RUDN Journal of Law
type: channel
description: Editor-in-Chief: Oleg A. Yastrebov, Doctor of Laws, Doctor of Economics, full professor ISSN: 2313-2337 (Print) ISSN: 2408-9001 (Online) Founded in 1997. Publication frequency: quarterly PUBLISHER: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University) Open Access: . APC: no article processing charge Peer-Review: double blind. Publication language: Russian, English Indexation: White List RCSI, Russian Index of Science Citation, RSCI, DOAJ, Crossref, Google Scholar, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, Dimensions
publisher: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)
language: ru-RU
publication name: RUDN Journal of Law
issn: 2313-2337
copyright: The right of authorship belongs to the authors of articles. The authors transfer the rights to use the article (including the use and distribution of an article in the Open Access) to the publisher of the journal on a non-exclusive license (Publishing Agreement (Public Offer)). At the same time, authors remain full rightsholders. Publishing Agreement (Public Offer) to Publish an Article in an Academic Periodical 'RUDN Journal of Law' The Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), represented by the Vice-Rector for Scientific Work Kostin Andrey Alexandrovich, acting under a Power of Attorney No 0036-09/25-122 dated 21.05.2025, hereinafter referred to as the Publisher, on the one hand, hereby offers to the public at large, hereinafter referred to as the Author, on the other hand, hereinafter collectively referred to as the Parties, to enter into this agreement, hereinafter referred to as the Agreement, regarding publication of scholarly materials, hereinafter referred to as the Article, in the Journal named 'RUDN Journal of Law', hereinafter referred to as the Journal, under the following terms. 1. General Terms and Conditions 1.1. Pursuant to Clause 2 of the Article 437 of the Russian Federation Civil Code, this Agreement shall be recognized as the public offer, hereinafter referred to as the Offer. Subject to Article 438 of the Russian Federation Civil Code, this Offer shall be deemed to have been completely and irrevocably accepted after the Author had submitted his/her materials by uploading those onto the network electronic system of the article acquisition for review available at the respective section of the Journal's site at URL: http://journals.rudn.ru/index.php/law/author/submit/1 on the Information and Communication Network known as the Internet, hereinafter referred to as the Internet. 1.2. Pursuant to the Russian Federation effective law as a…
items: International and National Features of Legal Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: Тhe Experience of Russia, China, India
items: Social structure in the digital era: Typological characteristics of state influence on social processes
items: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in legal research: Editor’s insights
items: Methodological Issues in Socio-Legal Research on the Rule of Law
items: International Legal Regime: Theoretical Foundations and Contemporary Structure in the Context of Globalization
items: International Legal Mechanism for Legitimizing the Military Operation of the United States and its Allies in Syria: Implications for Russia’s International Legal Policy
items: DNA Fingerprinting and Genetic Privacy in Algerian and French Law: A Comparative Study
items: Regulation of Digital Assets in the Commonwealth of Australia in the Context of Bankruptcy Estate Formation
items: Modern approaches of foreign countries to admitting foreign investments into the national economy
items: Ideological sources of civil law: Axiological measurement of civil society regulatory mechanisms
items: The right to disconnect or the right to offline as a restriction of the employer’s rights
items: Debureaucratization of Higher Education in Russia: Legislative Innovations, Organizational Challenges, International Experience
items: Organizational, Legal Regulation and Maintenance of State Fingerprint Registration in the Republic of Kazakhstan
items: XIII All-Russian Annual Meeting of Legal Theorists ‘Modern Theoretical Orientations of Legal Science’: Dedicated to the 85th Anniversary of Valery V. Lazarev
items: Review of the lecture: A.V. Fedorov “Criminal Liability of Legal Entities as a New Direction in the Development of Foreign Legislation”, Law Institute of RUDN University, Moscow, March 6, 2026

International and National Features of Legal Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: Тhe Experience of Russia, China, India
type: item
description: The development of legal regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) represents an urgent priority for most contemporary states. However, progress remains uneven, with few nations achieving a balance between AI technological advancement and protections for human rights, the rule of law, and national security in public applications. The article examines the national and international experiences in AI legal regulation, drawing on cases from Russia, China, and India. The research aims to generate evidence-based legal knowledge on AI and its integration across public life spheres, while identifying key trends and primary regulatory directions. The methodology employs comprehensive analysis of legislative and scholarly sources to examine disctinctive features of AI legal regimes, achievements and shortcomings, and associated risks and threats. In conclusion, the legislation of each examined country reflects nationally specific AI regulation, grounded on domestic priorities alongside recognized international norms and principles. These frameworks pursue innovation while mitigating security risks and human rights violations, positioning nations competitively in the global AI technological race.
creator: Elena V. Alferova
creator: Elena V. Skurko
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Alferova E.V., Skurko E.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 215
ending page: 232
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-215-232

Social structure in the digital era: Typological characteristics of state influence on social processes
type: item
description: This article analyzes key characteristics of social structure and their significance for identifying the place and role of the state in social processes during the digital era. The methodological foundation integrates elements of class and stratification theories of social structure, enabling characterization of social groups by their heterogeneity and divergent ideological bases of organization and functioning. The study substantiates that resources shaping the nature and foundations of social structure exhibit varying differentiating power across historical periods. Consequently, differentiation of social structure and its disparities form the basis for conflict potential, overcome through changes in the state’s role, degree of intervention in social processes, and influence on social group formation and development. The state, as a mechanism integrating society, modifies existing value systems to harmonize social interests and prevent threats to sovereignty from opposing forces. The study shows that the digital era combines criteria for socioeconomic inequality and social structure - from purely economic ones to status-based, political, legal, and sociocultural. It features greater polarization and disunity among social groups, reduced upward social mobility, and subordination of social structure to state-strengthening interests and coercive influence. The article substantiates the gradual alienation of most people from influencing social processes in the digital era. This rests on degradation of human rights and freedoms, shifting conceptual and legal bases for state-society-individual interactions, amid a crisis of anthropocentric principles of the social, political, and legal organization of society.
creator: Sergey B. Zinkovskiy
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Zinkovskiy S.B. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 233
ending page: 249
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-233-249

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in legal research: Editor’s insights
type: item
description: The article examines the potential and limitations of using artificial intelligence (AI), primarily large language models, in legal research and editorial practice from the perspective of an academic journal editor. Its purpose is to show how AI can accelerate routine scholarly and editorial tasks (search and selection of sources, preparation of factual background, structuring and preliminary editing of texts), while simultaneously raising methodological, ethical and responsibility-related questions for the human author. Methodologically, the study relies on a qualitative, analytic-descriptive approach, grounded in the author’s own editorial experience with AI tools, targeted test interactions with neural networks for typical tasks of a legal researcher, and selective analysis of open materials illustrating risks and practices of AI use. The article presents examples of interactions between the researcher and a generative artificial intelligence system, serving as illustrative material for the formulation of prompts and the analysis of AI-generated responses across various stages in the preparation of a legal scholarly article. The article demonstrates that AI can significantly reduce the time needed to search and analyze large volumes of legal information and to bring the formal quality of a manuscript (structure, style, fact-checking) in line with high editorial standards, but that AI-generated output remains only an intermediate, auxiliary product that must be verified against primary sources and checked for the correctness of terminology and context (especially when translating from one language into another). Particular attention is paid to the uncertainty and potential error in empirical material compiled with AI assistance (for example, when aggregating cross-jurisdictional data on AI in courts), as well as to the dangers of uncritical reliance on automatically generated content. The conclusion argues that AI should be treated as an instrument supporting and …
creator: Valentina V. Stepanova
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Stepanova V.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 250
ending page: 273
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-250-273

Methodological Issues in Socio-Legal Research on the Rule of Law
type: item
description: The global debate on the rule of law is undergoing a methodological crisis in empirical research, manifested in problems of operationalization, cultural bias in indices, and a persistent gap between formal institutions and actual practices. This article aims to trace the evolution of approaches to the rule of law in legal sociology, identify the methodological limitations of three successive “generations” of studies, and outline prospects for synthetic methodology. The analysis draws on key works in socio-legal studies (R. Abel, M. Galanter, M. Hertogh, N. Cheesman, T. Ginsburg) and on a critical reading of global index methodologies (World Justice Project, Worldwide Governance Indicators). Methodologically, it employs historical-sociological and comparative-legal approaches. The first generation of empirical research - classic “gap studies” - demonstrated the systemic failure of legal reforms that ignore the social context, revealing the divergence between official legal norms and everyday normative orders. The second generation, centered on quantitative indices, made the rule of law measurable across countries but produced new difficulties, including expert dependence, data endogeneity, and the risk that governments use indicators to simulate reform rather than constrain power. The third generation, associated with ethnography and studies of legal consciousness, demonstrated the cultural embeddedness and plurality of legal meanings, while also exposing the challenges of aggregating and generalizing qualitative findings for comparative assessment. Overcoming the current methodological impasse requires a multi-dimensional research design that integrates quantitative assessment of institutions, qualitative analysis of legal consciousness, and everyday legality, and sustained theoretical reflections on law’s relationship to power. Such an interdisciplinary program should focus not on abstract rankings, but on the concrete ways in which arbitrary power is constrained (…
creator: Ruslan M. Allalyev
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Allalyev R.M. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-07-06
publication date: 2026-07-06
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 274
ending page: 288
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-274-288

International Legal Regime: Theoretical Foundations and Contemporary Structure in the Context of Globalization
type: item
description: The progressive development of international legal regulation mechanisms across diverse domains of public relations, coupled with the expanding participation of non-state actors in shaping the international agenda, has fostered the emergence of distinct branches of interstate cooperation. This evolution presents a doctrinal challenge in conceptualizing these autonomous spheres, leading to the widespread scholarly adoption of the term “international legal regime”. Despite its utility, Russian international legal doctrine lacks a comprehensive study systematically examining the substantive nature and scope of application of this concept. The article examines the concept and essence of the international legal regime as a key element of the contemporary international legal system. It traces the evolution of theoretical approaches to defining “regime” in international relations, international law, and legal theory, with primary focus on the formation and functioning of international legal regimes amid globalization and fragmentation of international law. The analysis employs a multifaceted methodological framework, encompassing historical genesis, theoretical conceptualization, case studies, and systemic modeling. The historical-legal method traces the evolution of international legal regimes in the context of globalization and fragmentation. The study posits that specialized, functionally autonomous regimes - in domains such as environmental protection, international trade, human rights - emerge as responses to the growing complexity of regulated subject matter and the imperative for tailored mechanisms to address transnational challenges. Comparative legal analysis juxtaposes definitional approaches across domestic and foreign doctrines, while formal juridical methods yield precise definitions, classifications, and structural components of international legal regimes.
creator: Aslan Kh. Abashidze
creator: Vladislav S. Malichenko
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Abashidze A.K., Malichenko V.S. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 289
ending page: 309
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-289-309

International Legal Mechanism for Legitimizing the Military Operation of the United States and its Allies in Syria: Implications for Russia’s International Legal Policy
type: item
description: Given the increasingly adversarial character of states’ international legal positions, a detailed case study of the development and implementation of mechanisms used by foreign states (primarily the United States) to legitimize armed incursions into foreign territory appears timely and warranted. Such an inquiry is relevant both for enriching Russian legal scholarship and for stimulating the development of innovative approaches aimed at improving the quality of Russia’s international legal policy, including the international legal support of the special military operation in Ukraine. Analyzing the practice of other states makes it possible to identify patterns that may facilitate the prediction of their future international legal maneuvers and to reveal weaknesses and inconsistencies that should be avoided domestically and, where appropriate, used strategically to influence the currently prevailing pro-Western international legal consciousness. The purpose of this article is to identify and reconstruct the content of the international legal mechanism used to legitimize the military operation conducted by the United States and its allies in Syria. The research materials consist of international and national documents, international legal literature, and relevant media sources. Methodologically, the study employs an integrative approach, drawing on methods of legal construction, analogy, institutional analysis, and legal modeling. The analysis suggests that, since 2014, the United States has relied on three principal sets of arguments to defend the lawfulness of the use of force in Syria, elaborated at different stages of the conflict: (1) humanitarian intervention and the associated “responsibility to protect” (R2P) discourse; (2) the right to (collective) self-defense; and (3) “anticipatory (preemptive) humanitarian intervention”. The development and refinement of these argument clusters have been underpinned by a large range of inventive international legal constru…
creator: Anastasia M. Korzhenyak
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Korzhenyak A.M. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 310
ending page: 330
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-310-330

DNA Fingerprinting and Genetic Privacy in Algerian and French Law: A Comparative Study
type: item
description: The purpose of this study is to examine the role of DNA fingerprinting in establishing paternity and its application as evidence in criminal proceedings, alongside the legal and ethical challenges of protecting genetic privacy. It analyzes the evolution of the Algerian judicial system and the development of legal frameworks for resolving paternity disputes, including the influence of traditional kinship recognition methods on adopting modern scientific techniques like DNA fingerprinting. In criminal investigations, DNA fingerprinting have proven highly effective for identifying perpetrators, enhancing investigative accuracy, and promoting fairer justice administration. However, its use raises complex legal and ethical concerns regarding potential misuse of genetic data. The study concludes that a balanced legislative approach is essential to safeguard personal rights while preserving DNA fingerprinting as a reliable evidentiary tool, without undermining core privacy principles. It further proposes legislative solutions that meet justice requirements in paternity and criminal cases, incorporating stringent safeguards against genetic privacy violations.
creator: Yekhlef Abdelkader
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Abdelkader Y. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 331
ending page: 348
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-331-348

Regulation of Digital Assets in the Commonwealth of Australia in the Context of Bankruptcy Estate Formation
type: item
description: The article examines the legal regulation of digital assets in Australia, with particular emphasis on their status within bankruptcy procedures. The study’s relevance stems from rapid technological advncements, the surging popularity of digital assets, and persistent challenges in regulating their turnover, including under insolvency law. The objective is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of Australia’s current regulatory framework for digital assets, their legal nature, and their inclusion in the bankruptcy estate. The research employs comparative-legal, formal-legal, and systemic methods, drawing on Australian legislation, judicial practice, regulatory guidance, and scholarly works from domestic and foreign sources. Analysis reveals that Australia adopts a permissive regulatory model for digital assets - encompassing digital rights and currencies - with indirect regulation via analogous norms and agency recommendations, absent specialized legislation. In bankruptcy contexts, judicial practice and doctrine classify digital assets as property includable in the bankruptcy estate. Australian insolvency law equips trustees with mechanisms to identify, seize, and manage such assets, supported by targeted guidance.
creator: Stanislav V. Odintsov
creator: Maria S. Gribanowskaya
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Odintsov S.V., Gribanowskaya M.S. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 349
ending page: 364
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-349-364

Modern approaches of foreign countries to admitting foreign investments into the national economy
type: item
description: Since 2022, the Russian economy has faced new challenges arising from intensified sanctions pressure. The protective countermeasures introduced by Russia have significantly affected the operations of foreign investors. This raises the question of whether these measures are excessive or, conversely, consistent with the investment-regulatory policies of other states aimed at attracting foreign capital. The article examines the conditions under which foreigners are admitted to the national economies of the United States and the European Union - both of which pursue sanctions policies toward Russia - as well as of countries under U.S. and EU economic sanctions, including China and Iran. The similarity of national-security and strategic interests in the current historical context allows for the identification of common features and specific characteristics in the legal regulation of foreign investment. The study employs general-scientific methods (analysis and synthesis) as well as special legal methods (formal-legal and comparative-legal analysis). The findings indicate that the legal systems considered establish different conditions and procedures for state control over foreign investment, reflecting the peculiarities of each national legal order. The underlying objectives of restricting foreign presence, however, are broadly similar: ensuring national defense and state security and protecting the country from external and internal threats. The sectors of economic activity subject to foreign-investment control are determined by each state according to its geopolitical environment and level of economic development.
creator: Olesya V. Milchakova
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Milchakova O.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 365
ending page: 380
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-365-380

Ideological sources of civil law: Axiological measurement of civil society regulatory mechanisms
type: item
description: The Russian civil law serves as the foundation for the formation of sustainable social models and for strengthening the state’s political positions. An insufficient understanding of the axiological principles underpinning legal structures impedes the development of civil society and the modernization of sociopolitical relations. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the fundamental provisions of the axiological nature of civil law, taking into account ontological, anthropological, and phenomenological principles. This conceptual clarification is intended to create a basis for aligning the exising state of civil law with public expectations regarding sustainable sociopolitical development. The integration of sociological and axiological methods makes it possible to systematize civil law as a system of value-laden structures within society. The comparative-legal approach provides the framework for critical analysis and comparative assessment of different types of legal thought in the process of refining the principles of civil law. Within the tradition of continental law, the domestic legal system is characterized as a normative dogma operating on the principles of positive law. The dominance of this positivist-oriented approach tends to overestimate the role of statutory legislation grounded in a pragmatic methodology, justified by the recognition of positivist legal principles as the primary source of civil law. At the same time, natural law remains an integral component of legal thought, and its effectiveness is evident throughout the historical development of legal systems. The close interconnection between legal dogma and legal history confirms the significance of the axiological dimention and comparative methodology. Until now, however, these approaches have remained largely confined to commentary on the Russian legal system, which restricts the further evolution of civil law. The modernization of state-body operations and civil law institutions becomes po…
creator: Ekaterina S. Alekhina
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Alekhina E.S. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 381
ending page: 394
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-381-394

The right to disconnect or the right to offline as a restriction of the employer’s rights
type: item
description: The article examines the right to disconnect from the standpoint of the legal structure of restrictions in labor law. The author classifies existing foreign-country models of the right to disconnect according to two main criteria: (a) the method of regulating the “right to disconnect”, and (b) the scope of subject coverage. Drawing on a broad range of scientific literature, judicial practice, statistical data, and provisions of foreign legislation, and applying formal-legal and comparative-legal methods, the author formulates and analyses the structural elements of the right to disconnect as a restriction on the employer’s rights. These elements include the composition of the rights-holders, the form of implementation of the right, the procedure and grounds for the employer’s refusal to assist the employee in exercising this right, as well as mechanisms for ensuring its effective exercise (both punitive and preventive measures). Based on the research findings, the article proposes ways to improve the current Russian legislation on the legal regulation of the right to disconnect.
creator: Levan G. Dzhidzhavadze
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Dzhidzhavadze L.G. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 395
ending page: 407
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-395-407

Debureaucratization of Higher Education in Russia: Legislative Innovations, Organizational Challenges, International Experience
type: item
description: The article examines the legal and practical aspects of implementing Federal Law N 328-FZ aimed at reducing the bureaucratic burden on the teaching staff in Russian higher education institutions. Despite the good intentions of the legislators, the practical implementation of the new norms faces a number of legal conflicts and organizational challenges. The article aims to comprehensively analyze the potential and risks of implementing Federal Law N 328-FZ, identify legal and practical barriers to the debureaucratization of higher education, and develop recommendations for optimizing the regulatory framework and organizational mechanisms for reducing the bureaucratic burden on teaching staff. The study relies on an analysis of the text of Federal Law N 328-FZ, comparing its provisions with current educational and labor legislation and bylaws. The methods of legal, comparative, and institutional analysis, as well as the synthesis of theoretical and empirical data, are used. As a result of the study, key contradictions between the new law and the existing regulatory framework are identified, and practical difficulties in implementing the requirements of the law in the context of the existing university management system are shown. The international experience of debureaucratization of higher education is analyzed, and recommendations for improving Russian legislation and organizational practices are proposed. The implementation of Federal Law N 328-FZ requires comprehensive work on harmonizing the regulatory framework, transforming management processes, and introducing digital document management technologies. Only a balanced combination of legal and organizational innovations will make it possible to achieve a real reduction in the bureaucratic burden in higher education. The results obtained contribute to the understanding of the complex processes of reforming the higher education system and contribute to the development of a balanced approach to solving the problem …
creator: Andrei V. Druzhinin
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Druzhinin A.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 408
ending page: 424
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-408-424

Organizational, Legal Regulation and Maintenance of State Fingerprint Registration in the Republic of Kazakhstan
type: item
description: The abstract examines the legal and organizational foundations for the introduction of state fingerprint registration in the Republic of Kazakhstan, with a focus on the material and technical aspects of its implementation. The aim of the study is to identify and systematize the legal, organizational, and technical dimentions of mandatory fingerprint registration in Kazakhstan, and to assess the potential for applying Russian experience in this field. The author emphasizes that fingerprint identification is one of the key tools for strengthening national and public security, enabling the timely identification of individuals who may pose a potential threat, as well as improving the effectiveness of law enforcement activities and border control. The application of analytical, synthetic, systematization, and comparative-legal methods made it possible to identify the specific features of the implementation of state fingerprint registration in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The paper examines the competences of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the National Security Committee, the Ministry of Transport, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which jointly form a comprehensive infrastructure for the organization and management of the fingerprint registration process. Technical aspects are considered separately, including the advantages of digital inkless fingerprinting stations. It is emphasized that the effective functioning of systems for the collection, processing, and storage of fingerprint information requires modern hardware and software complexes, as well as cryptographic methods for protecting biometric data, aimed at minimizing the risk of unauthorized access. In addition, the article analyzes the Russian experience of mandatory dactyloscopic registration of foreigners, which helps to assess the prospects for improving Kazakhstan’s legislation and practice in introducing such mechanisms, as well as to identify potential problems. As a result, the study provides a holis…
creator: Nikita Britvak
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Britvak N. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 425
ending page: 444
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-425-444

XIII All-Russian Annual Meeting of Legal Theorists ‘Modern Theoretical Orientations of Legal Science’: Dedicated to the 85th Anniversary of Valery V. Lazarev
type: item
description: -
creator: Valentina S. Nikitina
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Nikitina V.S. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 445
ending page: 450
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-445-450

Review of the lecture: A.V. Fedorov “Criminal Liability of Legal Entities as a New Direction in the Development of Foreign Legislation”, Law Institute of RUDN University, Moscow, March 6, 2026
type: item
description: -
creator: Olga A. Kuznetsova
creator: Lev R. Klebanov
rights: Copyright (c) 2026 Kuznetsova O.A., Klebanov L.R. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
date: 2026-06-30
publication date: 2026-06-30
volume: 30
number: 2
starting page: 451
ending page: 456
doi: 10.22363/2313-2337-2026-30-2-451-456