RUDN Journal of Law
type: channel
description: Editor-in-Chief: Oleg A. Yastrebov, Doctor of Laws, Doctor of Economics, full professor ISSN: 2313-2337 (Print) ISSN: 2408-9001 (Online) Founded in 1997. Publication frequency: quarterly PUBLISHER: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University) Open Access: . APC: no article processing charge Peer-Review: double blind. Publication language: Russian, English Indexation: White List, Russian Index of Science Citation, RSCI, DOAJ, Crossref, Google Scholar, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, WorldCat, Cyberleninka, Dimensions, ResearchBib, Lens, Research4Life, JournalTOCs, British Library, Bodleian Libraries (University of Oxford), Ghent University Library
publisher: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)
language: ru-RU
publication name: RUDN Journal of Law
issn: 2313-2337
copyright: The right of authorship belongs to the authors of articles. The authors transfer the rights to use the article (including the use and distribution of an article in the Open Access) to the publisher of the journal on a non-exclusive license (Publishing Agreement (Public Offer)). At the same time, authors remain full rightsholders. Publishing Agreement (Public Offer) to Publish an Article in an Academic Periodical 'RUDN Journal of Law' The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), represented by the Vice-Rector for Scientific Work Kostin Andrey Alexandrovich, acting under a Power of Attorney No 0036-03/21-163 dated 12.10.2021, hereinafter referred to as the Publisher, on the one hand, hereby offers to the public at large, hereinafter referred to as the Author, on the other hand, hereinafter collectively referred to as the Parties, to enter into this agreement, hereinafter referred to as the Agreement, regarding publication of scholarly materials, hereinafter referred to as the Article, in the Journal named 'RUDN Journal of Law', hereinafter referred to as the Journal, under the following terms. 1. General Terms and Conditions 1.1. Pursuant to Clause 2 of the Article 437 of the Russian Federation Civil Code, this Agreement shall be recognized as the public offer, hereinafter referred to as the Offer. Subject to Article 438 of the Russian Federation Civil Code, this Offer shall be deemed to have been completely and irrevocably accepted after the Author had submitted his/her materials by uploading those onto the network electronic system of the article acquisition for review available at the respective section of the Journal's site at URL: http://journals.rudn.ru/index.php/law/author/submit/1 on the Information and Communication Network known as the Internet, hereinafter referred to as the Internet. 1.2. Pursuant to the Russian Federation effective law as a…
items: The concept of the Anthropocene and its impact on Russian legal doctrine and environmental legislation
items: The Rule of Law: Between Ideology and Myth
items: The Pragmatics of Metaphor in the Language of Law: Gnoseological Aspect
items: Law and biomedicine: Main risks, new approaches to regulation
items: Alexander Vladimirovich Lokhvitsky (1830-1884): Teacher, scientist, lawyer
items: Concept and strategies for resolving conflicts between special legal rules
items: Types of normative hierarchies: The principle of “lex superior” in R. Guastini’s approach to legal conflicts
items: Social protection of workers on digital labor platforms: Approaches to addressing the issue
items: Identification of the substantial characteristics of law in the digital age
items: Mechanism of legal culture formation among digital citizens
items: Biometric data as a tool for remote personal identification
items: The effectiveness of public administration as a factor in ensuring state policy on wildlife conservation: A theoretical and practical analysis
items: Party autonomy with effect against third parties as a means of harmonizing and unifying regulation of transfer of ownership in the private international law
items: https://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/47868

The concept of the Anthropocene and its impact on Russian legal doctrine and environmental legislation
type: item
description: The concept of anthropocene, which refers to a new geological epoch characterized by significant human impact of Earth’s ecosystems, represents much more than a new understanding of the environment as a complex, dynamic set of Earth's ecosystems. It calls for a fundamental change in how legal science and practice conceptualize the relationship between humans and nature. The antropoce demands a shift in the category of man and their relationship with living and inanimate natural elements, which have been little studied in modern legal science. As a result, the concept of anthropocene acts as a catalyst for legal transformation, pushing it beyond traditional approaches towards the development of a global legal system adequate to the planetary scale of current evological challenges. For environmental law, anthropocene imposes a scientifically grounded imperative: legislation must acknowledge that human activity can destroy the foundations of life on Earth. Principles like harm prevention and sustainability should become central norms at municipal, national, and international levels. It also stimulates innovation in legal categories such as ecocide, nature rights, climate refugees and fosters hybrid legal regimes, for instance, integrating environmental law with energy law to decarbonize the economy. Recognizing antropocene enables countries like Russia to participate actively in shaping international ecological rules and to contribute scientifically and practically. An internal policy informed by anthropocene factors can also shift from reactive responses to proactive prevention of systemic climate and socio-ecological crises.
creator: Aleksey P. Anisimov
creator: Yulia I. Isakova
creator: Gennady S. Pratsko
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Anisimov A.P., Isakova Y.I., Pratsko G.S. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 819
ending page: 836
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-819-836

The Rule of Law: Between Ideology and Myth
type: item
description: This article provides a critical analysis of the “rule of law,” viewing it as an ideologeme and a social myth. The author explores how this concept, despite its amorphous and polysemous nature, has acquired the status as a tool for addressing global challenges. The article traces the origin and functions of the myth of the rule of law, highlighting its role in the ideological legitimation of power, the formation of national ideologies, and its influence on mass psychology. Employing Roland Barthes’ approach to myth deconstruction, the author identifies rhetorical figures that render conceptions of the rule of law both persuasive and ideologically charged. It is emphasized that the idea of the rule of law often serves as an instrument for justifying hegemonic policies, creating an illusion of legitimacy, and obscuring structural contradictions. In conclusion, the article argues that, despite its mythological character, the idea of the rule of law retains social significance, and its critical understanding is essential for a sober assessment of its potential and limitations.
creator: Ruslan M. Allalyev
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Allalyev R.M. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 837
ending page: 851
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-837-851

The Pragmatics of Metaphor in the Language of Law: Gnoseological Aspect
type: item
description: The language of law functions as a natural, independent regulator and representative of elements within the legal system and state-legal realities. Its lexical apparatus is structured not only by words with direct meanings but also by linguistic products of secondary semiosis, particularly metaphor. The use of metaphor in legal language remains understudied, largely because its admissibility in legal science is a pressing isssue generally resolved against recognizing metaphor as a full-fledged unit of the legal lexical system. This study aims to analyze the pragmatic potential of metaphor in legal language as a tool of legal technique focusing on the neutralization of its expressive connotations and its acquisition of stereotypical status through the activation of its epistemological function. Methodologically, the research employs linguo-legal, logical-linguistic methods, and historical, systemic, and contextual analysis. It is argued that metaphor is among the leading logical-linguistic devices in law and legal science. By activating its pragmatic and epistemological potential under strict contextual conditions, metaphor ensures the semantic accessibility of abstract legal concepts, appeals to a priori legal principles, and enhances the comprehensibility of normative texts. Firmly embedded in the conceptual-linguistic system of law, metaphors, due to their frequent use, acquire a “life” of their own. Without certain metaphors, understanding legal reality and achieving scientific-legal knowledge would be impossible; expressions such as “legal space” and “legal matter” exemplify this. In law, metaphors are typically reproduced as idiomatic lexical units at the terminological level, influencing the formation of legal concepts by orienting understanding toward known experiences and endowing regulated objects with specific characteristics for adequate interpretation. It is concluded that the pragmatic potential of metaphor, particularly epistemological function is one …
creator: Inna A. Yaroshchuk
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Yaroshchuk I.A. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 852
ending page: 868
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-852-868

Law and biomedicine: Main risks, new approaches to regulation
type: item
description: Biomedical technologies have advanced rapidly in recent decades, impacting human nature itself and reshaping the surrounding social environment according to new principles. These developments carry significant implications for law and public policy, highlighting the importance of legal research in regulating biomedical innovation. This article explores the transformation of traditional legal principles in family and inheritance law, focusing primarily on surrogacy under the influence of reproductive technologies. The concept of biolaw is introduced as an integration of law and biomedicine, alongside the emerging interdisciplinary field of neurolaw, which studies how advances in neurobiology influence jurisprudence. Key areas of interaction between neurobiology and law include the development of judicial practice, legislative reform informed by neuroscience evidence, and shifts in the general theory and philosophy of law. Philosophical ideas about constructing future societies grounded in biomedical achievements - proposed by thinkers such as F. Fukuyama, E. Toffler, A. Bard, and J. Söderqvist - are discussed. The article highlights certain central public concerns: social control, biologically based hierarchies, renewed eugenics, and discriminatory practices. It identifies biomedical technologies with potential to fundamentally transform society, the emerging risks they pose, and possible legal ramifications. Examples discussed include the creation of artificial wombs and genome editing, both of which may have applications beyond biomedicine for broader social purposes. The article also points out gaps in Russian legal regulation and presents the results of a comparative legal study, culminating in general recommendations for improving Russian legislation.
creator: Olga V. Romanovskaya
creator: Georgy B. Romanovskiy
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Romanovskaya O.V., Romanovskiy G.B. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 869
ending page: 885
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-869-885

Alexander Vladimirovich Lokhvitsky (1830-1884): Teacher, scientist, lawyer
type: item
description: The objective of this work is to characterize the scientific, pedagogical, and advocacy activities of Alexander Vladimirovich Lokhvitsky, one of the most renowned Russian lawyers of the second half of the 19th century. The sources for this biographical essay include personal documents of. Lokhvitsky’s contemporaries (K.N. Bestuzhev-Ryumin, E.I. Kozlinina, V.I. Nemirovich-Danchenko, A.V. Nikitenko), obituaries, articles from pre-revolutionary dictionaries, Lokhvitsky’s scientific works, his published court speeches, and materials from discussions on advocacy ethics at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. The study concludes that although Lokhvitsky’s pedagogical achievements were somewhat localized, several of his ideas found practical application and remain relevant today. He attained noble success in the scientific realm, with a number of his works continuing to interest specialists. In advocacy, A.V. Lokhvitsky left a significant legacy through his published speeches, many of which serve as exemplary models for court oratory. Among his key contributions was sparking a discourse in Russia on attorney ethics, raising issues that continue to resonate in contemporary legal practice.
creator: Alexey A. Demichev
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Demichev A.A. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 886
ending page: 898
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-886-898

Concept and strategies for resolving conflicts between special legal rules
type: item
description: The paper presents ideas on resolving conflicts between special legal rules. Such norm conflicts occur when several special norms originate from a single general norm vased on different criteria. These are partial norm conflicts, which cannot be resolved directly through the legal maxim of lex specialis. The purpose of this article is to establish an optimal approach for resolving conflicts between special legal rules by analyzing current methodologies addressing such conflicts. The author employs various methods for investigating legal reality, including the systemic approach, conceptual analysis, legal-dogmatic method, comparative approach, and juridical hermeneutic. Five methods for addressing these conflicts are identified. (1) The ‘ostrich’ approach. This method avoids legal conflicts by narrowly interpreting one special rule as part of general rule, enabling direct application of lex specialis. (2) The ‘integrative’ approach: This method eliminates legal conflict by harmonizing the content of special rules through interpretation that aligns them with a common purpose. (3) The ‘essential’ approach: This approach resolves conflicts by identifying a parameter that determines the degree of specialty of colliding norms, then applying the lex specialis maxim accordingly. (4) The ‘meaningful’ approach: This involves describing a universal or localized meta-legal criterion to overcome conflicts, for example, applying the humanistic criterion that famous the norm most beneficial to its addressee (in favorem) in cases of a conflict. (5) The ‘dogmatic” criterion: This criterion resolves conflicts based on other general principles, such as the lex posterior maxim. Due to its neutrality and simplicity, this approach is recommended as the primary methor for resolving conflicts between special norms. If special rules are adopted simulteneously, the ‘essential’ criterion is the preferred method, with the ‘integrative’ approach as a possible alternative.
creator: Alexander A. Petrov
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Petrov A.A. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 899
ending page: 913
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-899-913

Types of normative hierarchies: The principle of “lex superior” in R. Guastini’s approach to legal conflicts
type: item
description: One of the classic principles for resolving legal conflicts - “lex superior derogat legi inferiori” - presupposes the priority of norms derived from a legal act that holds greater legal force or occupies a higher position in the normative hierarchy. However, contemporary legal systems do not operate as straightforward vertical hierarchies, which necessitates further study into the ordering of such systems and the arguments supporting the validity of the norms within them. The purpose of the study is to analyze the approach of the Italian legal scholar Riccardo Guastini concerning four types of normative hierarchies he identifies. The article extensively presents arguments from Guastini’s “Lex Superior” (2013), originally published by the proponent of Genoese legal realism in French, to make them accessible to Russian-speaking researchers. According to R. Guastini, first, there is a formal hierarchy, which exists between norms that govern the creation of law and the laws produced in accordance with those norms. Second, a material hierarchy exists when contradictions between two norms are clearly prohibited by a third, higher-ranking norm. Third, there is a logical hierarchy, wherein one norm refers to another at a metalinguistic level. Finally, fourth, an axiological hierarchy depends on the value judgment of the interpreter, where one norm is considered superior based on interpretive assessments. The article also traces Guastini’s development of the concept of “metanorm”, which, he argues should be reserved exclusively for norms that explicitly reference other norms. Practical examples illustrating the application of these four types of normative hierarchies, in particular, such as the self-restraint exhibited by legislators and the revision processes within the Italian Constitution, are provided toward the end of the article. The study concludes by challenging the views that any hierarchy necessarily precedes interpretation and highlights the susceptibility of Guas…
creator: Dmitrii E. Tonkov
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Tonkov D.E. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 914
ending page: 929
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-914-929

Social protection of workers on digital labor platforms: Approaches to addressing the issue
type: item
description: The problem of social protection for employees of digital labor platforms is actively discussed worldwide, yet balanced solutions that harmoniously reconcile the interests of the state, business entities, consumers, and platform workers have not been found. The effectiveness of these efforts largely depends on accurately classifying persons performing platform work as either employees or independent contractors (self-employed, implementing partners), since their status determines the scope of their social protection. Individuals under employment contracts typically receive more extensive and stable social guarantees than those engaged through civil law contracts. However, platform employment is diverse, and digital labor platforms that act as active intermediaries in local labor markets (for example, taxi services, delivery services, home and home services) blur the boundaries between labor and civil law relations by transforming the status of workers. Legally independent contractors may, in practice, be subject to direct control by the platform through algorithmic management. This blurring makes distinguishing self-employment from disguised employment a pressing scientific and practical challenge, and a prerequisite for developing appropriate social protections regardless of employment form. This article explores possible approaches to solving this problem: judicial reclassification of employment status, establishing presumption of employment relationships, and introducing hybrid employment models into legislation. Examples from various jurisdictions regulating platform work (USA, European Union, Ireland, Spain) illustrate these methods. The study’s relevance is understood by recent Russian federal legislation adopting a civil law model for organizing work on digital platforms. International experience broadens the perspective, highlights advantages and challenges of differing approaches, and guides future efforts to find balanced regulation of platform employment.
creator: Natalia V. Kolotova
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Kolotova N.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 930
ending page: 946
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-930-946

Identification of the substantial characteristics of law in the digital age
type: item
description: The article discusses the need for new approaches to legal research, driven by the introduction of digital technologies into public life. Under these conditions qualitative changes in consciousness and methods of human worldview formation, virtualization of social relations and their value basis, and transformation of cultural identity acquire the significance of typological features of law in the digital age. Digital reality is a special human “habitat” that changes the direction of the evolution of the human brain and consciousness; in combination with social experience, it alters the type of human thinking and worldview; creates conditions for the transformation of the value basis of culture, the splitting of human individuality and cultural identity; virtualizes a significant part of social relations; gives rise to a new structure of society and new forms of social inequality. These directions of evolution of social practice, social relations, their value basis, consciousness, and human worldview, being expressed in law, acquire the significance of its typological characteristics, in which the phenomenon of syncretism manifests itself in a new, unique form. The typological feature of law is its fused, inseparable expression of a complex of natural, biological, and social regularities governing human and social development, as well as technical regularities conditioned by the integration of elements of the digital environment and non-biological resources into human consciousness. The law of the digital age considers value not in the individual, but in their identity, acceptable from the perspective of the official authorities. The legal assessment of this identity is associated with the emergence of a new group of objects of legal regulation-human virtual interpretations of legally significant social meanings. The digital age is giving rise to new forms of social division, the criteria of which are the degree of human integration into virtual space and the human …
creator: Sergey B. Zinkovskiy
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Zinkovskiy S.B. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 947
ending page: 961
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-947-961

Mechanism of legal culture formation among digital citizens
type: item
description: This article studies the mechanism of formation of the legal culture of digital citizens, a concept that reflects the genesis, development, semantic content, and role of this phenomenon amid digital social transformations. The study aims to analyze the mechanism by which the legal culture of digital citizens forms, detailing its stages and components. The research employs methods including systemic, logical, modeling and generalization, forecasting, formal-legal, comparative-legal, and cultural analysis. The concept of legal culture of digital citizens emerges from synthesizing three scientific phenomena: legal culture, citizenship, and digital culture, each contributing distinctive features and attributes. To understand the complex dynamics and consistent functional interaction between traditional elements of legal culture and new elements of citizens’ digital culture, a mechanism design is proposed. This mechanism includes the following stages: acquiring digital competencies; awareness, consolidation and development of digital identity; mastering and reinforcing core digital values and standards of digital thinking; and forming socially active and responsible digital behavior. The mechanism’s components specify the objectives for each stage: digital knowledge, skills, and abilities; digital identity; values and standards of digital thinking; and motivational attitudes fostering lawful and socially active digital behavior. The significance of this mechanism for legal science and practice lies in preserving and advancing humanistic and axiological approaches to defining the individual’s role within the digital society’s legal systen, recognizing the cultural value of digital principles in a citizen’s legal status, and optimizing legal regulation of relations among digital citizens, digital society, and public authorities.
creator: Yulia A. Gavrilova
creator: Yuri A. Bokov
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Gavrilova Y.A., Bokov Y.A. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 962
ending page: 980
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-962-980

Biometric data as a tool for remote personal identification
type: item
description: The article examines biometric data as a tool for remote identification. Biometric data, including voice recording, fingerprints, retinal scans, and otheridentities, hold special significance because they enable the accurate establishment of a person's identity, undersoring the relevance of this research topic. The author analyzes legal aspects of the concept of “biometric data”, principles governing their use, and the advantages and disadvantages of such applications to explore the specifics of employing biometric data for remote identification. The article concludes that current legislation needs refinement through unification and clarification of key conceptual terms. This would enable cleaeter delineation among the concepts of biometric personal data as used in legal regulation, remote identification, authentication, and the pertinent areas of legal governance.
creator: Dmitry S. Zaporozhtsev
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Zaporozhtsev D.S. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 981
ending page: 994
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-981-994

The effectiveness of public administration as a factor in ensuring state policy on wildlife conservation: A theoretical and practical analysis
type: item
description: This article examines various interpretations of the term “state environmental policy” as presented in legal literature. Based on this analysis, the author concludes that the concept encompasses a range of activities carried out by state bodies aimed at protecting natural resources. The article also analyzes the implementation practices of strategic documents regulating hunting and fishing activities. The author finds that certain provisions in these documents are largely declarative and highlights the lack of an effective mechanism for implementing environmental and social indicators used to evaluate public management performance in this domain. Drawing on positive examples from foreign countries in managing conservation and utilization through strategic documents, the author emphasizes the need for an integrated approach to conserving all biological species of wild animals. The paper outlines proposals for implementing the Concept of Sustainable Use of Wildlife, which could serve as a basis for legislative improvements. In the Russian Federation, current state policy in ecology focuses on preserving fauna species that are resources for hunting and fishing, as well as those categorized as rare and endangered.
creator: Svetlana V. Ivanova
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Ivanova S.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 995
ending page: 1012
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-995-1012

Party autonomy with effect against third parties as a means of harmonizing and unifying regulation of transfer of ownership in the private international law
type: item
description: The absence of an effective solution of ownership of movable property in cross-border transactions underscores the relevance of this article. The traditional lex rei sitae connecting factor fails to address issues in cases of mobile conflicts. Party autonomy presents a potential tool to overcome this challenge. However, the primary obstacle to its widespread acceptance is the possible adverse impact of parties’ agreements on the rights of third parties. This article aims to assess the potential application of party autonomy as a means to harmonize and unify the regulation of the transfer of ownership of movables, and to justify the effect of the parties’ chosen legal order on the third-party right. The research employs general scientific methods, including analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, and dialectics, alongside specific legal methods such as dogmatic and comparative analysis. The study concludes that the party autonomy can serve as an effective instrument for harmonizing and unifying regulations governing the transfer of ownership of movables while adequately protecting third-party rights. Third parties are provided with special mechanisms to safeguard their interests. Within the framework of unification, for certain categories of movables, registration systems may offer a means to ensure protection of third-party rights. Consequently, both harmonization and unification prove to be effective regulatory tools for the transfer of ownership of movables. Finally, the article proposes directions for further research, focusing on determining the optimal balance between harmonization and unification in regulating the transfer of ownership through party autonomy, taking into account the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
creator: Elena A. Leontieva
creator: Mikhail A. Oleynikov
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Leontieva E.A., Oleynikov M.A. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 1013
ending page: 1030
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-1013-1030

https://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/47868
type: item
title: The 27th International Interdisciplinary Scientific and Practical Forum ‘Yurtekhnetika’ on ‘Symbols in Law (Doctrine, Practice, Technique)’ : Review of Materials and Presentation of the RUDN Journal of Law
description: -
creator: Valentina S. Nikitina
rights: Copyright (c) 2025 Nikitina V.S. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2025-12-31
publication date: 2025-12-31
volume: 29
number: 4
starting page: 1031
ending page: 1034
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2025-29-4-1031-1034