity itself will not be worthy in quality without moral responsibility. The modern concept of human dignity is addressed to the ethics of responsibility, which means responsibility, which highlights the moral and axiological attitude to life, the adoption of responsible decisions in modern conditions of sociocultural interactions. In the context of globalization, the philosophy of human dignity becomes the dominant of all conscious-volitional activities, the core of the moral rethinking of the transnational and national ratio in the light of tolerance, the ability to non-violence. At the same time, the authors indicate in the formulation of the main issue of the philosophy of human dignity the possibility of going beyond the ethical category of human dignity, since the unchanging core of the universal human values of goodness-beauty-truth does not lose its meaning in the global, changing world.

About the authors

G. G. Kolomiets

Orenburg State University

Author for correspondence.

доктор философских наук, профессор, профессор кафедры философии и культурологии

Prospect Pobedy, 13, Orenburg, Russian Federation, 460018

Y. V. Parusimova

Orenburg State University


кандидат философских наук, доцент кафедры философии и культурологии

Prospect Pobedy, 13, Orenburg, Russian Federation, 460018

I. V. Kolesnikova

Orenburg State University


кандидат философских наук, старший преподаватель кафедры философии и культурологии

Prospect Pobedy, 13, Orenburg, Russian Federation, 460018


  1. Stepin VS. The problem of values in the context of the dialogue of cultures. Dialogue of cultures in the context of globalization: XI International Likhachev Scientific Readings. May 12—13, 2011. Vol. 1: Reports. St Petersburg; 2011. P. 153—157. (In Russ.).
  2. Kolomiets GG. From liberal to supranational values in the modern cultural space. Bulletin Orenburg State University. 2012; 4 (136):109—113. (In Russ.).
  3. Kuchuradi I. The concept of human dignity and human rights. Questions of philosophy. 2018;(5):43—51. [Electronic resource]. Access: content&task= view&id=1953&Itemid=52). (In Russ.).
  4. Guseynov AA. Philosophy — thought and action: articles, reports, lectures, interviews. St Petersburg; 2012. 848 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Voropaeva YuP. Ethics of human dignity in the context of globalization: diss. for competition scholar. degree of candidate philosopher. Sciences, Moscow: Lomonosov State University; 2015. 188 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Voropaeva YuP, Kolomiets GG. Ethics of human dignity: history and modernity. Orenburg, 2017. 244 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Kofman E, Youngs G, eds. Globalization: Theory and Practice. London: Continuum, 1996. P. 44—45.
  8. Chumakov AN. On the subject and boundaries of globalism. Age of globalization. 2008;(1):8—13. (In Russ.).
  9. Barlybaev KhA. Man, globalization, sustainable development: a monograph. Moscow; 2007. 276 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Granin YuD. Globalization: the dialectic of historical forms of implementation. Age of globalization. 2014;(1):94; Inozemtsev VL. Modern globalization and its perception in the world. Age of globalization. 2008;(1):44. (In Russ.).
  11. Held D. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Culture. Moscow; 2004. 576 p.
  12. Goldman AH. Life's Values: Pleasure, Happiness, Well-Being, and Meaning. University of Miami, 2018. 192 p.
  13. Tugarinov VP. On the values of life and culture. Leningrad; 1960; Tugarinov LP. The theory of values in Marxism. Leningrad; 1968. 124 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Tail VM. Ethics of human dignity. Moscow; 1998. 176 p. (In Russ.).
  15. Agazzi E. Rethinking the philosophy of science today. Questions of Philosophy. 2009;(1):40—52. (In Russ.).
  16. Voropaeva YuP, Kolomiets GG. Ethics of human dignity: history and modernity: a monograph. Orenburg; 2017. 244 p. (In Russ.).
  17. Huseynov AA. Once again about the possibility of a global ethos. Age of Globalization. 2009;(1):16—27. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2019 Kolomiets G.G., Parusimova Y.V., Kolesnikova I.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies