Representation of Russia in the British online sources in 2022

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The article examines peculiarities of representation of russia in British online sources in 2022, when russia launched a special military operation in ukraine. the author used a statistical approach to analysis based on the factiva monitoring system, the database of which contains about 4.5 million texts published on 416 British online resources from January 1 to december 31, 2022 at both national and regional levels. sentiment analysis (factiva version) was used to determine the tone of the messages. the analysis showed that in 2022, russia ranked fourth in terms of number of articles with its mention in the analyzed corpus of texts, the first being the united Kingdom itself, the second, the united states, and the third, ukraine. from the point of view of the agenda-setting theory (mcCombs, shaw), this fact indicates the high importance of russia for the uK media. most often, materials mentioning russia on British online resources in 2022 were published by the national editions of “the financial times”, “the independent” and “the times”. at the regional level, the largest number of text materials mentioning russia was found: in england - on the website of the radio station “City am online”; in northern ireland - on the website of “lurgan mail”; in Wales - on the website of “the Western mail”; in scotland - on the portal “thescottishsun.co.uk”. the British media were more focused on covering the non-military aspects of the russian-ukrainian conflict, mainly, on political and economic problems. In general, the neutral tone of this set of materials prevailed, that is explained by the absolute dominance of short non-evaluative information messages in it. This is true for both national and regional publications. At the same time, materials of a negative tone prevail over positive ones when it comes to Russia. A difference was found in the intensity of negative coverage of Russia in national and regional online sources in the UK. The most rigid position is taken by national British sources. Among the regional ones, the negative focus on online resources in England is greater, and sources in Scotland and Northern Ireland show the least negative tone.

About the authors

Alexander V. Sharikov

National Research University Higher School of Economics

Author for correspondence.
Email: asharikov@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6035-5960

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor at the Institute of Media, Communications, Media and Design Department, scientific supervisor of the program “Media Management”

20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation

References

  1. Boeva-Omelechko, N.B., & Posternyak, K.P. (2021). Transformation of the image-concept of Russia in British political media discourse: a diachronic aspect. Imagology and Comparative Studies, 16, 148–173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/24099554/16/10
  2. Boydstun, A.E., Hardy, A., & Walgrave, S. (2023). Two faces of media attention: media storm versus non-storm coverage. Communications. Media. Design, 8(1), 156–194. (In Russ.)
  3. Budaev, E.V. (2007). Post-Soviet reality in the metaphors of the Russian and British press. Nizhny Tagil: Nizhny Tagil State Social Pedagogical Institute Publ. (In Russ.)
  4. Bystritsky, A.G., & Sharikov, A.V. (2021). Russia’s representation in the global online in-formation space. International Affairs, 2, 76–93. (In Russ.)
  5. Gromyko, A.A. (2008). Images of Russia and Great Britain: reality and prejudices. Moscow: Russian Souvenir. (In Russ.)
  6. Guo L., Tien Vu H., & McCombs M. (2019). An expanded perspective on agenda-setting effects. Exploring the third level of agenda setting. Communication. Media. Design, 4(1), 62–83.
  7. Karpukhina, T.P. (2019). Hate speech as a manipulative means of forming the inimical image of Russia in British and American mass-media (viewed from the aspect of the English language taught to Russian students). Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, 21(1), 212–222. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-212-222
  8. Koshkarova, N.N. (2019). Linguistic, pragmatic, and stylistic peculiarities of 2018 FIFA World Cup representation in British media-discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(3), 802–819. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-3-802-819
  9. Kotsyubinskaya, L.V. (2017). Information attack: definition and essential characteristics. Political Linguistics, 6(66), 106–111. (In Russ.)
  10. Kovyazina, М.А., Ilyushchenya, Т.А., & Khabibullina, S.B. (2018). Negative evaluative language in description of anti-Russian sanctions policy and of Russian counter-sanctions in British online media discourse: a corpus research. Political Linguistics, 2(68), 61–67. (In Russ.)
  11. Krasilnikova, N.A. (2007). “Captives of Russian bear”: Russia today in UK & USA mass media. Political Linguistics, 1(21), 92–97. (In Russ.)
  12. Kushneruk, S.L. (2018). Discourse-world of information-psychological war in the British online media. Ecology of Language and Communicative Practice, 4(15), 79–91. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17516/2311-3499-041
  13. Kushneruk, S.L. (2023). Ideological world modeling in the context of information and psychological warfare. Moscow: Flinta. (In Russ.)
  14. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D.L. (1972). Agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
  15. Pchelkina, N.M. (2015). The image of Russia and Russians through the prism of the British quality press. Education. Science. Scientific personnel, 1, 283–288. (In Russ.)
  16. Rassokha, M.N. (2006). The image of Russia in the journalistic discourse of Great Britain (based on materials from Independent articles). New Russian humanitarian studies, 1. (In Russ.)
  17. Sokolov, V.M. (2010). The image of Russia in the British press in the early 1990s. (cultural aspect). Bulletin of Orenburg State University, 1(107), 64–69. (In Russ.)
  18. Posternyak, K.P. (2021). Dynamics of verbalization of the image-concept “Russia” in Bri­tish media discourse of the 20th–21st centuries. (Ph.D. Dissertation). Belgorod. (In Russ.)
  19. Sharikov, A.V. (2021). Global online media landscape 2020: dynamic characteristics. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2, 445–463. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.2.1926
  20. Sharikov, A.V. (2023). Representation of Russia and the USA in the global online information space and on Russian and American resources. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 28(1), 108–121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2023-28-1-108-121
  21. Sharikov, A.V. (2022). The reaction of the global online information space to the military special operation in Ukraine: statistical media dynamics. International Affairs, 4, 54–73. (In Russ.)
  22. Shaw, D., & McCombs, M. (2008). Agenda setting in the new media landscape: two perspectives and approaches to research. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of Texas at Austin.
  23. Tagiltseva, Yu.R. (2018). Strategies and tactics of the information-psychological war in the context of Russian-British relations. Ecology of Language and Communicative Practice, 4(15), 92–104. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.17516/2311-3499-041
  24. Uzhegova, Z.A. (1999). The image of the ‘new’ Russia in the West. Based on materials from the American and British press. (Ph.D. Dissertation). Moscow. (In Russ.)
  25. Zarubina, N.E. (2018). The role of evaluative vocabulary in creating the image of Russia in the Western mass media. Bulletin of Kostroma State University, 24(2), 244–247. (In Russ.)
  26. Zheltukhina, M.R., & Paramonova, D.V. (2020). Image of Russia in the Coronavirus era: verbal American, British, and Spanish media broadcast. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 3, 22–32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2020-3-22-32

Copyright (c) 2024 Sharikov A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies