Satellite indicators of air quality changes over Russia due to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions

Cover Page

Cite item


The analysis of the dust content (pm10) and NO2 in the atmosphere over Russia for January - May 2020 in comparison with previous years was carried out. Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service data archives are used as a source of information. It was found that the imposition of socio-economic restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic affected the content of dust and nitrogen oxide in the atmosphere unevenly for different regions of the country. The state of atmospheric dust and NO2 content has improved due to the restrictions imposed in a number of regions of the Far East (apparently, also due to restrictions on the territory of neighboring China) and, to a lesser degree, in the center of the European part of Russia. The information obtained can be used to predict the development of the social and economic situation in the coming years and to plan preventive measures to overcome the economic and social consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to develop proposals to overcome negative consequences for the environment, including measures to optimize territorial development, nature protection and consideration of ecosystem functions.

About the authors

Igor Yu. Savin

V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Author for correspondence.
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8739-5441

Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor of the Institute of Environmental Engineering, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University); chief researcher, V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Institute

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russia;7 Pyzhevskii Pereulok, bldg 2, Moscow, 119017, Russia

Andrej V. Chinilin

V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute; Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy

ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4237-7995

Associate Professor of the Faculty of Soil Science, Agrochemistry and Ecology, K.A. Timiryazev Russian State Agricultural Academy; junior researcher, V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Institute

49 Timiryazevskaya St, Moscow, 127434, Russia; 7 Pyzhevskii Pereulok, bldg 2, Moscow, 119017, Russia

Sergey A. Avetyan

V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute; Lomonosov Moscow State University

ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3435-9092

senior researcher, V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Institute; researcher, Faculty of Soil Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University

7 Pyzhevskii Pereulok, bldg 2, Moscow, 119017, Russia;1 Leninskie Gory, bldg 12, Moscow, 119991, Russia

Ekaterina A. Shishkonakova

V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute

ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4396-2712

senior researcher

7 Pyzhevskii Pereulok, bldg 2, Moscow, 119017, Russia

Elena Yu. Prudnikova

V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7743-8607

senior researcher, V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Institute; Associate Professor of the Department of Environmental Management, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

7 Pyzhevskii Pereulok, bldg 2, Moscow, 119017, Russia; 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St, Moscow, 117198, Russia


  1. Baldasano JM. Covid-19 lockdown effects on air quality by NO2 in the cities of Barcelona and Madrid (Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 2020;741:140353.
  2. Chakraborty I, Maity P. COVID-19 outbreak: migration, effect on society, global environment and prevention. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;728:138882. Epub 2020 Apr 22
  3. Gama C, Revals H, Lopes M, Monteiro A. The impact of Covid-19 on air quality levels in Portugal: a way to assess traffic contribution. Environ. Res. 2021;193:110515. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
  4. Ibn-Mohammed T, Mustapha KB, Godsell J, Adamu Z, Babatunde KA, Akintade DD, Acquaye A, Fujii H, Ndiaye MM, Yamoah FA, Koh SCL. A critical review of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies. Resources, Conservation & Recycling. 2021;164(39):105169.
  5. Otmani A, Benchrif A, Tahri M, Bounakhla M, El Mahjoub C, El Bouch M, Krombi M. Impact of Covid-19 lockdown on PM10, SO2 and NO2 concentrations in Sale City (Morocco). Science of the Total Environment. 2020;735:139541.
  6. Muhammad S, Long X, Salman M. COVID-19 pandemic and environmental pollution: а blessing in disguise? Science of the Total Environmental. 2020;728:138820.
  7. Rume T, Didar-UI Islam SM. Environmental effects of COVID-19 pandemic and potential strategies of sustainability. Heliyon. 2020;6:e04965.
  8. Wu C-L, Wang H-W, Cai W-J, He H, Ni A, Peng Z. Impact of the Covid-19 lockdown on roadside traffic related air pollution in Shanghai, China. Building and Environment. 2021:107718.
  9. Copiello S, Grillenzoni C. The spread of 2019-nCoV in China was primarily driven by population density. Comment on “Association between short-term exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 infection: evidence from China” by Zhu et al. Science of Total Environment. 2020;744:141028.
  10. Liang D, Shi L, Zhao J, Liu P, Sarnat JA, Gao S, Schwartz J, Liu Y, Ebelt ST, Scovronick N, Chang HH. Urban air pollution may enhance COVID-19 case-fatality and mortality rates in the United States. The Innovation. 2020;1(3):100047.
  11. Perone G. The determinants of COVID-19 case fatality rate (CFR) in the Italian regions and provinces: an analysis of environmental, demographic, and healthcare factor. Sсience of the Total Environment. 2021;755(Pt 1):142523.
  12. Zhang Z, Xue T, Jin X. Effects of meteorological conditions and pollution on COVID-19 transmission: evidence from 219 Chinese cities. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;741:140244.
  13. Friedlingstein P, O’Sullivan M, Jones MW, Andrew RM., Hauck J, Olsen A, Peters GP, Peters W, Pongratz J, Sitch S, Le Quéré C, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Jackson RB, Alin S, Aragão LEOC, Arneth A, Arora V, Bates NR, Becker M, Benoit-Cattin A, Bittig HC, Bopp L, Bultan S, Chandra N, Chevallier F, Chini LP, Evans W, Florentie L, Forster PM, Gasser T, Gehlen M, Gilfillan D, Gkritzalis T, Gregor L, Gruber N, Harris I, Hartung K, Haverd V, Houghton RA, Ilyina T, Jain AK, Joetzjer E, Kadono K, Kato E, Kitidis V, Korsbakken JI, Landschützer P, Lefèvre N, Lenton A, Lienert S, Liu Z, Lombardozzi D, Marland G, Metzl N, Munro DR, Nabel JEMS, Nakaoka S-I, Niwa Y, O’Brien K, Ono T, Palmer PI, Pierrot D, Poulter B, Resplandy L, Robertson E, Rödenbeck C, Schwinger J, Séférian R, Skjelvan I, Smith AJP, Sutton AJ, Tanhua T, Tans PP, Tian H, Tilbrook B, van der Werf G, Vuichard N, Walker AP, Wanninkhof R, Watson AJ, Willis D, Wiltshire AJ, Yuan W, Yue X, Zaehle S. Global Carbon Budget 2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 2020;12(4):3269-3340.
  14. Urban RC, Nakada LYК. COVID-19 pandemic: solid waste and environmental impacts in Brazil. Science of the Total Environment. 2021;755:142471.
  15. Gwenzi W, Rzymski P. When silence goes viral, Africa sneezes! A perspective on Africa’s subdued research response to COVID-19 and a call for local scientific evidence. Environmental Research. 2021;194:110637.
  16. Gelaro R, McCarty W, Suárez MJ, Todling R, Molod A, Takacs L, Randles C, Darmenov A, Bosilovich MG, Reichle R, Wargan K, Coy L, Cullather R, Draper C, Akella S, Buchard V, Conaty A, da Silva A, Gu W, Kim GK, Zhao B. The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2). Journal of Climate. 2017;30(13):5419-5454.
  17. Xu W, Wu J, Cao L. COVID-19 pandemic in China: context, experience and lessons. Health Policy and Technology. 2020;9(4):639-648.

Copyright (c) 2021 Savin I.Y., Chinilin A.V., Avetyan S.A., Shishkonakova E.A., Prudnikova E.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies