Safety of reproduced pharmaceuticals and legal issues of their circulation in Russia

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Due to restrictions on importing medicines from abroad, the domestic pharmaceutical industry is shifting its focus towards the development and manufacturing generic drugs - medications containing a pharmacological substance identical to the original (previously patented/registered). However, the issue of drug interchangeability remains a subject of debate in both scientific circles and practical applications. Bioequivalence studies often raise concerns due to disparitites in therapeutic effects, posing a high risk of adverse reactions and symptoms. The authors aim to establish a comprehensive understanding of the feasibility and safety of introducing generic drugs in the Russian Federation. To achieve this goal, they utilize a range of general scientific cognitive methods, including analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, and generalization, as well as systemic, logical-semantic and dialectical approaches. Special legal methodologies, such as formal legal, comparative legal and technical legal analyses, are also employed. It has become evident that generic drug safety and effectiveness in Russia are not subject to thorough evaluation. Analogues are entering the market without undergoning essential therapeutic equivalence assessments, leaving their specific pharmacological properties merely a matter of speculation. The study concludes that while maintaining the balance in the pharmaceutical market through generic drugs is essential, it must be executed with caution. Balancing public interests in replacing foreign drugs with domestic alternatives must be done in harmony with private interests. The authors advocate for a judicial practice that prioritizes individual patient rights, regardless of the country of origin of the drug, since restrictions on the rights of drug’s country of origin, as limiting citizens’ access to medically necessary drugs - domestic or foreign - undermines the fundamental right to healthcare.

About the authors

Alexander V. Savoskin

Ural State University of Economics

Author for correspondence.
Email: savoskinav@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7112-6845
SPIN-code: 9572-0502

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Constitutional and International Law

62/45 8 Marta str./Narodnaya Volya, Yekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation

Vitaly A. Rukoleev

Ural State University of Economics

Email: v.a.rukoleev@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6879-9192
SPIN-code: 4210-8243

Assistant of the Department of Constitutional and International Law

62/45 8 Marta str./Narodnaya Volya, Yekaterinburg, 620144, Russian Federation

References

  1. Fitilev, S.B., Vozzhaev, A.V., Shkrebniova, I.I. & Kliuev, D.A. (2018) The problem of over-volunteering in early phase clinical trials. Good Clinical Practice. (2), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.24411/2588-0519-2018-10045 (in Russian).
  2. Ganeva, E.O. & Filatova, U.B. (2022) Animals as objects of civil rights: the legal regime of laboratory animals in russia and abroad. Civil law. (6), 23-26. https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2022-6-23-26 (in Russian).
  3. Gildeeva, G.N., Belostotsky, A.V. & Smirnov, V.V. (2016) Bioequivalence studies as a way to assess interchangeability of medicines: challenges and limitations. Bulletin of Roszdravnadzor. (2), 46-49. (in Russian).
  4. Gozzo, L., Caraci, F. & Drago, F. (2022) Bioequivalence, Drugs with Narrow Therapeutic Index and The Phenomenon of Biocreep: A Critical Analysis of the System for Generic Substitution. Healthcare. 10(8), 1392. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10081392
  5. Hasan, Md., Shimu, S., Akther, A., Jahan, I., Hamiduzzaman, Md., & Hasan, A.H.M. (2021) Development of Generic Drug Products by Pharmaceutical Industries Considering Regulatory Aspects: A Review. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines. 9(10), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2021.910003
  6. Khokhlov, A.L. (2018) Modern approaches to analytical research in the creation of medicines. Moscow, Russian Academy of Sciences. (in Russian).
  7. Kostanyan, A.A. & Ivleva, M.I. (2023) Analysis of state regulation of import substitution in the pharmaceutical market of the Russian Federation. Business. Education. Law. 3(64), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.25683/VOLBI.2023.64.727 (in Russian).
  8. Kosyakova, N.V. (2019) Scientific substantiation and development of methodological foundations of the drug management system for patients with orphan diseases at the territorial level (on the example of the Southern Federal District). Doctor of Pharmaceutical Sciences dissertation. Moscow, Rostov State Medical University. (in Russian).
  9. Lesonen, A.S. (2016) Comprehensive study of the availability of antiallergic antihistamines at the regional level. Candidate of Pharmaceutical Sciences dissertation. Moscow, RUDN University. (in Russian).
  10. Lileeva, E.G., Speshilova, S.A., Chugunnaya, S.M., Miroshnikov, A.E., Khokhlov, A.A. & Balashova, T.A. (2014) Experience in conducting research on bioequivalence of medicines, ethical aspects. Medical Ethics Journal. 2(1), 22-27. (in Russian).
  11. Mahato, T., Sharma, S., Patel, A., Ojha, S. & Agnihotri, V. (2023) Prescribing by generic name: pros and cons. Poetique. 10(9), 61-72.
  12. Maksimov, M.L. & Ermolaeva, A.S. (2018) Topical issues of interchangeability of medicinal preparations: original bisoprolol or reproduced drugs (generics)? RMJ. 26(6-1), 29-32. (in Russian).
  13. Mareev, I.V., Samykina, I.A., Kolokoltsova, M.Y., Pimenov, I.D., Tomofeev, M.S., Kulikov, E.S., Deev, I.A., Borodulina, E.V., Kobyakova, O.S. & Udut, V.V. (2018) Motivation and participation experience of healthy volunteers in the clinical trials of bioequivalence in Russia. Drug development & registration. 1(22), 198-204. (in Russian).
  14. Martsevich, S.Y. & Tolpygina, S. (2009) Original drugs and their generics: a problem of choice. Arterial Hypertension. 15(2), 209-213. https://doi.org/10.18705/1607-419X-2009-15-2-209-213 (in Russian).
  15. Nabin, M., Mohan, V., Nicholas, A., & Sgro, P. (2012) Therapeutic Equivalence and the Generic Competition Paradox. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy. 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/1935-1682.3234
  16. Panigrahy, S. & Chaudhari, S. (2022) Knowledge and Perceptions of Generic Drugs: A Cross Sectional Study. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 12(2-S), 53-57. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v12i2-S.5412
  17. Pereverzev, A.P. (2021) Original and reproduced medicinal products: are they comparable? Emphasis on moxonidine. RMJ. 29(9), 6-10 (in Russian).
  18. Potupchik, T.V., Veselova, O.F., Evert, L.S., Okladnikov, E.V., Gatskikh, I.V., Shalda, T.P. & Storozhenko, S.E. (2015) Awareness of brand name and generic drugs. Farmatsiya. (6), 30-32 (in Russian).
  19. Reichtman, T.V. (2018) Improvement of state mechanisms for managing the availability of medical care. Doctor of Pharmaceutical Sciences dissertation. Moscow, RUDN University. (in Russian).
  20. Rogov, E.S. & Talibov, O.B. (2017) Risk assessment in clinical trials with healthy volunteers participation. Medical Ethics Journal. 5 (1), 21-26 (in Russian).
  21. Sestino, A. & Amatulli, C. (2021) Branded vs. Generic drugs: the role of self-perceived seriousness of disease. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPHM-10-2020-0090
  22. Sokolov, A.V., Kukes, V.G., Rodina, T.A., Prokofiev, A.B., Arkhipov, V.V., Krasnykh, L.M. & Sоkоvа, Е.А. (2015) The present issues of bioequivalence. Brugs and rational pharmacotherapy. (1), 12-18 (in Russian).
  23. Strauss, J. & Greeff, O.B.W. (2015) Excipient-related adverse drug reactions: A clinical approach. Current Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 28(1), 24-27
  24. Swakowska, K., Religioni, U., & Staniszewska, A. (2023) Opinion of Polish Patients with Epilepsy on Generic Medications. Healthcare. 11(20), 2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11202717
  25. Ushkalova, E.A., Zyryanov, S.K., & Gopienko, I.A. (2021) Generic drugs: benefit/risk ratio. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 13(6), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2021-6-98-104 (in Russian).
  26. Vasilenko, G.F., Krasnykh, L.M., Zhuravleva, M.V., Prokofiev, A.B., Gorodetskaya, G.I., Smirnov, V.V. & Bunyatyan, N.D. (2022) Comparative dissolution kinetics of several multisource thioctic acid products. Regulatory Research and Medicine Evaluation. 12(3), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2022-12-3-331-340 (in Russian).
  27. Yaichkov, I. I. (2019) The features of researches of generic drugs. Medical Ethics Journal. 7(1), 84-101. (in Russian).
  28. Zhuravleva, M.V., Prokofiev, A.B., Chernykh, T.M., Lazareva, N.B., Berdnikova, N.G. & Serebrova, S.Yu. (2016) The epoch of generics: pros and cons. Epidemiology and infectious diseases. (1), 52-58. (in Russian).
  29. Zyryanov, S.K., Fitilev, S.B., Shkrebneva, I.I. & Vozzhaev, A.V. (2017) Drug interchangeability - clinical efficacy and safety. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 1, 4-10. https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2017-1S-4-10 (in Russian).

Copyright (c) 2024 Savoskin A.V., Rukoleev V.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies