Cross-border aspects of administrative protection of intellectual property: a survey of Russian court practice

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The importance of studying the protection of intellectual property rights in the face of modern challenges and threats, changes in Russia’s economic paradigm, and the search for new competitive advantages in the global economy is undisputed. The article aims to analyze the selected cross-border aspects of the administrative protection of intellectual property based on a review of Russian judicial practice. In this research, the formal-legal, comparative-legal, historical methods, as well as method of system analysis of the judiciary acts are used. The analysis of judicial practice in administrative cases related to intellectual property identified by the customs authorities reveals several problem areas. These issues include the competence of customs authorities in implementing customs control of goods containing intellectual property items, the use of expert procedures, the participation of the right holder in such litigation, and the exhaustion of intellectual property rights in the context of sanctions against Russia. Regarding the competence of customs authorities in the field of administrative protection of intellectual property rights, clear limits of such competence are defined, particularly in relation to the cross-border movement of goods under customs control. It is concluded that customs protection of intellectual property is limited to part of the intellectual property during cross-border movement. The article emphasizes the significant role of expert procedures in administrative cases related to intellectual property involving customs authorities. Arguments are presented against the use of opinions issued by copyright holders, and the participation of the copyright holder in the administrative protection of exclusive rights in the cross-border movement of goods is assessed. Special attention is paid to the principle of rights exhaustion and its implementation in judicial practice, particularly in the context of strengthening the sanctions regime against Russia and the partial legalization of parallel imports. The article concludes that cross-border protection of intellectual rights is positioned as an element of the entire system of legal protection of intellectual rights.

About the authors

Saniyat A. Agamagomedova

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: saniyat_aga@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8265-2971

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Sector of Administrative Law and Administrative Procedure

10 Znamenka str., Moscow, 119019, Russian Federation

References

  1. Belykh, V.S. & Panova, A.S. (2023) Parallel import as an economic and legal category. Lawyer. (3), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2023-3-34-40 (in Russian).
  2. Bogdanova, E. (2013) Exhaustion of the right to a trademark as a special type of termination of exclusive rights. Intellectual Property. Industrial property. (3), 17-24. (in Russian).
  3. Calboli, I. (2022) Intellectual Property Exhaustion and Parallel Imports of Pharmaceuticals: A Comparative and Critical Review. In: Correa, C.M. & Hilty, R.M. (eds.). Access to Medicines and Vaccines. Springer, Cham. pp. 31-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83114-1_2
  4. Celli, A.L. & Hyzik, M. (2001) The Swiss Federal Supreme Court Rejects International Exhaustion in Patent Law. Eur Bus Org Law Rev. (2), 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752900000380
  5. Dorofeev, V.D. & Glushchenko, V.V. (2021) Problems of protecting intellectual property rights during customs control after the release of goods. IS. Industrial property. (11), 41-46. (in Russian).
  6. Gavrilov, E.P. (2018) The principle of exhaustion of exclusive rights and its interpretation in the Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Economy and Law. (5) (496), 36-46. (in Russian).
  7. Gavrilov, E.P. (2020) The principle of exhaustion of the exclusive right and the right to selection achievement. Economy and Law. (7) (522), 69-75. (in Russian).
  8. Godt, C. (2023). How to Stay Modern Feudalism? Comparing EU and US Methodologies in Containing Post-Sale Restraints by Way of IP Exhaustion. In: Godt, C. & Lamping, M. (eds.). A Critical Mind. MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law. Vol. 30. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65974-8_12
  9. Grigoriadis, L.G. (2014). Exhaustion of Trademark Rights and Legality of Parallel Imports Under the GATT 1994. In: Trade Marks and Free Trade. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04795-9_4
  10. Ivanov, A.Yu. & Voinikanis, E.A. (eds.). (2021) Patent law, alive and dead. Ivanov, A.Yu., Voynikanis, E.A. & Sivitsky, V.A., et al. National research University “Higher School of Economics”. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics. (in Russian).
  11. Nowak, C. (ed.). (2021) Combatting Illicit Trade on the EU Border. Comparative Perspective. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51019-0
  12. Pathak, V. (2018) Intellectual Property Rights and Parallel Trade: Debate on National Versus International Exhaustion of Rights. In: Nirmal, B. & Singh, R. (eds.). Contemporary Issues in International Law. Springer, Singapore. pp. 347-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6277-3_24
  13. Pirogova, V.V. (2008) Exhaustion of exclusive rights and parallel imports. Moscow. 155 p. (in Russian).
  14. Pirogova, V.V. (2012) TRIPS Agreement (WTO): exhaustion of rights and parallel imports. State and Law. (6), 119-122. (in Russian).
  15. Saidashev, R.Z. (2021) The influence of the principle of exhaustion of the exclusive right to a trademark on the state of competition in commodity markets. Russian Competition Law and Economics. (2), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2021-2-26-36-41 (in Russian).
  16. Sergeev, A.P. (2004) Intellectual property rights in the Russian Federation: Textbook. 2nd ed., revised. Moscow, TK Welby, Prospect Publ. (in Russian).
  17. Shalimova, L.Yu. (2017) Consequences of liberalization of parallel imports in Russia. Economics and business: theory and practice. (11), 213-216. (in Russian).
  18. Steppe, R. (2019) Belgium. In: Këllezi, P., Kilpatrick, B. & Kobel, P. (eds.). Liability for Antitrust Law Infringements & Protection of IP Rights in Distribution. LIDC Contributions on Antitrust Law, Intellectual Property and Unfair Competition. Springer, Cham. pp. 365-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17550-4_16
  19. Tyunin, M.V., Eremeeva, N.V. & Nabiev, S.R. (2023) Parallel import as a tool for managing international sanctions. IS. Industrial property. (3), 58-65. (in Russian).
  20. Yang, H. & Song, H. (2023). Intellectual Property Protection in Free Trade Zones: Main Issues from China’s Perspective in the International Context. In: Zhang, L. & Tan, X. (eds.). A Chinese Perspective on WTO Reform. Springer, Singapore. pp. 59-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8230-9_3

Copyright (c) 2024 Agamagomedova S.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies