Email this article 
Forms of protective behavior of synanthropic birds in response to the biorepellent effect
- Authors: Enaleev I.R1, Sergeev S.A2
-
Affiliations:
- Union of fans of falconry and conservation of birds of prey “Russian Falcon”
- Branch of a JSC “Waste Management” in Novocheboksarsk
- Issue: Vol 27, No 1 (2019)
- Pages: 59-64
- Section: Short announcements
- URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/ecology/article/view/22110
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2310-2019-27-1-59-64
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The purpose of this scientific and practical research is to increase efficiency of the use of biorepellent (birds of prey) while ensuring the ornithological safety of facilities for the municipal solid waste recycling and disposal. Various forms of gregarious protective behavior of synanthropic birds (Corvidae, Laridae) are considered. A new form of protective behavior has been revealed in the Corvidae family.
Keywords
About the authors
Ildar R Enaleev
Union of fans of falconry and conservation of birds of prey “Russian Falcon”
Author for correspondence.
Email: krechet.65@mail.ru
Doctor of Biological Sciences, member-correspondent of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, President of Union of fans of falconry and conservation of birds of prey “Russian Falcon”.
10 Adelya Kutuya St., Kazan, 420073, Russian FederationSergey A Sergeev
Branch of a JSC “Waste Management” in Novocheboksarsk
Email: Sergeev605@yandex.ru
environmental engineer, branch of JSC “Waste Management” in Novocheboksarsk, the applicant of a scientific degree of Candidate of Biological Sciences
16 Shorshel'skii proezd, Novocheboksarsk, 429950, Russian FederationReferences
- Zvonov BM. Ornithological safety. Moscow: Ontoprint; 2010.
- Enaleev IR, Rakhimov II. Special training of birds of prey for use as biorepellents. Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Ecology and Life Safety. 2011;(1): 28–32.
- Thompson J. Inside the Kremlin. Natl. Geogr. 1990;(5): 62–105.
- Hoglund N. Der Habicht Accipiter gentilis in Fennoscandia. Swedish Game Research. 1964;2: 195–270.
- Jacobi VE. On the adaptive value of flock behavior of birds. Proceedings of the 5th Baltic. Ornithol. Conf. Tallinn: Valgus Publ.; 1967. p. 144–152.
- Caro TM. Pursuit – deterrence revisited. Trends Ecology and Evolution. 1995;10: 500–503.
- Frankenberg E. The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. IV. “Alerting others” and “perception advertisement” in blackbirds facing an owl. Behaviour. 1981;10: 13–39.
- MacGowan JD. Distribution, density and productivity of goshawks in interior Alaska. Fed. Aid Wildl. Restor. Proj. Rep. 1975.
- Baskin LM. The laws of the herd. Moscow: Znaniye Publ.; 1971.
- Manteuffel BP. Ecological and evolutionary aspects of animal behavior. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1987.
- Marler P. Specific distinctiveness in the communication signals of birds. Behaviour. 1957;11: 13–39.
- Gladkevich SA. Age features of the initial stage of attacks of a Goshawk on pigeons. Proceedings of 10th All-Union Ornithological Conference. Part 2. Minsk; 1990. p. 148.
