Cover Page

Cite item


Unconstitutional change of power in Ukraine as a result of the "Maidan revolution" in February 2014, with the subsequent power grab by Ukrainian radicals of local authorities under nationalist slogans, led to the establishment of control over parts of the territory of Donetsk and Lugansk regions by Donbass militias, and then to the ongoing fighting between the armed formations of the latter with units of the regular armed forces of Ukraine. The purpose of this publication is to establish the form of the armed conflict and its legal consequences from the standpoint of current international law, which has not yet found proper legal analysis and coverage in either domestic or foreign (including Ukrainian) legal doctrinе. In official statements and legislative acts of Ukraine, this conflict is declared as a "state of war with Russia", "aggression of Russia", and the Ukrainian doctrine of international law almost unanimously declares the need to apply to the conflict the norms of international humanitarian law and qualifies it as an international armed conflict. In this publication, on the basis of the analysis of existing international legal norms and legal doctrine, the qualification of existing forms of armed conflicts is carried out: war, international armed conflict, non-international armed conflict, internationalized armed conflict. This examines the legal consequences (or otherwise the obligations of the parties to the conflict) that are caused by each form of such armed conflict, that is concealed and ignored by the Ukrainian side. On the basis of the theoretical and legal analysis of the UN Charter, the relevant provisions of the Geneva conventions on the protection of victims of war of 1949 and Additional protocols I and II of 1977, the author qualifies the situation in the South-East of Ukraine as a non-international armed conflict and the obligation to comply with applicable legal norms by all parties to the conflict. At the same time, the author comes to the conclusion about the insolvency of the claims about the applicability of the rules governing other mentioned forms of armed conflicts.

About the authors

Petr P. Kremnev

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of International Law, Faculty of Law

13, b.1, Leninskie gory, 119991, Moscow, Russia


  1. Aliev, Sh.M. (2015) Legal effects of the outbreak and termination of international armed conflict. Eurasian Law Journal (8), 47–53. (in Russian).
  2. Artsibasov, I.N. (1975) International Law: Laws and Customs. Moscow: Military institute Publ. (in Russian).
  3. Batyr', V.M. (2011) International Humanitarian Law. Moscow: Justitsinform Publ. (in Russian). Батырь В.М. Международное гуманитарное правo: учебник для вузов. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: Юстицинформ, 2011. 689 с.
  4. Borgen, C. (2014) From Intervention to Recognition: Russia, Crimea, and Arguments over Recognizing Secessionist Entities, available at: [Aсcessed May 26th 2019].
  5. Cassese, A. (2004) The Special Court and International Law: The Decision Concerning the Lome Agreement Amnesty. Journal of International Criminal Justice. Vol. 2. (4), 1130–1140.
  6. David, E. (2000) Principles of the Law of Armed Conflicts. Moscow. ICRC Publ. (in Russian).
  7. Dinstein, Y. (2011) War, Aggression and Self-Defence. 5th ed. Cambridge University Press. Egorov, S.A. (2000) Kosovo Crisis and the Law of Armed Conflicts. International Red Cross: Collection of Articles. (837), 25–34. (in Russian).
  8. Egorov, S.A. (2003) Armed Conflicts and International Law. Moscow: Diplomatic Academy of the MFA of Russia Publ. (in Russian).
  9. Gasser, H-P. (1983) Intenationalised non-international armed conflicts: Case studies of Afghanistan, Kampuchea and Lebanon. American University Law review. Vol. 33. 145–161.
  10. Gasser, H-P. (1993) Humanitarian Standards for Internal Strife — A Brief Review of New Developments. International Review of the Red Cross. 33 (294), 221–226. Doi: 10.1017/S0020860400076981.
  11. Gnatovsky, M.M. (2014), Interaction of international humanitarian law and international human rights law during counter-Terrorism and Operational activities in the Eastern regions of Ukraine. Ukrainian revolution of hygiene, aggression of the Russian Federation and international law in the Order Oleksandr Zadorozhny. Kyiv, 779–801. (in Ukrainian).
  12. Greenwood, C. (1987) The Concept of War in Modern International Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Vol. 36. (2). 283–306.
  13. Kolb, R. and Hyde, R. (2008) An Introduction to the International Law and Armed Conflicts. 3th ed.Hart Publishing. Oxford.
  14. Kotlyarov, I.I. (2013) International legal regulation of armed conflicts (basic theoretical problems and practice). Moscow: Jurlitinform Publ. (in Russian).
  15. Kotlyarov, I.I., Puzyreva, J.V. (2014) Ukrainian Armed conflict and international law. Vestnik Moscovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. (10), 265–271. (in Russian).
  16. Kremnev, P.P. (2016) Applicability of legal norms to the armed conflict in Syria and the attack on Russian pilots of the downed SU-24. Legislation. (7), 79–86. (in Russian).
  17. Lobanov, S.A. (2015) Armed conflict in South-Eastern Ukraine: assessment from the point of view of international law. Vyzovy globalnogo mira. Vestnik IMTP. [The challenges of global peace. Vestnik IMTP] 1 (5), 62–74. (in Russian).
  18. McNair, L., Watts, A.D. (1966) The Legal Effects of War. Cambridge Univer. Press.
  19. Merezhko, O. (2015) Crimea's Annexation by Russia — Contradictions of the New Russian Doctrine of International Law. Available at: http://knlu-kiev.acа (Accessed 26 May 2019).
  20. Poltorak, A.I., Savinskiy, L.I. (1976) Armed Conflicts and International Law. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (in Russian).
  21. Silven, V. (2009) Typology of armed conflicts in international humanitarian law: legal concepts and real situations. International Review of the Red Cross. Vol. 91. No 873, 91–126. (in Russian).
  22. Schindler, D. (1982) International humanitarian law and internationalized internal armed conflict. International Review of the Red Cross. 22 (230), 255–264.
  23. Shany, Y. (2015) Does International Law Grant the People of Crimea and Donetsk a Right to Secede? Revisiting Self-Determination in Light of the 2014 Events in Ukraine, available at: (Accessed 14 June 2019).
  24. Shirmammadov, K. (2016) How Does the International Community Reconcile the Principles of Territorial Integrity and Self-Determination? The Case of Crimea. Russian Law Journal. Vol. 4. (1).
  25. Stewart, G.G. (2003) Towards a single definition of armed conflict in international humanitarian law: analysis of internationalized armed conflict. International Journal of the Red Cross: Collection of Articles (849–852), 129–175. (in Russian).
  26. Swinarski, С. (1984) Studies and Essays on International humanitarian law and Red Cross Principles of Jean Pictet. Geneva. ICRC.
  27. Zadorozhniy, O.V. (2014) International legal principle of nonuse of force or threat of force in the context of actions of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. Pravova derzhava. Constitutional state. Pravovoe gosudarstvo. Odesa. Feniks. (8), 129–134. (in Ukrainian).
  28. Zadorozhniy, O.V. (2015) Russian doctrine of international law after the annexation of Crimea. Kiev. K.I.S. Publ. (in Russian).
  29. Zadorozhniy, O.V. (2017) The violations of the principle of sovereign equality of states in Russia’s aggressive war against Ukraine. Almanac of international law. Topical problems of international law. 7. Odesa. 3–19. (in Ukrainian).

Copyright (c) 2019 Kremnev P.P.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies