International Legal Regulation of Genetic Research and Implementation of International Legal Standards in this sphere into Russian Legislation
- Authors: Kubyshkin A.V.1,2, Kosilkin S.V.2
-
Affiliations:
- Advocate’s Office “SanctaLex” (N 36) of the Moscow City Bar Association
- Scientific Collaboration “Legal Genomics Developments Alliance (LeGenDA)”
- Issue: Vol 25, No 1 (2021): BIOMEDICINE AND LAW
- Pages: 107-125
- Section: GENETICS AND LAW
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/view/26038
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2021-25-1-107-125
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article analyzes the topical issues of international legal regulation of genetic research; it provides a comparative analysis of two groups of international acts regulating relations related to genetic research and application of their results on creation, use and circulation of genetically modified organisms (except humans), on the study of human genome and application of their results. The article deals with the issues of objects and methods of genetic research regulation, balance of interests as the basis for legal regulation of public relations in the field of genomic research. It also considers approaches to ensuring a balance of private, group and common (public) interests. Criticism of certain provisions of the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine is given, the question of the inadmissibility of legal opposition between the protection of human rights and the interests of science and society as a whole is raised. The authors put forward proposals on the implementation of a number of international norms in Russian legislation and its further improvement, as well as on the use of blockchain technology in genetic research.
About the authors
Aleksey V. Kubyshkin
Advocate’s Office “SanctaLex” (N 36) of the Moscow City Bar Association; Scientific Collaboration “Legal Genomics Developments Alliance (LeGenDA)”
Author for correspondence.
Email: a.kubyshkin@gmail.com
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Partner, Scientific Collaboration “Legal Genomics Developments Alliance (LeGenDA)”, Lawyer, Advocate’s Office “SanctaLex” (N 36) of the Moscow City Bar Association
2/1 house building 4 Talalikhina str., Moscow, 109147, Russian FederationSergey V. Kosilkin
Scientific Collaboration “Legal Genomics Developments Alliance (LeGenDA)”
Email: kosilkins@mail.ru
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Expert, Scientific Collaboration “Legal Genomics Developments Alliance (LeGenDA)”
17/136 Vilnius str., Moscow, 117574, Russian FederationReferences
- Bekyashev, K.A. & Khodakov, А.G. (1996) International public law. Collection of documents. In two volumes. Vol. 2. Moscow, BEK Publ. (in Russian).
- Bekyashev, K.A. (1997) The role of the UN in the codification and progressive development of international environmental law. Proceedings of the Orenburg Institute (branch) of the Moscow State Law Academy. (1), 146-152. (in Russian).
- Belyaev, A.M., et al. (2018) Blockchain in Health Care: Opportunities for use in Clinical Trials. Lechebnoye delo. (2), 100-105. (in Russian).
- Doronina, O.D., Levitskaja, A.B. (2006) Principle “Precaution Measures Adoption” Role in Human Health Environmental Safety Guaranteeing. Bulletin of the Scientific Council “Medical and Ecological Problems of Working People”. (2), 18-24. (in Russian).
- Fedotova, V.V., Emelyanov, B.G. & Tipner, L.M. (2018) The concept of blockchain and the possibilities of its use. EUROPEAN SCIENCE. 1 (33), 40-48. (in Russian).
- Fogarty, Norah, M.E.; McCarthy, Afshan; Snijders, Kirsten E.; Powell, Benjamin E.; Kubikova, Nada; Blakeley, Paul; Lea, Rebecca; Elder, Kay; Wamaitha, Sissy E. (2017). “Genome editing reveals a role for OCT4 in human embryogenesis”. Nature. 550 (7674), 67-73.
- Hodge, S. (2018) Current Controversies in the Use of DNA in Forensic Investigations. University of Baltimore Law Review. 48(1), Article 3. Available from: https://scholarworks.law. ubalt.edu/ublr/vol48/iss1/3 [Accessed 1st December 2020].
- Hokanson, K.E. (2019) When Policy Meets Practice: The Dilemma for Guidance on Risk Assessment Under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. (7), 82. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00082.
- Kalinichenko, P.A. (2019) Development of Court Practice in Cases Involving Human Genomics: World Experience and Russia. Lex Russica. 6(151), 30-36. (in Russian).
- Kalinichenko, P.A. (2003) International environmental law. Globalistics: An Encyclopedia. Moscow, Raduga Publ. (in Russian).
- Kalinichenko, P.A. & Nechaeva, E.K. (2019) Legal regulation of research and development in the field of the human genome and their practical use: Russia's experience based on international standards. International Legal Courier. 2 (19), 25-28. (in Russian).
- Kalinichenko, P.A. & Ponomareva, D.V. (2019) Ethical and legal aspects of regulating genomic research in international and Russian practice. Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety. 5 (64), 69-70. (in Russian).
- Kosarenko, N.N. (2007) The category “interest” in the system of public and private law. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. (3), 157-162. (in Russian)
- Kovalev, Yu.Yu., Stepanov, A.V. & Burnasov, A.S. (2019) International Policy for the Protection and Use of Biological Diversity in the World: Goals, Stages of Development, Problems of Implementation. Bulletin of the Ural Federal University. Social Sciences. 4(194), 119- 133. (in Russian).
- Kodyleva, T.A., Kirillova, A.O., Tyschik, E.A., Makarov, V.V., Khromov, A.V. & Guschin, V.A., et al. (2018) The efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated induction of the CCR5Delta32 mutation in the human embryo. Bulletin of the Russian State Medical University. (4), 80-83. doi: 10.24075/vrgmu.2018.052. (in Russian).
- Kubyshkin, A.V., Kosilkin, S.V. & Astrelina, T.A. (2019) International legal regulation of genetic research, biobanking, bioinformatics and human reproduction: analysis of the main international legal acts. International legal courier. (2), 29-34. (in Russian).
- Machado, H. & Silva, S. (2019) What influences public views on forensic DNA testing in the criminal field? A scoping review of quantitative evidence. Hum Genomics. 13(1), 23. doi: 10.1186/s40246-019-0207-5.
- McHughen, A. (2006) Problems with the Cartagena Protocol. Аsiabiotech. 10(12), 684-687. Doi.org/10.1142/S0219030306000942.
- Montgomery, J. (2018) Modification of the Human Genome: Challenges from the Human Rights Sphere due to Scientific and Technological Advances. Precedents of the European Court of Human Rights. 3(51), 42-56. (in Russian).
- Nagrodskaya, V.B. (2019) New technologies (blockchain / artificial intelligence) in the service of law: scientific and methodological manual. Novoselova L.A. (ed.). Moscow, Prospect Publ. (in Russian).
- Nwawuba, St.U, Mohammed, Kh.A, Bukola, A.T., Omusi P.I. & Ayevbuomwan Davidson, E. (2020) Forensic DNA Profiling: Autosomal Short Tandem Repeat as a Prominent Marker in Crime Investigation. Malays J Med Sci. 27(4), 22-35. doi: 10.21315/mjms2020.27.4.3
- Samuel, G. & Prainsack, B. (2018) The regulatory landscape of forensic DNA phenotyping in Europe VISAGE. London, King’s College London. Available from: http://www.visage-h2020.eu/PDF/ Deliverable_5.1_for_posting_online_DECEMBER_2018.pdf [Accessed 21th November 2020].
- Sergeev, Yu.D., Mokhov, A.A. & Yavorskiy, A.N. (2019) Pilot (experimental) legal regime for national biomedical science and practice. Medical Law. (4), 3-13. (in Russian).
- Schegoleva, A. M. (2014) Elaboration and adoption of the Cartagena Protocol on biosafety 2000: travaux préparatoires. RUDN Journal of Law. (2), 300-310. (in Russian).
- Watson, J.D., Davis, K. & Berry, A. (2019) DNA. History of the genetic revolution. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ. (in Russian).