The efficiency assessment of short-term maximum flood level forecast methodology in the upper and middle course of the Tsna river

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

A significant rise in water levels in the rivers during the spring flood and the release of rivers to the floodplain is the main danger in this period for nearby territories and people living there. This phenomenon can lead to flooding of large areas, significant economic losses, environmental damage, and threaten the health and life of local residents. Such negative consequences of high floods are typical for the Tambov region rivers, which indicates the need to develop an effective system for forecasting and preventing maximum flood levels. The climatic changes that have taken place over the past few decades, which are also reflected in the rivers’ water regime, show the need to modernize existing forecasting methodologies. In this paper, the authors have demonstrated the results of the effectiveness assessment of the existing methodology for short-term forecasting of the maximum flood level on the Tsna River at two gauging stations (“Kuzmino-Gat” and “Tambov”). Calculations were made using modern data in accordance with this methodology and a comparative analysis was carried out with the calculations of previous years. Based on this analysis, an assessment of the flood levels forecast methodology accuracy was given. According to the study results, it was found that the existing methodology for short-term forecasting of the maximum flood level on the Tsna River is largely ineffective nowadays with regard to modern conditions of spring flood runoff formation. In the analysis of the Kuzmino-Gat gauging station, the values of the maximum flood levels obtained by the reanalysis method according to the tested methodology using modern data showed significant deviations from the actual observed values. At the same time, for the operational forecast of maximum water levels at the Tambov gauging station, it is possible to use the correlation dependence with the observed water levels at the Kuzmino-Gat gauging station, as before. The correlation coefficient with modern data was 0.96. The authors have highlighted the main drawbacks of the existing methodology and made suggestions for improvement, in particular, what factors need to be analyzed in order to clarify the forecast.

About the authors

Sergey N. Dudnik

Central Chernozem Department for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring

Email: tgmc@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2661-0854

Head of Tambov Center for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring

182 Sovetskaya St, Tambov, 392008, Russian Federation

Mikhail E. Bukovskiy

Derzhavin Tambov State University

Email: mikezzz@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2773-3816
SPIN-code: 7774-1375

PhD in Geography, Assistant Professor, Head of Laboratory for Monitoring the Agroclimatic and Water-Resource Potentials of the Territories, Research Institute of Ecology and Biotechnology

33 Internatsional’naya St, Tambov, 392036, Russian Federation

Anna V. Semenova

Derzhavin Tambov State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: asv273@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9306-9861
SPIN-code: 5544-5277

2nd year postgraduate student of scientific specialty 1.6.21. Geoecology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Management, Junior Researcher of Laboratory for Monitoring the Agroclimatic and Water-Resource Potentials of the Territories, Research Institute of Ecology and Biotechnology

33 Internatsional’naya St, Tambov, 392036, Russian Federation

References

  1. Davies JB. Economic analysis of the costs of flooding. Canadian Water Resources Journal Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques. 2015 Jul 9;41(1–2):204–19. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2015.1055804
  2. Dmitrieva VA. Of Spring Flood in Don River Basin and Their Water Management and Hydroecological Consequences. Belgorod State University Scientific bulletin Natural Sciences. 2018 Jun 30;37(2):181–90. Available from: http://doi.org/10.18413/2075-4671-2018-42-2-181-190 (In Russ.).
  3. Bukovskiy ME, Semenova AV. Analysis of the effects of climatic factors on flood peak formation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019 Nov 1;386(1):012034. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/386/1/012034
  4. Apollov BA, Kalinin, GP, Komarov VD. Course of hydrological forecasts: Textbook for hydrometeorological institutes and geographical departments of universities. Moscow: Gidrometeoizdat Publ.; 1974. 422 p. (In Russ.).
  5. Voeikov AI. On the question of the flood of 1908 and the prediction of the level of rivers. Meteorological Bulletin. 1908;7:17 p. (In Russ.).
  6. Lebedev VN. Methods for predicting the height of the spring flood of rivers. News of the Russian Hydrological Institute. 1924. 11 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Anfilatov VS, Emelyanov AA, Kukushkin AA. System analysis in management: textbook. Moscow: Finance and statistics Publ.; 2002. 368 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Anashechkin AD, Trophimets EN. The question of building a short-term predictive models of water levels on stretches of the rivers. Scientific and analytical journal “Bulletin of St. Petersburg University of the State Fire Service of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia”. 2019;1:36–43. (In Russ.).
  9. Motovilov YG, Gelfan AN. Models of runoff formation in problems of hydrology of river basins. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences Publ.; 2018. 300 p. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31857/S9785907036222000001 (In Russ.).
  10. Mosavi A, Ozturk P, Chau K. Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Literature Review. Water. 2018 Oct 27;10(11):1536. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w10111536
  11. Jain SK, Mani P, Jain SK, Prakash P, Singh VP, Tullos D, et al. A Brief review of flood forecasting techniques and their applications. International Journal of River Basin Management. 2018 Jan 22;16(3):329–44. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2017.1411920
  12. Wu W, Emerton R, Duan Q, Wood AW, Wetterhall F, Robertson DE. Ensemble flood forecasting: Current status and future opportunities. WIREs Water. 2020 Mar 29;7(3). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1432
  13. Pyankov SV, Shikhov AN. Geoinformation support for modeling hydrological processes and phenomena. Perm: Perm State National Research University Publ.; 2017. 148 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Gelfan A, Frolova N, Magritsky D, Kireeva M, Grigoriev V, Motovilov Yu, Gusev E. Climate change impact on annual and maximum runoff of Russian rivers: diagnosis and projections. Fundamental and Applied Climatology. 2021;7(1):36–79. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21513/2410-8758-2021-1-36-79 (In Russ.).
  15. Frolova NL, Kireeva MB, Kharlamov MA, Samsonov TE, Entin AL, Lurie IK. Mapping the current state and transformation of the water regime of rivers in the European territory of Russia. Geodesy and Cartography. 2020 Aug 20;961(7):14–26. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.22389/0016-7126-2020-961-7-14-26 (In Russ.).
  16. Chernova MA, Bukovskiy ME, Dudnik VV. Assessment of changes in the summer flow of rivers in the volga basin in the tambov region over 65 years. Climate Change and Seasonal Landscape Dynamics. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. 2021. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.26170/kfg-2021-16 (In Russ.).
  17. Dudnik NI. Catalog “Rivers of the Tambov region”. Tambov: Tambov State Pedagogical Institute Publ.; 1991. 47 p. (In Russ.).

Copyright (c) 2024 Dudnik S.N., Bukovskiy M.E., Semenova A.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies