Political Dimension of Heritage Preservation in Russia: Case of Moscow Movement Arkhnadzor

Abstract


During the last decade cultural issues are being discussed in the Russian public sphere and have become the inherent part of the political agenda both at federal and regional levels. Heritage preservation is an element of cultural policy at large. This article answers two questions. Is there political dimension of heritage preservation? What could be the precondition of politization/depolitization in the field of heritage preservation? In order to answer both questions the author analyzes norms of international law in the field of heritage preservation and also he traced the evolution of the terms heritage and heritage site. Additionally, author analyzes activities of Moscow heritage movement Arkhnadzor as an attempt to find out the political dimension of it. In this paper the issues of heritage conservation were analyzed through the lens of political science and advocacy theory which makes this research new and specific.


A A Zverev

azverev@hse.ru
<p>National Research University &ldquo;Higher School of Economics&rdquo;</p>

20, Myasnitskaya str., Moscow, Russian Federation, 101000

  • Analiticheskij otchet LiveInternet po sajtu dvizhenija «Arhnadzor». Available from: http://www.liveinternet.ru/stat/archnadzor.ru/summary.html (In Russ).
  • Vseobshhaja deklaracija JuNESKO o kul'turnom raznoobrazii. 2001 (In Russ).
  • Gladarev B. Istoriko-kul'turnoe nasledie Peterburga: rozhdenie obshhestvennosti iz duha goroda. Ot obshhestvennogo k publichnomu. Ed. O. Harhordina. SPb.; izd-vo EUSP; 2011 (In Russ).
  • Doronovskaja M., Vajntrab L. Ob’ekt ohrany: Moskva. K 95-letiju obrazovanija sistemy organov ohrany pamjatnikov. Dokumenty i svidetel'stva. Departament kul'turnogo nasledija goroda Moskvy; 2012 (In Russ).
  • Kashirskih O.N. Politicheskie partii Germanii v kontekste modernizacii politicheskoj kommunikacii. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija. 2009; 2 (In Russ).
  • Konvencija ob ohrane vsemirnogo kul'turnogo i prirodnogo nasledija. 1972 (In Russ).
  • Oficial'nyj sajt obshhestvennogo dvizhenija «Arhnadzor». Available from: http://www.archnadzor.ru/aktsii-arhnadzora (In Russ).
  • Publichnyj otchet departamenta kul'turnogo nasledija za 2012 god. Moscow; DKN; 2013 (In Russ).
  • Sajt Vserossijskogo obshhestva ohrany pamjatnikov istorii i kul'tury. O VOOPIiK. Available from: http://www.voopik.ru/voopiik/ (In Russ).
  • Serto M. de. Izobretenie povsednevnosti. 1. Iskusstvo delat'. SPb.; Izd-vo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge; 2013 (In Russ).
  • Harvi D. Pravo na gorod. Logos. 2008; 3 (In Russ).
  • Shkaratan O.I. Social'no-jekonomicheskoe neravenstvo i ego vosproizvodstvo v sovremennoj Rossii. Moscow, ZAO «OLMA Media Grup»; 2009 (In Russ).
  • Castells M. The City and the Grassroots: a Cross-cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. London; Edward Arnold; 1983.
  • Franzen M. New social movements and gentrification in Hamburg and Stockholm: a comparative study. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 2005; Vol. 20; 1.
  • Harvey D. Social Justice and the City. Oxford UK; Blackwell Publishers; 1993.
  • Jenkins J.C. Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements. Annual Review of Sociology. 1983; Vol. 9.
  • Kulmala M., Tarasenko A. Interest Representation and Social Policy Making: Russian Veterans’ Organizations as Brokers between the State and Society. Europe-Asia Studies. 2016; 68:1.
  • Mosley J. Institutionalization, privatization, and political opportunity: what tactical choices reveal about the policy advocacy of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 2011; 40(3).
  • Mosley J. Nonprofit Organizations' Involvement in Participatory Processes: The Need for Democratic Accountability. Nonprofit Policy Forum. 2015; 7(1).
  • Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review. 1991; 16(1).
  • Su X. Heritage Production and Urban Locational Policy in Lijiang, China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2011; Vol. 35; 6 November.
  • World Heritage Watch. Final resolution International Conference “The UNESCO World Heritage and the Role of Civil Society”. Bonn, Germany; 26—27 June 2015.

Views

Abstract - 31

PDF (Russian) - 12


Copyright (c) 2017 Zverev A.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.