“Europeanization” of Think Tanks in the EU Interest Group Politics

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

The article reveals the characteristics of think tanks as actors of the interest group politics in the European Union (EU). In this policy, they inspire public debate, conduct research, encourage new legislation and more effective public administration. A large number of European think tanks is engaged in interest group politics both at the national and supranational level of the EU governance, encouraging integration processes among the EU countries and Europeanization, which is the subject of analysis of this study. The strengthening of the role and importance of interest groups in EU policy is largely due to the increased power of the Union’s institutions, since the introduction of new legislation and regulation common to all EU countries leads to the feedback from various groups that represent both public and private interests. Obviously, these groups, when interacting with the power institutions of the EU, strive for the most effective protection of their interests. For this purpose their representatives hold meetings with officials of the European Commission and the European Parliament, as well as other structures of the Union. This interaction, aiming at promoting their interests by means of lobbying and advocacy, has been regulated since 2011 by the Transparency Register, jointly created by the European Commission and the European Parliament. The purpose of this study is to analyze the quantitative performance of think tanks in the EU and to develop on its basis the Ranking of EU countries, according to the level of Europeanization of the think tanks representing them. From the research methods perspective, the study is based on the matching of statistical data from the Transparency Register and the Global Go To Think Tank Index, which serves the basis for this Ranking. The study of the ranking makes it possible to identify groups of countries with a high, medium and low level of Europeanization of think tanks in all EU countries as of January 31, 2019. The results revealed on the basis of the analysis demonstrate the heterogeneous nature of the Europeanization process of think tanks in different EU countries.

作者简介

Ivan Pisarev

Far Eastern Federal University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: pinoy@mail.ru

Faculty Member, Department of Pacific Asia of the Institute of Oriental Studies - School of Regional and International Studies

Vladivostok, Russian Federation

参考

  1. Abelson, D. (2005). Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Belyaeva, N.Yu., & Zaitsev, D.G. (2008). Think Tanks and Public Policy Centers as Subjects of Expert Policy Support. Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia, 4(51), 139—151. (In Russian).
  3. Beyers, J. (2009). Multilevel Venue-Shopping in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Interest Organizations in Four EU Member-States. European Union Studies Association (EUSA). 11th Biennial Conference, 23—25 April. URL: http://aei.pitt.edu/33028/1/beyers._jan.pdf (accessed: 31.01.2019).
  4. Boucher, S., & Hobbs, B. (2004). Europe and Its Think Tanks, a Promise to Be Fulfilled: An Analysis of Think Tanks Specialized in European Policy Issues in the Enlarged European Union. Notre Europe: Studies and Research, (35), 1—160.
  5. Coen, D. (2007). Empirical and Theoretical Studies in EU Lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 333—345. doi: 10.1080/13501760701243731
  6. Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2013). The Europeanization of Interest Groups: National Associations in Multilevel Europe. European Political Science Association (EPSA). Annual Conference in Barcelona, 20—22 June. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2268605 (accessed: 31.01.2019). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2268605
  7. Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2016). Insiders versus Outsiders: Interest Group Politics in Multilevel Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Gorny, M.B. (2006). Think Tanks and Centers of Public Policy at the End of the 20th — Beginning of the 21st Centuries. Public Policy. Public Policy, 1(1), 62—75. (In Russian).
  9. Kelstrup, J.D. (2016). The Politics of Think Tanks in Europe. London; New York, NY: Routledge.
  10. Kharkevich, M.V. (2016). MGIMO-University in “Go To Think Tanks” 2015 Ranking: Global Trends, Local Responses. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 1(46), 196—201. (In Russian).
  11. Kirchner, E.J. (1980). Interest Group Behaviour at Community Level. In L. Hurwitz (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on European Integration. London: Aldwych (pp. 112—135).
  12. Kröger, S. (2018). The Europeanisation of Interest Groups: Beyond Access, Fit and Resources. Journal of European Integration, 40(1), 17—31. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1345899
  13. Mazey, S., & Richardson, J. (2001). Interest Groups and EU Policy-Making: Organizational Logic and Venue Shopping. In J. Richardson (Eds.), European Union: Power and Policy-Making. London: Routledge (pp. 247—265).
  14. McGann, J., & Sabatini, R. (2010). Global Think Tanks: Policy Networks and Governance. London: Routledge.
  15. Medushevsky, N.A. (2010). Analytical Centers in the Political Process: American Model of Think Tanks and Its Functioning Outside the United States. Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia, 1(56), 118—132. (In Russian).
  16. Peter, J., Semetko, H.A., & De Vreese, C.H. (2003). EU Politics on Television News: A Cross-National Comparative Study. European Union Politics, 3(4), 305—327. doi: 10.1177/14651165030043003
  17. Saurugger, S. (2013). The Europeanization of Interest Groups and Social Movements. In S. Bulmer & C. Lequesne (Eds.), The Member States of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press (рр. 333—356).
  18. Sitnikov, A.P. (2009). Factories of Thought and Independent Centers of Social and Political Activities: Classification and Analysis. Bulletin of the MSRU. Series: Psychology, (4), 186—192. (In Russian).
  19. Stone, D. (2007). Recycling Bins, Garbage Cans or Think Tanks? Three Myths Regarding Policy Analysis Institutes. Public Administration, 2(85), 259—278. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00649.x
  20. Sungurov, A.Yu. (2014). Expert Community, Think Tanks and Power: The Experiences of the Three Russian Regions. Polis. Political Studies, (2), 72—87. (In Russian). doi: 10.17976/jpps/2014.02.06
  21. Sungurov, A.Yu., Raspopov, N.P., & Belyaev, A.Yu. (2012). Mediating Institutions and Their Development in Contemporary Russia. II. Think Tanks and Centers of Public Policy. Polis. Political Studies, (4), 99—116. (In Russian).
  22. Thomas, C.S. (2001). Political Parties and Interest Groups: Shaping Democratic Governance. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  23. Zhurbey, E.V. (2011). “Think tanks” and Foreign Policy of the People’s Republic of China: Background. Ojkumena. Regional Researches, 3(18), 131—139. (In Russian).
  24. Zhurbey, E.V. (2014). “Think Tanks” and Foreign Policy Process of the Singapore: Background. Ojkumena. Regional Researches, 1(28), 100—106. (In Russian).
  25. Zhurbey, E.V. (2017). “The Brookings Institution”: The Success Story of the Oldest “Think Tank”. Ojkumena. Regional Researches, 2(41), 156—168. (In Russian).

补充文件

没有额外的文件显示


版权所有 © Pisarev I.I., 2021

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名-非商业性使用 4.0国际许可协议的许可。

##common.cookie##