Restorative dynamics of pine phytocenoses in clearcut areas in the floodplain terraces of the Moscow River

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

Initial stages of restoration dynamics of phytocoenoses are of a special interest. Ecological conditions change crucially after timber harvesting. The exploration of two clearcut areas in the Moscow River valley in 3-5 years after felling allowed us to detect the direction of phytocoenosis dynamics. Scotch pine ( Pinus sylvestris L.) losses the competition with deciduous species in both sites constituting less than 50 % of regeneration. The largest number of individuals of Pinus sylvestris L. at the research sites, they have a three-year age: clear cut area No. 1 - 55 % and clear cut area No. 2 - 47 %. An intensive height increment of prevailing tree species was registered. In the site No. 1, an annual increase in height increment was registered indicating favourable growth conditions, while in the site No. 2, the 4-centimeter reduction of height increment was observed in the last year. The soil vegetation cover is an important ecological factor regulating the restoration dynamics of phytocoenoses on clearcut areas. To estimate the restoration dynamics of soil cover vegetation, 45 geobotanical descriptions were made. Totally 102 species of vascular plants referred to 72 genera were found on clearcut areas. The families with the highest frequency were Asteraceae - 12,7 %, Apiaceae - 10,8 %, and Poaceae - 8,8 %. A noticeable presence of Poaceae in the vegetation cover limits successful reforestation. The percentage of the most widespread ecologo-coenotic groups is 45% of the total number of registered species for meadow herbs, 16 % for tall herbs, 11 % for nemoral species, and 9% for forbs. Summary average projective coverage of herbage is 65-75 %. Under the conditions of reed-grass - herbal type of clearcut areas, Scotch pine is suppressed by both deciduous species and herbal vegetation, which makes the perspectives of its predomination in the future stand doubtful.

About the authors

Daniil V. Lezhnev

Institute of Forest Science, RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: lezhnev.daniil@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2706-7320
SPIN-code: 5133-7760

Junior Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Forestry and Biological Productivity

21 Sovetskaya, Uspenskoe, Moscow region, 143030, Russian Federation

Daria D. Kulikova

Bauman Moscow State Technical University

Email: kulikovadd@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-2014-2801

MSC student of the Department of Forestry, Ecology, Forest Protection

1 1st Institutskaya St, Mytischi, 141005, Russian Federation

Galina A. Polyakova

Institute of Forest Science, RAS

Email: park-galina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5807-2408
SPIN-code: 2283-8574

Doctor of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Forest Geobotany and Forest Soil Science

21 Sovetskaya, Uspenskoe, Moscow region, 143030, Russian Federation

References

  1. Abaturov AV, Kochevaya OV, Yangutov AI. 150 let Losinoostrovskoy lesnoy dache. Iz istorii natsional'nogo parka «Losinyy ostrov». Aslan. 1997:228. (In Russ.)
  2. Korotkov SA, Glazunov YuB, Polyakova GA, Kulikova DD. Renewal of pine trees in cuttings in the Serebryanoborsky experimental forestry of the Institute of Forestry of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Spatial and temporal aspects of the functioning of biosystems: a collection of materials of the XVI International Scientific Ecological Conference dedicated to the memory of Alexander Vladimirovich Prisny. Еd. YuA. Prisny. Belgorod: Belgorod State National Research University; 2020. p. 200–204.
  3. Šipek M, Ravnjak T, Šajna N. Understorey species distinguish late successional and ancient forests after decades of minimum human intervention: A case study from Slovenia Forest Ecosystems. 2023:100096.
  4. Gasanov G. et al. Data on the productivity of plant cover of the main types of soils of the North-Western precaspian in connection with the dynamics of ecological factors. 2019;24:103713.
  5. Nakhoul J. et al. Vegetation dynamics and regeneration of Pinus pinea forests in Mount Lebanon: Towards the progressive disappearance of pine. Ecological Engineering. 2020;152:105866.
  6. Niu H, Rehling F, Chen Z, Yue X, Zhao H, Wang X, Zhang H, Schabo DG, Farwig N. Regeneration of urban forests as influenced by fragmentation, seed dispersal mode and the legacy effect of reforestation interventions Landscape and Urban Planning. 2023; 233:104712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104712
  7. Lezhnev DV. Renewal under the canopy of pine forests and clearings in the Moscow suburbs. Increasing the efficiency of the forest complex. Materials of the eighth All-Russian national scientific-practical conference with international participation. Petrozavodsk. 2022:95–97. (In Russ.)
  8. Ammer C. et al. Key ecological research questions for Central European forests. Basic and Applied Ecology. 2018;32:3–25.
  9. Varaksin GS. et al. Availability of forest plots for reforestation activities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;839(5):052018.
  10. Lezhnev DV, Menyaeva VA. Soil vegetation cover of pine phytocenoses of the Yauzsky forest park “Losiny Ostrov”. XXII Scientific and Practical Forum “Problems of Greening Large Cities”: collection of articles. 2023:113–118. (In Russ.)
  11. Bílek L, Vacek Z, Vacek S, Bulušek D, Linda R, Král J. (2018). Are clearcut borders an effective tool for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) natural regeneration? Forest Systems. Vol. 27. Issue 2. e010. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2018272-12408R
  12. Vlasenko MV, Trubakova KY. Characteristics of the Seasonal Dynamic Structure of Phytocenoses on Sandy Grounds in the South of European Russia. Arid Ecosystems. 2022;28(1):115–124. (In Russ.)
  13. Sannikov SN. Types of cuttings, dynamics of the living ground cover and its role in the subsequent renewal of pine in the Pripyshminsky green moss forests. In: Forests of the Urals and the economy in them. Issue. 1. Svedlovsk; 1968. р. 280–301. (In Russ.)
  14. Belyaeva NV, Noikina AM. The success of the natural regeneration of pine in clearings, depending on the type of forest. Actual problems of the forest complex. 2008:6–21. (In Russ.)
  15. Ulanova NG. Main trends in biodiversity dynamics after natural and anthropogenic “disasters” in the spruce forests of the European part of Russia. Samarskaya Luka: problems of regional and global ecology. 2018;27(4–1):84–92. (In Russ.)
  16. Storozhenko VG. Natural renewal in indigenous spruce forests of different ages in the European taiga of Russia. Siberian Forest Journal. 2017;3:87–92. (In Russ.)
  17. Tyrchenkova IV. Estimation of natural reforestation in artificial pine plantations of the Voronezh region. Forest engineering journal. 2018;8(2):104–114. (In Russ.)
  18. Pobedinsky AV. Felling and regeneration in the taiga forests of the USSR. Forest industry. 1973;200. (In Russ.)
  19. Przybylski P, Konatowska M, Jastrzębowski S, Tereba A, Mohytych V, Tyburski Ł, et al. The possibility of regenerating a pine stand through natural regeneration forests. 2021;12(8):1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081055
  20. Ara M, Barbeito I, Kalén C, Nilsson U. Regeneration failure of Scots pine changes the species composition of young forests. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2022;37(1):14–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2021.2005133
  21. Maslakov EL, Kolesnikov BP. Classification of clearings and natural renewal of pine forests in the middle taiga subzone of the plain Trans-Urals. Forests of the Urals, and the economy in them.1968;(1):246–279. (In Russ.)
  22. Abaturov AV, Melancholin PN. Natural dynamics of the forest on permanent trial plots in the Moscow region: monograph. Tula: Grif and K; 2004. 336 p. (In Russ.)
  23. Rysin LP. Forests near Moscow. Russian acad. Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Forest Science. Moscow: Association of Scientific. ed. KMK; 2012. 255 p. (In Russ.)
  24. Zaripov YV, Zalesov SV, Zalesova ES, Popov AS, Platonov EP, Starodubtseva NI. News of higher educational institutions. Forest magazine. 2021;(5):22–33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2021-5-22-33
  25. Stonozhenko LV, Korotkov SA, Grishenkov VA. Renewal under the forest canopy in the national park “Ugra” [Electronic resource]. Forestry. inform.: electron. network magazine. 2018;(2):35–45. (In Russ.) URL: http://lhi.vniilm.ru/ (accessed: 14.05.2023).
  26. Lezhnev DV. Research methods of natural renewal of forest ecosystems. Digital technologies in the forest industry. materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference. Voronezh. 2022:130–138. (In Russ.)
  27. Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensoziologie, Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3rd Edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin; 1964. 631 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8110-2
  28. Nitsenko AA. On the study of the ecological structure of vegetation Bot. magazine.1969;54(7):1002–1014. (In Russ.)
  29. Zozulin GM. Historical suites of vegetation of the European part of the USSR. Botanical Journal – Botanical Journal. 1973;58(8):1081–1092. (In Russ.)
  30. Smirnova OV, Khanina LG, Smirnov VE. Ecological and coenotic groups in the vegetation cover of the forest belt of Eastern Europe. In: Eastern European forests: history in the Holocene and modernity. O.V. Smirnova (ed.) Book. 1. Moscow; 2004. р. 165–175. (In Russ.)
  31. Babich NA, Evdokimov IV, Nevolin NN. Pine cultures of the Vologda region. Vologda; 2008. 136 p. (In Russ.)
  32. Danilov DA, Mandrykin SS, Shestakov VI, Shestakova TA. Renewal of spruce and pine on post-agrogenic lands in the Leningrad region. Actual problems of the forest complex. 2018;(51):28–31. (In Russ.)
  33. Gribacheva OV, Chernodubov AI, Sotnikov DV. Dynamics of the rank distribution of trees by height in the shelterbelt with the participation of English oak (Quercus robur l.) and Norway maple (Acer platanoides l.). Forest technical journal. 2020;10(1):15–25. (In Russ.)
  34. Smirnov VE, Khanina LG, Bobrovsky MV. Substantiation of the system of ecological-coenotic groups of plant species in the forest zone of European Russia based on ecological scales, geobotanical descriptions and statistical analysis. Bulletin of the Moscow Society of Naturalists. Department of biology. 2006;111(2):36–47. (In Russ.)
  35. Nalivaichenko AA, Skripnikov PN, Gorbov SN, Matetskaya AY. The study of biodiversity of some forest-park phytocenoses of the Rostov agglomeration. Lesotekhnicheskii zhurnal [Forestry Engineering journal]. 2022;12;4(48):169–184. https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2022.4/12 (In Russ.)
  36. Titlyanova AA, Sambuu AD. Successions in grass ecosystems. Novosibirsk: Publishing House of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2016:191 (In Russ.)
  37. Mirkin BM, Rozenberg GS. Phytocenology. Principles and methods. Moscow: Nauka; 1978. 212 р. (In Russ.)
  38. Melekhov IS. Lesovedenie: ucheb. Moscow: Forest industry; 1980. 406 p. (In Russ.)

Copyright (c) 2023 Lezhnev D.V., Kulikova D.D., Polyakova G.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies