China as an Emerging Actor in Conflict Management: from Non-Interference in Internal Affairs to “Constructive” Engagement

Cover Page

Cite item


The need to protect citizens and investments abroad is placing tremendous pressure on China’s traditional foreign policy strategy and noninterference principle. Instability in most of BRI countries form new security conditions, pushing China to be more flexible in engaging in missions it had previously opposed, including political engagement in intrastate conflicts in the developing world. Following the formula “politics is a big economy”, China starts rethinking its security interests. As a result, China has smoothly adopted the transition strategy from non-intervention into internal affairs to a more proactive non-indifference approach, that Chinese academics are describing as “creative” or “constructive” engagement. Many new elements contribute to this new constructive engagement - conceptual narrative, political support, geopolitical competition, growing capacities and new security conditions. The key point of the article is to analyze China’s strategy in defending national interests overseas, including the rescue and peacekeeping operations, mediation, political envoys, etc. The special focus is done on proactive peacekeeping policy of China and its new role in the security environment. Obviously, in future China will follow implementing the overseas missions, including humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, evacuation operations, defense of sea lanes, stabilization operations, peacekeeping and counterterrorism missions. After launching in 2017 its first overseas military base in Djibouti, there is little evidence to predict that in the near future China intends to construct more bases. But nevertheless the geopolitical rivalry with the United States might push China to convert three deep-water ports - Gwadar (Pakistan), Salalah (Oman), and Seychelles ports into naval bases. The degree of the China’s involvement in global security landscape will depend on the level of its responsibility, since Beijing is undergoing through a higher degree of international pressure in order to take more obligations. Responding to overseas security crises through military actions would be mostly shaped by events (case-by-case approach), inspired by political motivations and organized as small-scale and low-intensity missions.

About the authors

Alexandra Victorovna Khudaykulova

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO-University); RUDN University

Author for correspondence.

PhD (Political Sciences), Associate Professor of Department of Applied International Analysis, Moscow State Institute of International Relations of MFA of Russia (MGIMO University); Associate Professor of Department of Theory and History of International Relations, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Moscow, Russian Federation


  1. Alden, Ch., Alao, A., Chun, Zh. & Barber, L. (Eds.). (2018). China and Africa. Building Peace and Security Cooperation on the Continent. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-52893-9
  2. Bokeriya, S.A. & Omo-Ogbebor, D.O. (2016). Boko Haram: a New Paradigm to West Africa Security Challenges. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 16 (2), 274-284
  3. Campbell, I., Wheeler., Th., Attree, L., Butler, D.M. & Mariani, B. (2012). China and Conflict-Affected States. Between Principle and Pragmatism. London: Safeworld
  4. Cheng Guo, Chen Lu, Degterev, D.A. & Zhao Jelin. (2019). Geopolitical Implications of China’s “One Belt One Road” Strategy. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 19 (1), 77-88. doi: 10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-77-88
  5. Coning, C. & Peter, M. (Eds.) (2019). United Nations Peace Operations in a Changing Global Order. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99106-1
  6. Duchâtel, M., Bräuner, O. & Hang, Z. (2014). Protecting China’s Overseas Interests: The Slow Shift Away from Non-interference. SIPRI Policy Paper 41. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. URL: (accessed: 28.10.2019)
  7. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6 (03), 167-191. doi: 10.1177/002234336900600301
  8. Grachikov, E.V. (2019). Chinese School of International Relations. How Theory Creates Diplomatic Strategy and Vice Versa. Russia in Global Affairs, 17 (2), 154-173. doi: 10.31278/1810-6374-2019-17-2-154-173
  9. He, Y. (2007). China’s Changing Policy on UN Peacekeeping Operations. Asia Paper, Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm
  10. Hodzi, O. (2019). The End of China’s Non-Intervention Policy in Africa. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-97349-4
  11. Ikenberry, J. (2008). The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive. Foreign Affairs, 87 (1), 23-37
  12. Lei, Zh. (2011). Two Pillars of China’s Global Peace Engagement Strategy: UN Peacekeeping and International Peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping, 18 (03), 344-362. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2011.563107
  13. Lin-Greenberg, E. (2010). Dragon Boats: Assessing China’s Anti-Piracy Operations in the Gulf of Aden. Defense and Security Analysis, 26 (02), 213-230
  14. Lynch, C. (2014). UN Peacekeepers to Protect China’s Oil Interests in South Sudan. Foreign Policy, June 16. URL: (accessed: 28.10.2019)
  15. Ratner, E., Colby, E., Erickson, A., Hosford, Z. & Sullivan, A. (2015). More Willing and Able: Charting China’s International Security Activism. Center for a New American Security. URL: (accessed: 28.10.2019)
  16. Rolland, N. (Eds.) (2019). Securing the Belt and Road Initiative China’s Evolving Military Engagement Along the Silk Roads. The National Bureau of Asian Research. September 2019. NBR special report No. 80. URL: (accessed: 28.10.2019)
  17. Seesaghur, H.N. & Robertson, E. (2016). An Overview of the Chinese Agenda: Global Sustainable Peace and Development. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Relationes Internationales, 9 (02), 154-171
  18. Suzuki, Sh. (2011). Why Does China Participate in Intrusive Peacekeeping? Understanding Paternalistic Chinese Discourses on Development and Intervention. International Peacekeeping, 18 (03), 271-285. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2011.563079
  19. Wuthnow, J. (2017). Chinese Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative: Strategic Rationales, Risks, and Implications. Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University. China Strategic Perspectives, No. 12. URL: ChinaPerspectives-12.pdf (accessed: 28.10.2019)
  20. Xue G. (2019). The Potential Dual Use of Support Facilities in the Belt and Road Initiative. In: Rolland, N. (Eds.). Securing the Belt and Road Initiative China’s Evolving Military Engagement Along the Silk Roads. The National Bureau of Asian Research. September 2019. NBR special report No. 80 P. 47-59. URL: publications/sr80_securing_the_belt_and_road_sep2019.pdf (accessed: 28.10.2019)
  21. Zhang, Ch. & Zhang, M. (2018). China-Africa Cooperation in the Peace and Security Issues. National Think Tank. ChinaAfrica Friendly Cooperation in the New Era Think Tank Reports. No. 4. China Social Sciences Press
  22. Jianxin, L., Shou, W. & Hui, Zh. (2015). Guoji weihe xue [A Study on International Peacekeeping]. Beijing: Guofang daxue chuban she [Beijing: National Defense University Press]. (In Chinese)
  23. Yaqing, Q. (Eds.). (2019). Quanqiu zhili: Duoyuan shijie de zhixu chongjian [Global Governance: Rebuilding of Order in Multiplex World]. Beijing: Shijie zhishi chuban she [Beijing: World Knowledge Press]. (In Chinese)

Copyright (c) 2019 Khudaykulova A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies